Is multilevel MIS-TLIF with bilateral facetectomy a lordosing procedure? A retrospective cohort of 3-level MIS-TLIF.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery. Spine Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.3171/2024.7.SPINE2468
Yen-Cheng Chang, Ching-Lan Wu, Hsuan-Kan Chang, Jiing-Feng Lirng, Wen-Cheng Huang, Jau-Ching Wu
{"title":"Is multilevel MIS-TLIF with bilateral facetectomy a lordosing procedure? A retrospective cohort of 3-level MIS-TLIF.","authors":"Yen-Cheng Chang, Ching-Lan Wu, Hsuan-Kan Chang, Jiing-Feng Lirng, Wen-Cheng Huang, Jau-Ching Wu","doi":"10.3171/2024.7.SPINE2468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a common surgery that has been extensively reported. However, publications on 3-level MIS-TLIF are sparse, and the effects of multilevel MIS-TLIF on sagittal balance remain controversial. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes and variables involved in the correction of sagittal imbalance by multilevel MIS-TLIF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients who underwent 3-level MIS-TLIF were retrospectively analyzed. Demographics and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Standard radiological and spinopelvic parameters were measured pre- and postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. A linear regression model was used to examine the correlation between preoperative segmental lordosis (SL) and the degree of sagittal correction. An optimal cutoff of preoperative SL to predict the change in sagittal correction was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients (mean follow-up 24.63 ± 12.69 months) were included. Postoperatively, all patients showed clinical improvements, demonstrated by the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale. The overall SL at the last follow-up was slightly nonsignificantly increased (1.23°, p = 0.267), while the other spinopelvic parameters, including lumbar lordosis (p = 0.008), sacral slope (p < 0.001), pelvic tilt (p = 0.002), and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (p = 0.006), all improved significantly compared with preoperatively. The preoperative SL was negatively correlated with the change in SL at the last follow-up (r2 = 0.2591, p = 0.0003), and the cutoff value was 26.89° (area under the ROC curve = 0.7836, p = 0.0087). The 24 patients who had a less lordotic lumbar spine (i.e., preoperative SL ≤ 27°) demonstrated significant improvement in spinopelvic parameters, whereas the other 23 patients (SL > 27°) had a slight, insignificant decrease of spinopelvic parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multilevel MIS-TLIF improved sagittal balance and SL with satisfactory patient-reported clinical outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. Multilevel MIS-TLIF was more effective in increasing lordosis in patients whose lumbar spine had a smaller preoperative lordotic curve (SL ≤ 27°).</p>","PeriodicalId":16562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.7.SPINE2468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a common surgery that has been extensively reported. However, publications on 3-level MIS-TLIF are sparse, and the effects of multilevel MIS-TLIF on sagittal balance remain controversial. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes and variables involved in the correction of sagittal imbalance by multilevel MIS-TLIF.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent 3-level MIS-TLIF were retrospectively analyzed. Demographics and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Standard radiological and spinopelvic parameters were measured pre- and postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. A linear regression model was used to examine the correlation between preoperative segmental lordosis (SL) and the degree of sagittal correction. An optimal cutoff of preoperative SL to predict the change in sagittal correction was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: Forty-seven patients (mean follow-up 24.63 ± 12.69 months) were included. Postoperatively, all patients showed clinical improvements, demonstrated by the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale. The overall SL at the last follow-up was slightly nonsignificantly increased (1.23°, p = 0.267), while the other spinopelvic parameters, including lumbar lordosis (p = 0.008), sacral slope (p < 0.001), pelvic tilt (p = 0.002), and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (p = 0.006), all improved significantly compared with preoperatively. The preoperative SL was negatively correlated with the change in SL at the last follow-up (r2 = 0.2591, p = 0.0003), and the cutoff value was 26.89° (area under the ROC curve = 0.7836, p = 0.0087). The 24 patients who had a less lordotic lumbar spine (i.e., preoperative SL ≤ 27°) demonstrated significant improvement in spinopelvic parameters, whereas the other 23 patients (SL > 27°) had a slight, insignificant decrease of spinopelvic parameters.

Conclusions: Multilevel MIS-TLIF improved sagittal balance and SL with satisfactory patient-reported clinical outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. Multilevel MIS-TLIF was more effective in increasing lordosis in patients whose lumbar spine had a smaller preoperative lordotic curve (SL ≤ 27°).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多层次MIS-TLIF与双侧面神经切除术是一种Lordosing手术吗?3级MIS-TLIF的回顾性队列。
目的:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)是一种常见手术,已有大量报道。然而,有关三水平 MIS-TLIF 的文献很少,而多水平 MIS-TLIF 对矢状面平衡的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在分析多级MIS-TLIF矫正矢状面不平衡的结果和相关变量:方法:对连续接受3级MIS-TLIF的患者进行回顾性分析。方法:对接受三水平 MIS-TLIF 的连续患者进行回顾性分析,评估了人口统计学和临床结果。在术前、术后和最后一次随访时测量了标准放射学和脊柱骨盆参数。采用线性回归模型研究了术前节段前凸(SL)与矢状位矫正程度之间的相关性。通过接收器操作特征(ROC)分析确定了预测矢状面矫正变化的最佳术前SL临界值:结果:共纳入 47 例患者(平均随访时间为 24.63 ± 12.69 个月)。术后,所有患者的临床表现均有所改善,Oswestry 失能指数和视觉模拟量表均显示了这一点。与术前相比,最后一次随访时的总体SL略有增加(1.23°,p = 0.267),但其他脊柱骨盆参数,包括腰椎前凸(p = 0.008)、骶骨斜度(p < 0.001)、骨盆倾斜(p = 0.002)和骨盆入射角-腰椎前凸不匹配(p = 0.006)均有显著改善。术前腰椎前凸与最后一次随访时腰椎前凸的变化呈负相关(r2 = 0.2591,p = 0.0003),临界值为 26.89°(ROC 曲线下面积 = 0.7836,p = 0.0087)。24名腰椎前凸程度较轻的患者(即术前SL≤27°)的脊柱骨盆参数有明显改善,而其他23名患者(SL>27°)的脊柱骨盆参数则有轻微、不明显的下降:结论:多层次 MIS-TLIF 改善了矢状平衡和 SL,术后 2 年患者报告的临床结果令人满意。对于术前腰椎前凸曲线较小(SL ≤ 27°)的患者,多水平 MIS-TLIF 在增加前凸方面更为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
Journal of neurosurgery. Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Primarily publish original works in neurosurgery but also include studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of 398 cases of intradural spinal tumor resection with primary dural closure: surgical outcomes based on the suture material. Safe, simple, and valid position for obtaining flexion-extension radiographs to assess instability in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis: one specific instruction can make a difference. Improved clinical and radiographic outcomes with expandable cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity-matched cohort analysis. Risk factors for postoperative ileus after corrective spinal surgery: association with reduction in the retrocrural space area. Is multilevel MIS-TLIF with bilateral facetectomy a lordosing procedure? A retrospective cohort of 3-level MIS-TLIF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1