Clinical Evaluation of Violet Light Filtration and High-Resolution Lathing on a Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus IOL.

IF 2.6 3区医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1007/s40123-024-01056-0

Daniel H Chang, Andrew A Kao, Laura K Huggins, Jacqueline N Albert, Jacqueline N Whinery, Brittany M Camirand

{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of Violet Light Filtration and High-Resolution Lathing on a Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus IOL.","authors":"Daniel H Chang, Andrew A Kao, Laura K Huggins, Jacqueline N Albert, Jacqueline N Whinery, Brittany M Camirand","doi":"10.1007/s40123-024-01056-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study is a prospective, randomized, subject/evaluator-masked clinical trial in a single-center clinical setting. The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical performance of Tecnis Symfony Optiblue IOL (models ZXR00V and ZXW150) with violet light filter (VLF) and manufacturing improvements versus Tecnis Symfony IOL (models ZXR00 and ZXT150) with ultraviolet light filter (UVF) in patients undergoing cataract surgery.Methods: Patients with cataracts aged ≥ 22 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to bilateral implantation with ZXR00V/ZXW150 (VLF group) or ZXR00/ZXT150 (UVF group). Key endpoints at 6 months postoperative included patient reported nighttime dysphotopsia symptoms, 25% low contrast visual acuity with glare, and patient satisfaction.Results: Sixty patients were implanted with ZXR00V/ZXW150 (30) or ZXR00/ZXT150 (30). At 6 months, the VLF group did not show a statistically significant differences in mean monocular photopic uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA) (40 cm), or distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) (40 cm) compared to the UVF group. At 1 month, patients in the VLF group reported significantly less difficulty due to halo (p = 0.016) and starburst (p = 0.028) symptoms. By the 6 months, dysphotopsia complaints were no longer significantly different between the groups. Although the VLF group trended toward better low contrast visual acuity and patient satisfaction, statistical significance was not reached.Conclusions: Managing the patients' expectations is key to achieving success. At the 1-month visit the patients who reported dysphotopsia complaints in the VLF group had significantly less difficulty with starbursts and halos as compared to the UVF group. By the 6-month visit, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the difficulty with starbursts and halos.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT06567834.","PeriodicalId":19623,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3135-3147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-01056-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study is a prospective, randomized, subject/evaluator-masked clinical trial in a single-center clinical setting. The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical performance of Tecnis Symfony Optiblue IOL (models ZXR00V and ZXW150) with violet light filter (VLF) and manufacturing improvements versus Tecnis Symfony IOL (models ZXR00 and ZXT150) with ultraviolet light filter (UVF) in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Methods: Patients with cataracts aged ≥ 22 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to bilateral implantation with ZXR00V/ZXW150 (VLF group) or ZXR00/ZXT150 (UVF group). Key endpoints at 6 months postoperative included patient reported nighttime dysphotopsia symptoms, 25% low contrast visual acuity with glare, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Sixty patients were implanted with ZXR00V/ZXW150 (30) or ZXR00/ZXT150 (30). At 6 months, the VLF group did not show a statistically significant differences in mean monocular photopic uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA) (40 cm), or distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) (40 cm) compared to the UVF group. At 1 month, patients in the VLF group reported significantly less difficulty due to halo (p = 0.016) and starburst (p = 0.028) symptoms. By the 6 months, dysphotopsia complaints were no longer significantly different between the groups. Although the VLF group trended toward better low contrast visual acuity and patient satisfaction, statistical significance was not reached.

Conclusions: Managing the patients' expectations is key to achieving success. At the 1-month visit the patients who reported dysphotopsia complaints in the VLF group had significantly less difficulty with starbursts and halos as compared to the UVF group. By the 6-month visit, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the difficulty with starbursts and halos.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT06567834.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

衍射型延展焦深人工晶体的紫光过滤和高分辨率缝合临床评估

研究简介本研究是一项在单中心临床环境下进行的前瞻性、随机、受试者/评估者屏蔽临床试验。研究目的是在白内障手术患者中比较带紫光过滤器（VLF）和制造改进的 Tecnis Symfony Optiblue IOL（型号 ZXR00V 和 ZXW150）与带紫外线过滤器（UVF）的 Tecnis Symfony IOL（型号 ZXR00 和 ZXT150）的临床表现：年龄≥ 22 岁的白内障患者按 1:1 随机分配到双侧植入 ZXR00V/ZXW150 （VLF 组）或 ZXR00/ZXT150 （UVF 组）。术后 6 个月的关键终点包括患者报告的夜间视力障碍症状、25% 的低对比度眩光视力和患者满意度：60名患者植入了ZXR00V/ZXW150（30人）或ZXR00/ZXT150（30人）。6 个月时，与 UVF 组相比，VLF 组的平均单眼光视未校正远视力 (UCDVA)、最佳校正远视力 (BCDVA)、未校正近视力 (UCNVA) (40 厘米) 或远视力校正近视力 (DCNVA) (40 厘米) 均无显著统计学差异。1 个月时，VLF 组患者报告的光晕（p = 0.016）和星辉（p = 0.028）症状明显减少。6 个月后，两组患者的视力障碍症状不再有明显差异。虽然 VLF 组的低对比度视力和患者满意度呈上升趋势，但未达到统计学意义：管理好患者的期望值是取得成功的关键。在 1 个月的就诊中，VLF 组报告视力障碍的患者与 UVF 组相比，在星芒和光晕方面的困难明显减少。在 6 个月的检查中，两组患者在星芒和光晕方面没有明显差异：试验注册：ClinicalTrials.gov identifier，NCT06567834。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Ophthalmology and Therapy OPHTHALMOLOGY-

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

3.00%

发文量

157

审稿时长

6 weeks

期刊介绍： Aims and Scope Ophthalmology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed (single-blind), and rapid publication journal. The scope of the journal is broad and will consider all scientifically sound research from preclinical, clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the use of ophthalmological therapies, devices, and surgical techniques. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/series, trial protocols and short communications such as commentaries and editorials. Ophthalmology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. Rapid Publication The journal’s publication timelines aim for a rapid peer review of 2 weeks. If an article is accepted it will be published 3–4 weeks from acceptance. The rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model this allows for the rapid, efficient communication of the latest research and reviews, fostering the advancement of ophthalmic therapies. Open Access All articles published by Ophthalmology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning authors will always have an editorial contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE, GPP and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Ophthalmology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case by case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials, and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviewer recommendations are conflicted, the editorial board will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed). Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting during the submission process or at any other point during consideration in one of our journals. Once the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to ensure that the preprint record is updated with a publication reference, including the DOI and a URL link to the published version of the article on the journal website. Please follow the link for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Ophthalmology and Therapy''s content is published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact christopher.vautrinot@springer.com.