Predictive Value of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width-to-Platelet Ratio for Severity in Pyogenic Liver Abscess: A Retrospective Observational Study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Surgical infections Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1089/sur.2024.068
Yunxiao Lyu, Hao Wang, Zhuojun Zhong, Bin Wang
{"title":"Predictive Value of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width-to-Platelet Ratio for Severity in Pyogenic Liver Abscess: A Retrospective Observational Study.","authors":"Yunxiao Lyu, Hao Wang, Zhuojun Zhong, Bin Wang","doi":"10.1089/sur.2024.068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The ratio of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) to platelet ratio (RPR) may have prognostic value in several inflammation-related diseases. However, few studies have been conducted on the value of RPR for predicting the severity of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients receiving the diagnosis of PLA from February 2013 to December 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. We collected data related to baseline characteristics and laboratory results within the first 24 hours the  of admission. The receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the predictive ability of different indicators for severity in PLA. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 278 patients were enrolled. For the prediction of sepsis in PLA, RPR had the highest AUC (0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.89) with a sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.82. For the prediction of septic shock, RPR also had the highest AUC (0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.88) with a sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.79. The best cutoff value for RPR to predict sepsis was 0.08 and to predict septic shock was 0.11. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> An increase in RPR level serves as a useful indicator with a predictive capacity for severity in PLA.</p>","PeriodicalId":22109,"journal":{"name":"Surgical infections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ratio of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) to platelet ratio (RPR) may have prognostic value in several inflammation-related diseases. However, few studies have been conducted on the value of RPR for predicting the severity of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA). Methods: Patients receiving the diagnosis of PLA from February 2013 to December 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. We collected data related to baseline characteristics and laboratory results within the first 24 hours the  of admission. The receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the predictive ability of different indicators for severity in PLA. Results: A total of 278 patients were enrolled. For the prediction of sepsis in PLA, RPR had the highest AUC (0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.89) with a sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.82. For the prediction of septic shock, RPR also had the highest AUC (0.74; 95% CI, 0.60-0.88) with a sensitivity of 0.67 and specificity of 0.79. The best cutoff value for RPR to predict sepsis was 0.08 and to predict septic shock was 0.11. Conclusions: An increase in RPR level serves as a useful indicator with a predictive capacity for severity in PLA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红细胞分布宽度与血小板比值对化脓性肝脓肿严重程度的预测价值:一项回顾性观察研究
背景:红细胞分布宽度(RDW)与血小板比值(RPR)在多种炎症相关疾病中可能具有预后价值。然而,有关 RPR 对预测化脓性肝脓肿(PLA)严重程度的价值的研究却很少。研究方法这项回顾性研究选取了 2013 年 2 月至 2022 年 12 月期间确诊为化脓性肝脓肿的患者。我们收集了与基线特征和入院后 24 小时内实验室结果相关的数据。采用接收者操作特征曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)来评估不同指标对PLA严重程度的预测能力。结果:共有 278 名患者入选。在预测 PLA 败血症方面,RPR 的 AUC 最高(0.83;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.78-0.89),灵敏度为 0.78,特异度为 0.82。在预测脓毒性休克方面,RPR 的 AUC 也最高(0.74;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.60-0.88),灵敏度为 0.67,特异性为 0.79。RPR 预测脓毒症的最佳临界值为 0.08,预测脓毒性休克的最佳临界值为 0.11。结论:RPRRPR 水平的升高是一个有用的指标,可预测 PLA 的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical infections
Surgical infections INFECTIOUS DISEASES-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Infections provides comprehensive and authoritative information on the biology, prevention, and management of post-operative infections. Original articles cover the latest advancements, new therapeutic management strategies, and translational research that is being applied to improve clinical outcomes and successfully treat post-operative infections. Surgical Infections coverage includes: -Peritonitis and intra-abdominal infections- Surgical site infections- Pneumonia and other nosocomial infections- Cellular and humoral immunity- Biology of the host response- Organ dysfunction syndromes- Antibiotic use- Resistant and opportunistic pathogens- Epidemiology and prevention- The operating room environment- Diagnostic studies
期刊最新文献
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Predicts Severe Cognitive Disability in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Letter to the Editor: Physics-Biology-Chemistry Model: A New Clinical Proposal for Intra-Abdominal Infections. Comparing Outcomes and Infection Risk in Medical, Surgical, and Trauma Intensive Care Patients with Alcohol Use Disorder. Patient and Health Professional's Perspectives of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography. Letter to the Editor: Mesentery Lymphangioma with Infection in Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1