Psychological impact of peri-implant fractures: A cross-sectional study.

Q3 Medicine Tunisie Medicale Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5068
Brahim Demnati, Zakaria Chabihi, El Mehdi Boumediane, Siham Dkhissi, Fahd Idarrha, Yassine Fath Elkhir, Mohamed Amine Benhima, Imad Abkari, Mohamed Rafai, Samir Ibn Moussa, Mohamed Rahmi
{"title":"Psychological impact of peri-implant fractures: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Brahim Demnati, Zakaria Chabihi, El Mehdi Boumediane, Siham Dkhissi, Fahd Idarrha, Yassine Fath Elkhir, Mohamed Amine Benhima, Imad Abkari, Mohamed Rafai, Samir Ibn Moussa, Mohamed Rahmi","doi":"10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peri-implant fractures (PIFs) are uncommon yet critical complications following orthopedic surgery. These complications can significantly impact a patient's psychological well-being and overall quality of life.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the psychological effects of PIFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study that involved 136 patients who underwent surgery for PIFs between 2018 and 2022. We utilized various validated scales and questionnaires such as Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and Brief COPE Inventory (BCI) to assess their psychological state.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The results revealed that patients with PIFs experienced higher levels of anxiety, depression, stress, and post-traumatic stress compared to the general population. Additionally, they reported lower physical and mental health. Factors such as the number of surgeries, treatment delay, post-operative pain levels, and complications significantly influenced their psychological outcomes. Notably, acceptance, positive reframing, and seeking emotional support were the most common coping mechanisms employed by these patients. Conversely, denial, substance use, and self blame were the least employed strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that psychological interventions could significantly benefit patients with PIFs, potentially reducing their distress and improving their quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":38818,"journal":{"name":"Tunisie Medicale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunisie Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peri-implant fractures (PIFs) are uncommon yet critical complications following orthopedic surgery. These complications can significantly impact a patient's psychological well-being and overall quality of life.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the psychological effects of PIFs.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that involved 136 patients who underwent surgery for PIFs between 2018 and 2022. We utilized various validated scales and questionnaires such as Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and Brief COPE Inventory (BCI) to assess their psychological state.

Result: The results revealed that patients with PIFs experienced higher levels of anxiety, depression, stress, and post-traumatic stress compared to the general population. Additionally, they reported lower physical and mental health. Factors such as the number of surgeries, treatment delay, post-operative pain levels, and complications significantly influenced their psychological outcomes. Notably, acceptance, positive reframing, and seeking emotional support were the most common coping mechanisms employed by these patients. Conversely, denial, substance use, and self blame were the least employed strategies.

Conclusion: This study suggests that psychological interventions could significantly benefit patients with PIFs, potentially reducing their distress and improving their quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种植体周围骨折的心理影响:横断面研究
简介:种植体周围骨折(PIF)是骨科手术后不常见但却很严重的并发症。这些并发症会严重影响患者的心理健康和整体生活质量。目的:本研究旨在调查 PIFs 的心理影响:这是一项横断面研究,涉及 2018 年至 2022 年期间接受 PIFs 手术的 136 名患者。我们采用了多种有效的量表和问卷,如医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、知觉压力量表(PSS)、事件影响量表修订版(IES-R)、36项简表调查(SF-36)和简明COPE量表(BCI)来评估他们的心理状态:结果显示,与普通人群相比,PIF 患者的焦虑、抑郁、压力和创伤后应激水平更高。此外,他们的身心健康水平也较低。手术次数、治疗延迟、术后疼痛程度和并发症等因素对他们的心理结果有很大影响。值得注意的是,接受、积极重塑和寻求情感支持是这些患者最常用的应对机制。相反,否认、使用药物和自责则是最不常用的应对策略:本研究表明,心理干预可使 PIFs 患者显著受益,有可能减轻他们的痛苦并提高他们的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tunisie Medicale
Tunisie Medicale Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
GAIA therapeutic farm: Prospective study on multidisciplinary care efficacy. Iatrogenic risk in elderly patients. Impact of virtual reality on the perception of procedural pain in paediatric oncology. Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intravenous Leiomyomatosis of the Uterus: An Intriguing Case Revealed through Anatomopathological Examination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1