Experiences in robotic colorectal surgery: comprehensive insights from a multi-center analysis using the Senhance Robotic System.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02136-w
Narimantas E Samalavicius, Rita Karpiciute, Vaida Nausediene, Frank Willeke, Olaf Martin Hansen, Vivianda Menke
{"title":"Experiences in robotic colorectal surgery: comprehensive insights from a multi-center analysis using the Senhance Robotic System.","authors":"Narimantas E Samalavicius, Rita Karpiciute, Vaida Nausediene, Frank Willeke, Olaf Martin Hansen, Vivianda Menke","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02136-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic-assisted surgery has revolutionised minimally invasive approaches, particularly in colorectal surgery. While many single-center studies on colorectal surgeries exist in present literature, including experiences with Senhance® Robotic Systems, comprehensive multi-center studies are lacking. This study, conducted through the TransEnterix European Patient Registry (\"TRUST\"), aims to assess the safety and feasibility in this context. The present study explored procedural times, complications, robotic malfunction and limitations, adverse events and pain management outcomes for colorectal procedures, including sigmoid resection, right hemicolectomy and rectal surgery collected in two European centers. Data from 355 colorectal surgeries showed that the median duration of surgery was 147.2 min (IQR: 124.3-183.0), the docking time was reported with a median of 3.4 min (IQR: 2.0-5.4) and the console time was found at a mean of 84.4 min (SD: 33.6). Despite minimal blood loss, pain scores, and robotic malfunction, 2.9% of the cases (10 instances) required conversions to either an open or laparoscopic approach. Further, most robotic limitations were attributed to limited motion (18.9%, 67 cases) and collisions (11.5%, 41 cases). Adverse events (24 cases, 6.8%) were effectively managed, with 23 instances judged completely unrelated to the robotic system. This study underscores the positive outcomes and safety profile of Senhance® Robotic Systems in colorectal surgery, contributing valuable insights for future research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02136-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery has revolutionised minimally invasive approaches, particularly in colorectal surgery. While many single-center studies on colorectal surgeries exist in present literature, including experiences with Senhance® Robotic Systems, comprehensive multi-center studies are lacking. This study, conducted through the TransEnterix European Patient Registry ("TRUST"), aims to assess the safety and feasibility in this context. The present study explored procedural times, complications, robotic malfunction and limitations, adverse events and pain management outcomes for colorectal procedures, including sigmoid resection, right hemicolectomy and rectal surgery collected in two European centers. Data from 355 colorectal surgeries showed that the median duration of surgery was 147.2 min (IQR: 124.3-183.0), the docking time was reported with a median of 3.4 min (IQR: 2.0-5.4) and the console time was found at a mean of 84.4 min (SD: 33.6). Despite minimal blood loss, pain scores, and robotic malfunction, 2.9% of the cases (10 instances) required conversions to either an open or laparoscopic approach. Further, most robotic limitations were attributed to limited motion (18.9%, 67 cases) and collisions (11.5%, 41 cases). Adverse events (24 cases, 6.8%) were effectively managed, with 23 instances judged completely unrelated to the robotic system. This study underscores the positive outcomes and safety profile of Senhance® Robotic Systems in colorectal surgery, contributing valuable insights for future research and clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人结直肠手术的经验:使用 Senhance 机器人系统进行多中心分析的综合见解。
机器人辅助手术彻底改变了微创方法,尤其是结直肠手术。虽然现有文献中有许多关于结直肠手术的单中心研究,包括使用 Senhance® 机器人系统的经验,但缺乏全面的多中心研究。本研究通过 TransEnterix 欧洲患者注册中心("TRUST")进行,旨在评估这种情况下的安全性和可行性。本研究探讨了两个欧洲中心收集的结直肠手术(包括乙状结肠切除术、右半结肠切除术和直肠手术)的手术时间、并发症、机器人故障和局限性、不良事件和疼痛控制结果。来自 355 例结直肠手术的数据显示,手术时间的中位数为 147.2 分钟(IQR:124.3-183.0),对接时间的中位数为 3.4 分钟(IQR:2.0-5.4),控制台时间的平均值为 84.4 分钟(SD:33.6)。尽管失血量、疼痛评分和机器人故障极少,但仍有 2.9% 的病例(10 例)需要转用开腹或腹腔镜方法。此外,大多数机器人的局限性归因于运动受限(18.9%,67 例)和碰撞(11.5%,41 例)。不良事件(24 例,6.8%)得到了有效控制,其中 23 例被判定与机器人系统完全无关。这项研究强调了 Senhance® 机器人系统在结直肠手术中的积极成果和安全性,为未来的研究和临床实践提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Body mass index influence on short-term perioperative results in robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. KangDuo surgical robot versus da Vinci robotic system in urologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Risk factors for urinary retention after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder diversion: a multicenter study. Single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The crucial role of 5G, 6G, and fiber in robotic telesurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1