Primary Care Clinicians' Interest In, and Barriers To, Medication Abortion.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2024.240005R1
Laurel M P Neufeld, Kristen P Mark
{"title":"Primary Care Clinicians' Interest In, and Barriers To, Medication Abortion.","authors":"Laurel M P Neufeld, Kristen P Mark","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240005R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Providing medication abortion in the primary care setting is a promising way to increase access to abortion, a threatened service in many States. This study aimed to characterize primary care clinicians' interest in prescribing medication abortion, what barriers they face in adding this service, and what support they need.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from 162 practicing primary care clinicians in Minnesota using an online survey with closed- and open-ended response options. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, group comparison analyses, and content analysis for the open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants represented a diverse range of ages, years in practice, credentials, genders, and urban/rural practice settings, and held mixed knowledge and attitudes around medication abortion. All demographic groups surveyed expressed interest in prescribing medication abortion, with the strongest interest represented among younger respondents, women, and those practicing in urban settings. Clinicians who provide prenatal care or who already work with these medications in other contexts were more likely to want to add medication abortion to their practices. The most common barrier to providing medication abortion was a lack of knowledge about organizational policies and about the medications themselves. To empower clinicians to provide medication abortion, respondents voiced needing their health systems to build clear processes and wanting supportive networks of other clinicians for collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the interest of primary care clinicians in providing medication abortion, health systems have a valuable opportunity to increase access.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 4","pages":"680-689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240005R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Providing medication abortion in the primary care setting is a promising way to increase access to abortion, a threatened service in many States. This study aimed to characterize primary care clinicians' interest in prescribing medication abortion, what barriers they face in adding this service, and what support they need.

Methods: Data were collected from 162 practicing primary care clinicians in Minnesota using an online survey with closed- and open-ended response options. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, group comparison analyses, and content analysis for the open-ended questions.

Results: Participants represented a diverse range of ages, years in practice, credentials, genders, and urban/rural practice settings, and held mixed knowledge and attitudes around medication abortion. All demographic groups surveyed expressed interest in prescribing medication abortion, with the strongest interest represented among younger respondents, women, and those practicing in urban settings. Clinicians who provide prenatal care or who already work with these medications in other contexts were more likely to want to add medication abortion to their practices. The most common barrier to providing medication abortion was a lack of knowledge about organizational policies and about the medications themselves. To empower clinicians to provide medication abortion, respondents voiced needing their health systems to build clear processes and wanting supportive networks of other clinicians for collaboration.

Conclusions: Given the interest of primary care clinicians in providing medication abortion, health systems have a valuable opportunity to increase access.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健临床医生对药物流产的兴趣和障碍。
目的:在初级保健环境中提供药物流产是增加人工流产机会的一种很有前景的方法,在许多国家,人工流产是一项受到威胁的服务。本研究旨在了解初级保健临床医生对开具药物流产处方的兴趣、他们在增加这项服务时面临哪些障碍以及他们需要哪些支持:方法:通过在线调查收集了明尼苏达州 162 名执业初级保健临床医生的数据,调查采用封闭式和开放式回答选项。数据分析采用了描述性统计、分组比较分析和开放式问题内容分析等方法:结果:参与者的年龄、从业年限、资历、性别、城市/农村从业环境各不相同,对药物流产的认识和态度也不尽相同。所有接受调查的人群都对药物流产处方表示出兴趣,其中年轻受访者、女性和在城市环境中执业的受访者兴趣最为浓厚。提供产前护理或已在其他情况下使用过这些药物的临床医生更有可能希望在其临床实践中加入药物流产。提供药物流产最常见的障碍是对组织政策和药物本身缺乏了解。为了增强临床医生提供药物流产的能力,受访者表示需要他们的医疗系统建立明确的流程,并希望有其他临床医生组成的支持性网络进行合作:结论:鉴于初级保健临床医生对提供药物流产的兴趣,医疗系统拥有增加药物流产可及性的宝贵机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Answering the "100 Most Important Family Medicine Research Questions" from the 1985 Hames Consortium. CERA: A Vehicle for Facilitating Research in Family Medicine. Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research. Diversity in Family Medicine Research. Leveraging the All of Us Database for Primary Care Research with Large Datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1