From Strikers to Keepers: Somatotype of Football Players from Slovakia.

IF 2.9 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.3390/sports12100271
Branislav Kolena, Barbora Šviríková, Mária Vondráková
{"title":"From Strikers to Keepers: Somatotype of Football Players from Slovakia.","authors":"Branislav Kolena, Barbora Šviríková, Mária Vondráková","doi":"10.3390/sports12100271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This study aims to analyze and compare the somatotypes of professional football players from Slovakia with a non-athletic population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comparative analysis of professional soccer players by their positions, goalkeepers (n = 4; 8%), defenders (n = 16; 32%), strikers (n = 15; 30%), and midfielders (n = 15; 30%), in average age 16.88 ± 1.29 years, based on selected anthropometric parameters, somatotype components, and the resultant somatotype using the Heath-Carter method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average somatotype of the soccer players was categorized as an ectomorphic mesomorph (40%). Goalkeepers showed significantly greater body height (BH 187.98 ± 3.166 cm) and weight (BW 82.33 ± 4.922 kg) than midfielders (BH 179.25 ± 6.126 cm; <i>p</i> = 0.03; BW 68 ± 6.304 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.014) and strikers (BH 176.04 ± 4.998 cm; <i>p</i> = 0.026; BW 68.93 ± 6.591 kg; <i>p</i> = 0.026). Defenders had significantly greater BH (182.14 ± 4.853 cm; <i>p</i> = 0.026) than strikers. Goalkeepers also had a significantly higher BMI than midfielders (23.28 ± 0.698 vs. 21.14 ± 1.282 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> = 0.02) and greater epicondylar width of the humerus (EWH 7.36 ± 0.14 cm) compared to strikers (EWH 6.79 ± 0.308 cm; <i>p</i> = 0.014). The average somatotype values identified goalkeepers [2.0-4.1-3.1], defenders [1.6-3.9-3.2], and strikers [1.7-4.2-2.9] as ectomorphic mesomorphs, while midfielders were identified as mesomorph-ectomorphs [1.6-3.7-3.6].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results highlight the importance of somatotype in player position suitability and its impact on physical attributes in football.</p>","PeriodicalId":53303,"journal":{"name":"Sports","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sports12100271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: This study aims to analyze and compare the somatotypes of professional football players from Slovakia with a non-athletic population.

Methods: Comparative analysis of professional soccer players by their positions, goalkeepers (n = 4; 8%), defenders (n = 16; 32%), strikers (n = 15; 30%), and midfielders (n = 15; 30%), in average age 16.88 ± 1.29 years, based on selected anthropometric parameters, somatotype components, and the resultant somatotype using the Heath-Carter method.

Results: The average somatotype of the soccer players was categorized as an ectomorphic mesomorph (40%). Goalkeepers showed significantly greater body height (BH 187.98 ± 3.166 cm) and weight (BW 82.33 ± 4.922 kg) than midfielders (BH 179.25 ± 6.126 cm; p = 0.03; BW 68 ± 6.304 kg; p = 0.014) and strikers (BH 176.04 ± 4.998 cm; p = 0.026; BW 68.93 ± 6.591 kg; p = 0.026). Defenders had significantly greater BH (182.14 ± 4.853 cm; p = 0.026) than strikers. Goalkeepers also had a significantly higher BMI than midfielders (23.28 ± 0.698 vs. 21.14 ± 1.282 kg/m2; p = 0.02) and greater epicondylar width of the humerus (EWH 7.36 ± 0.14 cm) compared to strikers (EWH 6.79 ± 0.308 cm; p = 0.014). The average somatotype values identified goalkeepers [2.0-4.1-3.1], defenders [1.6-3.9-3.2], and strikers [1.7-4.2-2.9] as ectomorphic mesomorphs, while midfielders were identified as mesomorph-ectomorphs [1.6-3.7-3.6].

Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of somatotype in player position suitability and its impact on physical attributes in football.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从前锋到守门员:斯洛伐克足球运动员的体型。
背景/目的:本研究旨在分析和比较斯洛伐克职业足球运动员和非运动员的体型:方法:根据选定的人体测量参数、体型成分以及使用希斯-卡特方法得出的体型,对平均年龄为 16.88 ± 1.29 岁的职业足球运动员的位置进行比较分析,包括守门员(n = 4;8%)、后卫(n = 16;32%)、前锋(n = 15;30%)和中场(n = 15;30%):结果:足球运动员的平均体型被归类为外胚层中胚层体型(40%)。守门员的身高(BH 187.98 ± 3.166 厘米)和体重(BW 82.33 ± 4.922 千克)明显高于中场球员(BH 179.25 ± 6.126 厘米;p = 0.03;BW 68 ± 6.304 千克;p = 0.014)和前锋(BH 176.04 ± 4.998 厘米;p = 0.026;BW 68.93 ± 6.591 千克;p = 0.026)。后卫的 BH 值(182.14 ± 4.853 厘米;p = 0.026)明显高于前锋。守门员的体重指数也明显高于中场球员(23.28 ± 0.698 vs. 21.14 ± 1.282 kg/m2;p = 0.02),肱骨外上髁宽度(EWH 7.36 ± 0.14 厘米)也大于前锋(EWH 6.79 ± 0.308 厘米;p = 0.014)。平均体型值确定守门员[2.0-4.1-3.1]、后卫[1.6-3.9-3.2]和前锋[1.7-4.2-2.9]为外型中胚层,而中场球员被确定为中胚层-外胚层[1.6-3.7-3.6]:研究结果凸显了体型在足球运动员位置适宜性中的重要性及其对身体素质的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports
Sports SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
167
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of Weighted Vest Sprint Training on Mid-Acceleration and Reactive Strength in Post-PHV Soccer Players. Effect of Acute Caffeine Intake on Maximal Aerobic Speed in University Soccer Players Assessed by the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test. Preseason Body Composition Phenotypes and In-Season Injury Burden in Male Professional Basketball: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ageing, Sex Differences, and REDs Risk in Endurance Runners: An Integrated Cross-Sectional Study Protocol. Somatometric, Training, and Behavioral Profiles of Resistance Training Practitioners and Recreational Exercisers in Greece: A Multivariate Comparative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1