The diagnostic accuracy of exosomes for glioma: A meta-analysis.

0 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomolecules & biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.17305/bb.2024.11268
XiangMin Zhang, YanDi Tan, XiaoYa He, Jie Huang, XiaoYing Ni, Qian Hu, JinHua Cai
{"title":"The diagnostic accuracy of exosomes for glioma: A meta-analysis.","authors":"XiangMin Zhang, YanDi Tan, XiaoYa He, Jie Huang, XiaoYing Ni, Qian Hu, JinHua Cai","doi":"10.17305/bb.2024.11268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glioma is one of the most prevalent primary intracranial tumors, and biomarker testing offers a non-invasive modality with high diagnostic efficiency. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of exosomes as biomarkers for glioma. We included 16 studies on exosomes as biomarkers for gliomas. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) for 25 biomarkers across these 16 studies were as follows: 82% (95% CI: 0.77-0.86), 91% (95% CI: 0.86-0.94), 9.10 (95% CI: 5.64-14.68), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.16-0.25), 45.94 (95% CI: 25.40-83.09), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), respectively. Meta-regression indicated that biomarker analysis, biomarker type, and sample size may be sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis suggested that ultracentrifugation (UC) was a better method for extracting exosomes. miRNA and other RNA groups (sncRNA, lncRNA, circRNA) provided higher SEN (0.88 vs. 0.84 vs. 0.78) compared to proteins. This study demonstrates the superior diagnostic efficacy of exosomes as biomarkers for gliomas, with high accuracy in diagnosing gliomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2024.11268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glioma is one of the most prevalent primary intracranial tumors, and biomarker testing offers a non-invasive modality with high diagnostic efficiency. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of exosomes as biomarkers for glioma. We included 16 studies on exosomes as biomarkers for gliomas. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) for 25 biomarkers across these 16 studies were as follows: 82% (95% CI: 0.77-0.86), 91% (95% CI: 0.86-0.94), 9.10 (95% CI: 5.64-14.68), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.16-0.25), 45.94 (95% CI: 25.40-83.09), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), respectively. Meta-regression indicated that biomarker analysis, biomarker type, and sample size may be sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis suggested that ultracentrifugation (UC) was a better method for extracting exosomes. miRNA and other RNA groups (sncRNA, lncRNA, circRNA) provided higher SEN (0.88 vs. 0.84 vs. 0.78) compared to proteins. This study demonstrates the superior diagnostic efficacy of exosomes as biomarkers for gliomas, with high accuracy in diagnosing gliomas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外泌体对胶质瘤的诊断准确性:荟萃分析
胶质瘤是发病率最高的颅内原发性肿瘤之一,生物标志物检测是一种诊断效率高的无创方式。本荟萃分析旨在评估外泌体作为胶质瘤生物标志物的诊断效果。我们纳入了16项关于外泌体作为胶质瘤生物标志物的研究。这16项研究中25种生物标志物的集合敏感性(SEN)、特异性(SPE)、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、诊断几率比(DOR)和曲线下面积(AUC)如下:分别为:82%(95% CI:0.77-0.86)、91%(95% CI:0.86-0.94)、9.10(95% CI:5.64-14.68)、0.20(95% CI:0.16-0.25)、45.94(95% CI:25.40-83.09)和 0.92(95% CI:0.89-0.94)。元回归表明,生物标志物分析、生物标志物类型和样本大小可能是异质性的来源。与蛋白质相比,miRNA 和其他 RNA 组(sncRNA、lncRNA、circRNA)提供了更高的 SEN(0.88 vs. 0.84 vs. 0.78)。这项研究证明了外泌体作为胶质瘤生物标记物的卓越诊断功效,在诊断胶质瘤方面具有很高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic effects of chlorogenic acid on allergic rhinitis through TLR4/MAPK/NF-κB pathway modulation. Silencing FOXA1 suppresses inflammation caused by LPS and promotes osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells through the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway. Systemic immune-inflammation index and the short-term mortality of patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis. hUC-MSC extracellular vesicles protect against hypoxic-ischemic brain injury by promoting NLRP3 ubiquitination. N6-methyladenosine methylation regulators can serve as potential biomarkers for endometriosis related infertility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1