What is the IPCC's assessment style and what shaped it?

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.18095.1
Gabriel Târziu
{"title":"What is the IPCC's assessment style and what shaped it?","authors":"Gabriel Târziu","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.18095.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is one of the best-known global expert organizations. Its main objective is to supply policymakers with policy-relevant recent scientific information about climate change. The way in which the IPCC is obtaining this information is called an assessment. But assessments can be performed in a wide variety of ways. An important step, then, in understanding what this important organization does and why, is to figure out what characterizes the particular type of assessment it performs. The main objective of this paper is to contribute to the literature dedicated to understanding the work of IPCC by outlining the characteristics of the IPCC's assessment style and providing an in-depth analysis of the factors that have contributed to its development. As it will be argued here, understanding the climate-scientific-specific obstacles that had to be overcome by the IPCC in the process of pursuing its objectives is crucial for understanding why the IPCC is performing the type of assessment that it does and also for understanding some of the most important controversies associated with it.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"4 ","pages":"172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18095.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is one of the best-known global expert organizations. Its main objective is to supply policymakers with policy-relevant recent scientific information about climate change. The way in which the IPCC is obtaining this information is called an assessment. But assessments can be performed in a wide variety of ways. An important step, then, in understanding what this important organization does and why, is to figure out what characterizes the particular type of assessment it performs. The main objective of this paper is to contribute to the literature dedicated to understanding the work of IPCC by outlining the characteristics of the IPCC's assessment style and providing an in-depth analysis of the factors that have contributed to its development. As it will be argued here, understanding the climate-scientific-specific obstacles that had to be overcome by the IPCC in the process of pursuing its objectives is crucial for understanding why the IPCC is performing the type of assessment that it does and also for understanding some of the most important controversies associated with it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IPCC 的评估风格是什么?
政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)是全球最著名的专家组织之一。其主要目标是向政策制定者提供与政策相关的最新气候变化科学信息。IPCC 获取这些信息的方式称为评估。但评估的方式多种多样。因此,要了解这个重要组织的工作内容和原因,一个重要的步骤就是要弄清楚它所进行的特定类型评估的特点是什么。本文的主要目的是通过概述政府间气候变化专门委员会评估风格的特点,并深入分析促进其发展的因素,为专门了解政府间气候变化专门委员会工作的文献做出贡献。正如本文将论证的那样,理解 IPCC 在实现其目标的过程中必须克服的气候科学障碍,对于理解 IPCC 为什么要进行这样的评估,以及理解与之相关的一些最重要的争议都至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Co-designing ab initio electronic structure methods on a RISC-V vector architecture. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Unveiling Maternal Health Dynamics from Pregnancy Through Postpartum Perspectives. Antibiotics in honey: a comprehensive review on occurrence and analytical methodologies. Challenges to ethical public engagement in research funding: a perspective from practice. Environmental impacts of drugs against parasitic vector-borne diseases and the need to integrate sustainability into their development and use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1