Advanced trends in detecting boldenone, its metabolites, and precursors in biological matrices: an integrative review of chromatographic methods

IF 2.7 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical Methods Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1039/D4AY01528B
Sandra Milena Mendoza Sanabria, Paola Andrea Cárdenas, Geison Modesti Costa, Izabel Almeida Alves and Diana Marcela Aragón
{"title":"Advanced trends in detecting boldenone, its metabolites, and precursors in biological matrices: an integrative review of chromatographic methods","authors":"Sandra Milena Mendoza Sanabria, Paola Andrea Cárdenas, Geison Modesti Costa, Izabel Almeida Alves and Diana Marcela Aragón","doi":"10.1039/D4AY01528B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Boldenone (BOL) has been frequently detected in doping and food safety over the past few decades. Researchers have studied BOL metabolism across various species, reporting significant differences even within the same species due to variations in experimental designs and analytical methods. Additionally, detection methods face challenges such as matrix interferences and the presence of endogenous structural analogs at low concentrations. This study aims to compile and analyze the development of chromatographic techniques for detecting BOL and its metabolites in biological matrices. An integrative review of literature from May 2000 to September 2024 was conducted using databases like PubMed, ScienceDirect, Elsevier, Springer, Scopus, Wiley, and Taylor &amp; Francis. The MeSH terms ‘boldenone’ AND ‘detection,’ restricted to titles or abstracts, yielded 167 records, with 79 meeting the inclusion criteria. Hyphenated techniques (<em>e.g.</em>, LC/MS/MS and GC/C/IRMS) were predominantly used and generally successful in identifying BOL, its precursors, and metabolites, particularly in characterizing their endogenous origin or differentiating isomers. Urine was the most commonly observed matrix, and solid-phase extraction (SPE) was the predominant extraction technique. Future research should aim to improve extraction and detection methods to address current discrepancies in controlling BOL use, as its pharmacological properties have led to negative repercussions in sports and concerns about food safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":64,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Methods","volume":" 44","pages":" 7436-7459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ay/d4ay01528b","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Boldenone (BOL) has been frequently detected in doping and food safety over the past few decades. Researchers have studied BOL metabolism across various species, reporting significant differences even within the same species due to variations in experimental designs and analytical methods. Additionally, detection methods face challenges such as matrix interferences and the presence of endogenous structural analogs at low concentrations. This study aims to compile and analyze the development of chromatographic techniques for detecting BOL and its metabolites in biological matrices. An integrative review of literature from May 2000 to September 2024 was conducted using databases like PubMed, ScienceDirect, Elsevier, Springer, Scopus, Wiley, and Taylor & Francis. The MeSH terms ‘boldenone’ AND ‘detection,’ restricted to titles or abstracts, yielded 167 records, with 79 meeting the inclusion criteria. Hyphenated techniques (e.g., LC/MS/MS and GC/C/IRMS) were predominantly used and generally successful in identifying BOL, its precursors, and metabolites, particularly in characterizing their endogenous origin or differentiating isomers. Urine was the most commonly observed matrix, and solid-phase extraction (SPE) was the predominant extraction technique. Future research should aim to improve extraction and detection methods to address current discrepancies in controlling BOL use, as its pharmacological properties have led to negative repercussions in sports and concerns about food safety.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检测生物基质中的勃地酮、其代谢物和前体的先进趋势:色谱法综述。
在过去几十年中,勃地酮(BOL)经常在兴奋剂和食品安全方面被检测到。研究人员对不同物种的勃地酮代谢进行了研究,由于实验设计和分析方法的不同,即使在同一物种中也存在显著差异。此外,检测方法还面临着基质干扰和低浓度内源性结构类似物存在等挑战。本研究旨在汇编和分析用于检测生物基质中 BOL 及其代谢物的色谱技术的发展情况。本研究使用 PubMed、ScienceDirect、Elsevier、Springer、Scopus、Wiley 和 Taylor & Francis 等数据库对 2000 年 5 月至 2024 年 9 月期间的文献进行了综合综述。MeSH术语 "boldenone "和 "检测 "仅限于标题或摘要,共获得167条记录,其中79条符合纳入标准。在鉴定 BOL、其前体和代谢物方面,尤其是在鉴定其内源性来源或区分异构体方面,主要使用了联用技术(如 LC/MS/MS 和 GC/C/IRMS),并且普遍取得了成功。尿液是最常见的观察基质,固相萃取(SPE)是最主要的萃取技术。由于 BOL 的药理特性已导致体育运动中的负面影响和对食品安全的担忧,未来的研究应致力于改进提取和检测方法,以解决目前在控制 BOL 使用方面存在的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Methods
Analytical Methods CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
569
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Early applied demonstrations of new analytical methods with clear societal impact
期刊最新文献
A multi-functional platform for stimulating and recording electrical responses of SH-SY5Y cells. Smartphone-assisted colorimetric detection of nickel(II) ions using a novel benzothiazole-quinoline dyad in semi-aqueous media. Back cover A highly lipophilic terpyridine ligand as an efficient fluorescent probe for the selective detection of zinc(II) ions under biological conditions. Aptasensor based on entropy-driven catalytic amplification system for the sensitive detection of acetamiprid in Chinese herbal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1