Clinical genome sequencing in patients with suspected rare genetic disease in Peru.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY NPJ Genomic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1038/s41525-024-00434-8
Jeny Bazalar-Montoya, Mario Cornejo-Olivas, Milagros M Duenas-Roque, Nelson Purizaca-Rosillo, Richard S Rodriguez, Karina Milla-Neyra, Carlos A De La Torre-Hernandez, Elison Sarapura-Castro, Carolina I Galarreta Aima, Gioconda Manassero-Morales, Giulliana Chávez-Pasco, Luis Celis-García, Jorge E La Serna-Infantes, Evgenii Chekalin, Erin Thorpe, Ryan J Taft
{"title":"Clinical genome sequencing in patients with suspected rare genetic disease in Peru.","authors":"Jeny Bazalar-Montoya, Mario Cornejo-Olivas, Milagros M Duenas-Roque, Nelson Purizaca-Rosillo, Richard S Rodriguez, Karina Milla-Neyra, Carlos A De La Torre-Hernandez, Elison Sarapura-Castro, Carolina I Galarreta Aima, Gioconda Manassero-Morales, Giulliana Chávez-Pasco, Luis Celis-García, Jorge E La Serna-Infantes, Evgenii Chekalin, Erin Thorpe, Ryan J Taft","doi":"10.1038/s41525-024-00434-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is limited access to molecular genetic testing in most low- and middle-income countries. The iHope program provides clinical genome sequencing (cGS) to underserved individuals with signs or symptoms of rare genetic diseases and limited or no access to molecular genetic testing. Here we describe the performance and impact of cGS in 247 patients from three clinics in Peru. Although most patients had at least one genetic test prior to cGS (70.9%), the most frequent was karyotyping (53.4%). The diagnostic yield of cGS was 54.3%, with candidate variants reported in an additional 22.3% of patients. Clinical GS results impacted clinician diagnostic evaluation in 85.0% and genetic counseling in 72.1% of cases. Changes in management were reported in 71.3%, inclusive of referrals (64.7%), therapeutics (26.3%), laboratory or physiological testing (25.5%), imaging (19%), and palliative care (17.4%), suggesting that increased availability of genomic testing in Peru would enable improved patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19273,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11519459/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Genomic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-024-00434-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is limited access to molecular genetic testing in most low- and middle-income countries. The iHope program provides clinical genome sequencing (cGS) to underserved individuals with signs or symptoms of rare genetic diseases and limited or no access to molecular genetic testing. Here we describe the performance and impact of cGS in 247 patients from three clinics in Peru. Although most patients had at least one genetic test prior to cGS (70.9%), the most frequent was karyotyping (53.4%). The diagnostic yield of cGS was 54.3%, with candidate variants reported in an additional 22.3% of patients. Clinical GS results impacted clinician diagnostic evaluation in 85.0% and genetic counseling in 72.1% of cases. Changes in management were reported in 71.3%, inclusive of referrals (64.7%), therapeutics (26.3%), laboratory or physiological testing (25.5%), imaging (19%), and palliative care (17.4%), suggesting that increased availability of genomic testing in Peru would enable improved patient management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秘鲁疑似罕见遗传病患者的临床基因组测序。
在大多数中低收入国家,接受分子基因检测的机会有限。iHope 计划为服务不足、有罕见遗传病症状或体征、接受分子基因检测的机会有限或根本没有机会接受检测的患者提供临床基因组测序(cGS)服务。在此,我们描述了 cGS 在秘鲁三家诊所 247 名患者中的表现和影响。尽管大多数患者在 cGS 之前至少做过一次基因检测(70.9%),但最常见的是核型检测(53.4%)。cGS 的诊断率为 54.3%,另有 22.3% 的患者报告了候选变异。临床 GS 结果影响了 85.0% 的临床医生诊断评估和 72.1% 的遗传咨询。71.3%的病例报告了管理方面的变化,包括转诊(64.7%)、治疗(26.3%)、实验室或生理检测(25.5%)、成像(19%)和姑息治疗(17.4%),这表明在秘鲁增加基因组检测的可用性将有助于改善患者管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Genomic Medicine
NPJ Genomic Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
67
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Genomic Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing the most important scientific advances in all aspects of genomics and its application in the practice of medicine. The journal defines genomic medicine as "diagnosis, prognosis, prevention and/or treatment of disease and disorders of the mind and body, using approaches informed or enabled by knowledge of the genome and the molecules it encodes." Relevant and high-impact papers that encompass studies of individuals, families, or populations are considered for publication. An emphasis will include coupling detailed phenotype and genome sequencing information, both enabled by new technologies and informatics, to delineate the underlying aetiology of disease. Clinical recommendations and/or guidelines of how that data should be used in the clinical management of those patients in the study, and others, are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Common protein-altering variant in GFAP is associated with white matter lesions in the older Japanese population. Benchmarking nanopore sequencing and rapid genomics feasibility: validation at a quaternary hospital in New Zealand. Coding and non-coding variants in the ciliopathy gene CFAP410 cause early-onset non-syndromic retinal degeneration. Biallelic loss-of-function variants in GON4L cause microcephaly and brain structure abnormalities. Genomic variations associated with risk and protection against vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in pediatric cancer patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1