Development and validation of a method for deriving MMPI-3 scores from MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF item responses.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1037/pas0001341
Jacob R Brown, William H Menton, Yossef S Ben-Porath
{"title":"Development and validation of a method for deriving MMPI-3 scores from MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF item responses.","authors":"Jacob R Brown, William H Menton, Yossef S Ben-Porath","doi":"10.1037/pas0001341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2020a) was developed to expand the content coverage of the MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008/2011) and to update the test's norms to better represent the U.S. population. Because most MMPI-3 items were carried over from the MMPI-2-RF, most MMPI-3 scales can be either fully scored or prorated from the MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF item pool. We describe development of a procedure for deriving MMPI-3 scores from MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF protocols and examine the psychometric properties of prorated MMPI-3 scores across various samples. Following Tarescavage et al. (2016), who developed a method for prorating most MMPI-2-RF scores from the original MMPI, prorated MMPI-3 scales had to meet three criteria: (a) sufficient representation in the MMPI-2-RF item pool, (b) association with the full-length corresponding MMPI-3 scale at <i>r</i> ≥ .90 in multiple samples, and (c) comparable T score means and standard deviations in multiple samples. These criteria resulted in the exclusion of the three MMPI-3 non-content-based Validity Scales, as well as nine Specific Problems Scales, yielding 16 MMPI-3 scales that can be fully scored and 24 for which psychometrically comparable prorated score estimates can be derived from responses to the MMPI-2 or MMPI-2-RF item pools. Evidence of the psychometric functioning of the resulting scale scores and their comparability with the full versions of these scales across samples is presented and discussed. This procedure provides a means to study 40 of the 52 MMPI-3 scales using archival data obtained with older versions of the inventory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"36 11","pages":"665-679"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001341","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2020a) was developed to expand the content coverage of the MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008/2011) and to update the test's norms to better represent the U.S. population. Because most MMPI-3 items were carried over from the MMPI-2-RF, most MMPI-3 scales can be either fully scored or prorated from the MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF item pool. We describe development of a procedure for deriving MMPI-3 scores from MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF protocols and examine the psychometric properties of prorated MMPI-3 scores across various samples. Following Tarescavage et al. (2016), who developed a method for prorating most MMPI-2-RF scores from the original MMPI, prorated MMPI-3 scales had to meet three criteria: (a) sufficient representation in the MMPI-2-RF item pool, (b) association with the full-length corresponding MMPI-3 scale at r ≥ .90 in multiple samples, and (c) comparable T score means and standard deviations in multiple samples. These criteria resulted in the exclusion of the three MMPI-3 non-content-based Validity Scales, as well as nine Specific Problems Scales, yielding 16 MMPI-3 scales that can be fully scored and 24 for which psychometrically comparable prorated score estimates can be derived from responses to the MMPI-2 or MMPI-2-RF item pools. Evidence of the psychometric functioning of the resulting scale scores and their comparability with the full versions of these scales across samples is presented and discussed. This procedure provides a means to study 40 of the 52 MMPI-3 scales using archival data obtained with older versions of the inventory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF 项目反应得出 MMPI-3 分数的方法的开发和验证。
明尼苏达多相人格量表-3(MMPI-3;Ben-Porath & Tellegen,2020a)的开发是为了扩大MMPI-2-RF(MMPI-2-RF;Ben-Porath & Tellegen,2008/2011)的内容覆盖面,并更新测试的标准,以更好地代表美国人口。由于大多数MMPI-3项目是从MMPI-2-RF中延续下来的,因此大多数MMPI-3量表都可以从MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF项目库中进行满分或按比例计算。我们介绍了从MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF协议中得出MMPI-3分数的程序开发,并研究了不同样本中按比例计算的MMPI-3分数的心理测量特性。Tarescavage 等人(2016 年)从原始 MMPI 中开发了一种按比例计算大多数 MMPI-2-RF 分数的方法,按照这种方法,按比例计算的 MMPI-3 量表必须满足三个标准:(a) 在 MMPI-2-RF 项目库中有足够的代表性;(b) 在多个样本中与全长的相应 MMPI-3 量表的相关性 r≥.90 ;(c) 在多个样本中具有可比的 T 分数平均值和标准差。根据这些标准,排除了 3 个不基于内容的 MMPI-3 有效性量表和 9 个特殊问题量表,得出 16 个可完全计分的 MMPI-3 量表和 24 个可根据对 MMPI-2 或 MMPI-2-RF 项目库的反应得出心理计量学上可比的按比例估分的量表。本文介绍并讨论了所得到的量表分数的心理测量功能及其与这些量表在不同样本中的完整版本的可比性。该程序提供了一种使用旧版本量表获得的档案数据研究 52 个 MMPI-3 量表中的 40 个量表的方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a method for deriving MMPI-3 scores from MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF item responses. Evaluation of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) Unlikely Virtues Scale in the detection of underreporting. Prospectively predicting violent and aggressive incidents in prison practice with the Risk Screener Violence (RS-V): Results from a multisite prison study. Development of the Food Addiction Symptom Inventory: The first clinical interview to assess ultra-processed food addiction. Does the Bayley-4 measure the same constructs across girls and boys and infants, toddlers, and preschoolers?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1