Lyme disease in UK primary care: a knowledge, attitude and practice survey.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0092
Lucy Delaney, Amanda Semper, Neil French, John Sp Tulloch
{"title":"Lyme disease in UK primary care: a knowledge, attitude and practice survey.","authors":"Lucy Delaney, Amanda Semper, Neil French, John Sp Tulloch","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lyme disease (LD) cases in the UK most commonly present within the primary care setting. Despite an upward trend of incidence, little is known regarding general practitioner (GP) experience with diagnosis and treatment.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to describe baseline primary care clinician Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) in Scotland and England.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Online KAP survey on Lyme disease for UK based practising GPs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online KAP questionnaire was developed for use in UK primary care. The survey was distributed through UK based research networks, professional societies and via social media.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>191 complete responses were analysed (England <i>n</i>=130, Scotland <i>n</i>=61). The Scotland-based respondent group had more relevant consultations in the previous 3 years. Respondents from Scotland demonstrated a greater awareness that erythema migrans (EM) is pathognomonic for Lyme disease and that serological testing of this patient group is not indicated. Less common cardiac and neurological symptoms were not as well associated with Lyme disease by both respondent groups for the former and England-based respondents for the latter. Prescribing according to the National institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance was identified in 70% of Scotland and 42% of England-based GP responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Targeted resources may improve clinician confidence on exposure risk, symptom recognition, testing limitations and treatment dose and duration. Scotland-based respondents' better survey performance potentially reflects greater clinical exposure and public awareness of the disease, due to high endemicity within the nation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lyme disease (LD) cases in the UK most commonly present within the primary care setting. Despite an upward trend of incidence, little is known regarding general practitioner (GP) experience with diagnosis and treatment.

Aim: This study aims to describe baseline primary care clinician Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) in Scotland and England.

Design & setting: Online KAP survey on Lyme disease for UK based practising GPs.

Method: An online KAP questionnaire was developed for use in UK primary care. The survey was distributed through UK based research networks, professional societies and via social media.

Results: 191 complete responses were analysed (England n=130, Scotland n=61). The Scotland-based respondent group had more relevant consultations in the previous 3 years. Respondents from Scotland demonstrated a greater awareness that erythema migrans (EM) is pathognomonic for Lyme disease and that serological testing of this patient group is not indicated. Less common cardiac and neurological symptoms were not as well associated with Lyme disease by both respondent groups for the former and England-based respondents for the latter. Prescribing according to the National institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance was identified in 70% of Scotland and 42% of England-based GP responses.

Conclusion: Targeted resources may improve clinician confidence on exposure risk, symptom recognition, testing limitations and treatment dose and duration. Scotland-based respondents' better survey performance potentially reflects greater clinical exposure and public awareness of the disease, due to high endemicity within the nation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国初级保健中的莱姆病:知识、态度和实践调查。
背景:在英国,莱姆病(LD)病例最常出现在基层医疗机构。尽管发病率呈上升趋势,但人们对全科医生(GP)的诊断和治疗经验知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在描述苏格兰和英格兰全科医生的知识、态度和实践(KAP)基线:针对英国执业全科医生的莱姆病在线 KAP 调查:方法:为英国初级医疗机构开发了一份在线 KAP 问卷。调查通过英国的研究网络、专业协会和社交媒体发布:对 191 份完整的答复进行了分析(英格兰为 130 份,苏格兰为 61 份)。苏格兰的受访者在过去 3 年中接受过更多相关咨询。苏格兰的受访者更清楚地认识到,偏头痛红斑(EM)是莱姆病的病理标志,不需要对这一患者群体进行血清学检测。对于前者,两个受访群体都没有将不太常见的心脏和神经系统症状与莱姆病联系起来,而对于后者,英格兰的受访者也没有将其与莱姆病联系起来。70%的苏格兰全科医生和42%的英格兰全科医生在答复中指出,应根据美国国家卫生与护理卓越研究所(NICE)的指导开具处方:有针对性的资源可提高临床医生对暴露风险、症状识别、检测限制以及治疗剂量和持续时间的信心。苏格兰的受访者在调查中表现较好,这可能反映出由于该疾病在苏格兰的高流行率,临床接触该疾病的机会更多,公众对该疾病的认识也更深刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the experiences, understandings, and expectations of exacerbations of patients with COPD and their carers: an interview study. Primary care-based interventions for secondary prevention of opioid dependence in patients with chronic non-cancer pain taking pharmaceutical opioids: a systematic review. How, when, and who should ask about pregnancy intentions in primary care? A qualitative study of primary healthcare professionals' preferences. Improving discharge summaries from hospital with a brief recommendation text box: results from a nationwide survey. Integrating public health and primary care: a framework for seamless collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1