FOCUS DWI and Deep Learning Reconstruction in breast MRI: A comparison with conventional DWI

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101543
Mrs. Yue Ming , Prof Jiayu Sun , Mrs. Fan Yang , Dr Huilou Liang , Mr. Bo Zhang
{"title":"FOCUS DWI and Deep Learning Reconstruction in breast MRI: A comparison with conventional DWI","authors":"Mrs. Yue Ming ,&nbsp;Prof Jiayu Sun ,&nbsp;Mrs. Fan Yang ,&nbsp;Dr Huilou Liang ,&nbsp;Mr. Bo Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To employ deep-learning based reconstruction (DLR) to improve the SNR of FOCUS DWI for breast imaging in Asian patients and investigate the feasibility and performance of reduced-FOV FOCUS DWI and FOCUS DWI with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for breast MRI in Asian patients with small breast volumes.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Forty-nine female patients suspected of having breast cancer from July 2023 to December 2023. They underwent breast MRI examinations using three sequences: Conventional DWI, Focus DWI, Focus-DLR DWI. Two radiologists independently assessed image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. They also outlined the lesions, calculating the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the lesion, the Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) between the lesion and surrounding tissue, and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) of the lesion. Image scores, SNR, CNR and ADC were compared using the Friedman test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>FOCUS-DLR DWI had higher scores in terms of the overall image quality, the anatomical details, lesion conspicuity, artifacts and distortion than conventional DWI (P&lt;0.001, P&lt;0.001, P&lt;0.001, P&lt;0.001, P&lt;0.001). The SNR of FOCUS-DLR DWI was higher than that of conventional DWI and FOCUS DWI (P&lt;0.001, P&lt;0.001), while there were no statistically significant differences between FOCUS-DWI and conventional DWI(P&gt;0.05). What's more, in terms of CNR values and ADC values, there were no significant difference among three sequences.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings indicate that FOCUS DWI with deep learning-based reconstruction produces superior images than conventional DWI, enhancing the applicability of this technique in clinical practice. Deep learning-based reconstruction provides a new direction for optimizing DWI imaging techniques in Asian breast MRI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939865424002741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To employ deep-learning based reconstruction (DLR) to improve the SNR of FOCUS DWI for breast imaging in Asian patients and investigate the feasibility and performance of reduced-FOV FOCUS DWI and FOCUS DWI with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for breast MRI in Asian patients with small breast volumes.

Materials and Methods

Forty-nine female patients suspected of having breast cancer from July 2023 to December 2023. They underwent breast MRI examinations using three sequences: Conventional DWI, Focus DWI, Focus-DLR DWI. Two radiologists independently assessed image quality using a 5-point Likert scale. They also outlined the lesions, calculating the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the lesion, the Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) between the lesion and surrounding tissue, and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) of the lesion. Image scores, SNR, CNR and ADC were compared using the Friedman test.

Results

FOCUS-DLR DWI had higher scores in terms of the overall image quality, the anatomical details, lesion conspicuity, artifacts and distortion than conventional DWI (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001). The SNR of FOCUS-DLR DWI was higher than that of conventional DWI and FOCUS DWI (P<0.001, P<0.001), while there were no statistically significant differences between FOCUS-DWI and conventional DWI(P>0.05). What's more, in terms of CNR values and ADC values, there were no significant difference among three sequences.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that FOCUS DWI with deep learning-based reconstruction produces superior images than conventional DWI, enhancing the applicability of this technique in clinical practice. Deep learning-based reconstruction provides a new direction for optimizing DWI imaging techniques in Asian breast MRI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺 MRI 中的 FOCUS DWI 和深度学习重建:与传统 DWI 的比较
目的采用基于深度学习的重建(DLR)提高亚洲患者乳腺成像中 FOCUS DWI 的信噪比,并研究缩小 FOV 的 FOCUS DWI 和基于深度学习的重建(DLR)的 FOCUS DWI 在乳腺体积较小的亚洲患者中用于乳腺 MRI 的可行性和性能。她们接受了三种序列的乳腺 MRI 检查:传统 DWI、聚焦 DWI 和聚焦-DLR DWI。两名放射科医生使用 5 点李克特量表独立评估图像质量。他们还对病灶进行了勾画,计算了病灶的信噪比(SNR)、病灶与周围组织的对比噪比(CNR)以及病灶的表观扩散系数(ADC)。结果FOCUS-DLR DWI 在整体图像质量、解剖细节、病变清晰度、伪影和失真方面的得分均高于传统 DWI(P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001,P<0.001)。FOCUS-DLR DWI的信噪比高于传统DWI和FOCUS DWI(P<0.001, P<0.001),而FOCUS-DWI与传统DWI之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论我们的研究结果表明,基于深度学习重建的 FOCUS DWI 可生成优于传统 DWI 的图像,提高了该技术在临床实践中的适用性。基于深度学习的重建为优化亚洲乳腺磁共振成像中的 DWI 成像技术提供了新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
231
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.
期刊最新文献
A bibliometric analysis on research authorship and collaboration patterns in radiography professional journals: A 10-year review The design and construct a website for collection and report diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in diagnostic radiography Beyond the Machine: A Radiographer's Tale Innovative Learning Activities to Prepare Radiography Students for Final-Year Clinical Placements: An Educational Perspective Enhancing radiation therapy student's cultural competency and safety of Canadian Indigenous populations using cultural immersion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1