Causal associations of insulin and Lp(a) levels: a Mendelian randomization study

IF 37.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2834
M Lejawa, M Golawski, M Fronczek, T Osadnik, N Pawlas, M Lisik, F Paneni, M Ruscica, J Jozwiak, M Gierlotka, M Banach
{"title":"Causal associations of insulin and Lp(a) levels: a Mendelian randomization study","authors":"M Lejawa, M Golawski, M Fronczek, T Osadnik, N Pawlas, M Lisik, F Paneni, M Ruscica, J Jozwiak, M Gierlotka, M Banach","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Numerous observational studies have demonstrated circulating lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to be inversely related to occurrence of type 2 diabetes [T2D]. However, this is not consistently supported by Mendelian randomization [MR] studies. In vitro studies have shown insulin to downregulate Lp(a) expression, which might be another mechanism behind the correlation observed between Lp(a) and T2D. Purpose In this MR study, we investigated the influence of genetically predicted levels of insulin on genetically predicted Lp(a) levels to elucidate the potential causal links between Lp(a) and diabetes. Methods Independent genetic variants associated with insulin levels were acquired from a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS, N=151,013). Summary data for Lp(a) were acquired from a GWAS study in the UK Biobank (N=361,194). Inverse-variance-weighted (IVM) method was used to perform a two sample MR study. Sensitivity analysis was conducted via MR Egger, weighted median (WME), as well as leave-one-out analysis. Results Genetically predicted insulin levels were negatively associated with Lp(a) levels according to IVM estimate (p=0.003). In sensitivity analysis, WME supported this result (p=0.0002), while MR-Egger was not statistically significant (p=0.11). Leave-one-out analysis did not show the results to depend on any single variant. Conclusion This MR study provides robust evidence supporting the association between plasma insulin levels and decreased Lp(a) concentration. These findings suggest that hyperinsulinemia triggered by insulin resistance can be in part responsible for the observed negative correlation between low Lp(a) and T2D risk. Figure 1. Genetic associations between insulin levels and Lp(a). Each genetic variant included in the analysis is represented as a point + 95% CI. Localization on the horizontal axis represents the correlation of the variant with exposure (plasma fasting insulin, inverse variance normal transformed values). Localization on the vertical axis represents the correlation of the variant with outcome (Lp(a), natural log transformed values). Lines represent estimates of different MR methods.Figure 1.","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2834","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Numerous observational studies have demonstrated circulating lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to be inversely related to occurrence of type 2 diabetes [T2D]. However, this is not consistently supported by Mendelian randomization [MR] studies. In vitro studies have shown insulin to downregulate Lp(a) expression, which might be another mechanism behind the correlation observed between Lp(a) and T2D. Purpose In this MR study, we investigated the influence of genetically predicted levels of insulin on genetically predicted Lp(a) levels to elucidate the potential causal links between Lp(a) and diabetes. Methods Independent genetic variants associated with insulin levels were acquired from a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS, N=151,013). Summary data for Lp(a) were acquired from a GWAS study in the UK Biobank (N=361,194). Inverse-variance-weighted (IVM) method was used to perform a two sample MR study. Sensitivity analysis was conducted via MR Egger, weighted median (WME), as well as leave-one-out analysis. Results Genetically predicted insulin levels were negatively associated with Lp(a) levels according to IVM estimate (p=0.003). In sensitivity analysis, WME supported this result (p=0.0002), while MR-Egger was not statistically significant (p=0.11). Leave-one-out analysis did not show the results to depend on any single variant. Conclusion This MR study provides robust evidence supporting the association between plasma insulin levels and decreased Lp(a) concentration. These findings suggest that hyperinsulinemia triggered by insulin resistance can be in part responsible for the observed negative correlation between low Lp(a) and T2D risk. Figure 1. Genetic associations between insulin levels and Lp(a). Each genetic variant included in the analysis is represented as a point + 95% CI. Localization on the horizontal axis represents the correlation of the variant with exposure (plasma fasting insulin, inverse variance normal transformed values). Localization on the vertical axis represents the correlation of the variant with outcome (Lp(a), natural log transformed values). Lines represent estimates of different MR methods.Figure 1.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰岛素与脂蛋白(a)水平的因果关系:孟德尔随机研究
背景 大量观察性研究表明,循环中的脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]与 2 型糖尿病[T2D]的发生率成反比。然而,孟德尔随机[MR]研究并不一致地支持这一观点。体外研究表明,胰岛素能下调脂蛋白(a)的表达,这可能是观察到脂蛋白(a)与 T2D 之间相关性的另一种机制。目的 在这项磁共振研究中,我们调查了基因预测的胰岛素水平对基因预测的脂蛋白(a)水平的影响,以阐明脂蛋白(a)与糖尿病之间的潜在因果关系。方法 从一项全基因组关联研究(GWAS,N=151,013)的荟萃分析中获得了与胰岛素水平相关的独立遗传变异。脂蛋白(a)的汇总数据来自英国生物库(UK Biobank)的一项全基因组关联研究(GWAS,N=361,194)。使用反方差加权(IVM)方法进行了双样本 MR 研究。通过 MR Egger、加权中位数 (WME) 以及剔除分析进行了敏感性分析。结果 根据 IVM 估计值,遗传预测的胰岛素水平与脂蛋白(a)水平呈负相关(p=0.003)。在敏感性分析中,WME支持这一结果(p=0.0002),而MR-Egger在统计学上并不显著(p=0.11)。撇除分析表明,结果并不取决于任何单一变异。结论 这项 MR 研究提供了强有力的证据,支持血浆胰岛素水平与脂蛋白(a)浓度下降之间的关联。这些研究结果表明,胰岛素抵抗引发的高胰岛素血症可能是观察到的低脂蛋白(a)与 T2D 风险之间负相关的部分原因。图 1.胰岛素水平与脂蛋白(a)之间的遗传关联。分析中包含的每个遗传变异均以点 + 95% CI 表示。横轴上的定位表示变异与暴露(血浆空腹胰岛素,反方差正态转换值)的相关性。纵轴上的定位表示变异体与结果(脂蛋白(a),自然对数转换值)的相关性。线条代表不同 MR 方法的估计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: A novel tool for arrhythmic risk stratification in desmoplakin gene variant carriers. The humanized platelet glycoprotein VI Fab inhibitor EMA601 protects from arterial thrombosis and ischaemic stroke in mice. Optical coherence tomography predictors of clinical outcomes after stent implantation: the ILUMIEN IV trial. The SEX-SHOCK score-the emperor's new clothes? Weekly Journal Scan: A large Chinese SPRINT supports 'the lower, the better' blood pressure in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1