Stripping down sustainability assessments for easier comparison of innovative recycling options

Erik Dekker , Joris T.K. Quik , Michelle A. Steenmeijer , Johannes P.A. Lijzen
{"title":"Stripping down sustainability assessments for easier comparison of innovative recycling options","authors":"Erik Dekker ,&nbsp;Joris T.K. Quik ,&nbsp;Michelle A. Steenmeijer ,&nbsp;Johannes P.A. Lijzen","doi":"10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this short communication we propose a screening approach for assessing the sustainability of new recycling options. Before performing a full comparative LCA it is useful to perform a simplified LCA because of the lower data intensity. The impact categories are limited to greenhouse gas emissions and land use. As an example car tire recycling is shown. This screening approach is already useful for decision makers and can be used by stakeholders to compare innovative with the baseline technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100256,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Waste Systems","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Waste Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772912524000514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this short communication we propose a screening approach for assessing the sustainability of new recycling options. Before performing a full comparative LCA it is useful to perform a simplified LCA because of the lower data intensity. The impact categories are limited to greenhouse gas emissions and land use. As an example car tire recycling is shown. This screening approach is already useful for decision makers and can be used by stakeholders to compare innovative with the baseline technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简化可持续性评估,便于比较创新的回收利用方案
在这篇短文中,我们提出了一种筛选方法,用于评估新回收方案的可持续性。在进行全面的生命周期评估比较之前,由于数据强度较低,进行简化的生命周期评估是非常有用的。影响类别仅限于温室气体排放和土地使用。以汽车轮胎回收为例。这种筛选方法对决策者已经非常有用,利益相关者也可利用这种方法将创新技术与基准技术进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transforming waste into strength: Evaluating properties of concrete with waste glass substitution Quantification and characterization of municipal solid waste at aler dumpsite, Lira City, Uganda: Assessing pollution levels and health risks Stripping down sustainability assessments for easier comparison of innovative recycling options Enhancing performance of construction waste management: Factor analysis from the building contractors’ perspectives Food waste separation intention among the residential students: Moderation role of university support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1