The Cancer-Specific Health Economic Measure QLU-C10D is Valid and Responsive for Assessing Health Utility in Patients with Thyroid Cancer.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Thyroid Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1089/thy.2024.0396
Micha J Pilz, Simone Seyringer, Susanne Singer, Georgios Ioannidis, Gerasimos P Sykiotis, Juan I Arraras, Olga Husson, Ioannis Iakovou, Giuseppe Fanetti, Dagmar Führer, Johanna Inhestern, Naomi Kiyota, Laura Deborah Locati, Monica Pinto, Ricardo Ribeiro Gama, Madeleine T King, Richard Norman, Eva M Gamper
{"title":"The Cancer-Specific Health Economic Measure QLU-C10D is Valid and Responsive for Assessing Health Utility in Patients with Thyroid Cancer.","authors":"Micha J Pilz, Simone Seyringer, Susanne Singer, Georgios Ioannidis, Gerasimos P Sykiotis, Juan I Arraras, Olga Husson, Ioannis Iakovou, Giuseppe Fanetti, Dagmar Führer, Johanna Inhestern, Naomi Kiyota, Laura Deborah Locati, Monica Pinto, Ricardo Ribeiro Gama, Madeleine T King, Richard Norman, Eva M Gamper","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Health economic appraisals often rely on the assessment of health utilities using preference-based measures (PBM). The cancer-specific PBM, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility - Core 10 Dimensions (EORTC QLU-C10D), was developed recently, and now needs to be validated in various clinical populations. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a multicenter, multinational prospective cohort study, we longitudinally collected EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L data from patients with thyroid cancer. We applied seven country-specific value sets to the QLQ-C30 data to derive country-specific utility values and used the EQ-5D-5L as a comparator PBM. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating index scores and Bland-Altman plots. Construct validity was investigated by correlating domain scores. Known-group comparisons and responsiveness were assessed using external clinical criteria. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 181 patients with thyroid cancer from nine countries (three continents) provided analyzable data. Patients were included if they had differentiated, medullary, or anaplastic thyroid cancer. Mean utility values of both instruments were generally lower compared to general population norms. No floor or ceiling effects were present for the QLU-C10D. The intra-class correlation for EQ-5D-5L and QLU-C10D index values ranged from 0.761 to 0.901 across the measurement timepoints, supporting criterion validity. Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.289 to 0.716 for theoretically corresponding domain pairs. The QLU-C10D detected differences in 9 of 15 known-group comparisons, supporting sensitivity. Clinically important changes were detected by all QLU-C10D country specific value sets, supporting responsiveness. Further, the QLU-C10D had higher statistical efficiency than the EQ-5D-5L in 74.7% of comparisons. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The QLU-C10D is a valid PBM for health economic evaluations in thyroid cancer studies. We recommend its use to estimate health utilities in economic evaluations of thyroid cancer therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"1356-1370"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0396","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health economic appraisals often rely on the assessment of health utilities using preference-based measures (PBM). The cancer-specific PBM, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility - Core 10 Dimensions (EORTC QLU-C10D), was developed recently, and now needs to be validated in various clinical populations. Methods: In a multicenter, multinational prospective cohort study, we longitudinally collected EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L data from patients with thyroid cancer. We applied seven country-specific value sets to the QLQ-C30 data to derive country-specific utility values and used the EQ-5D-5L as a comparator PBM. Criterion validity was assessed by correlating index scores and Bland-Altman plots. Construct validity was investigated by correlating domain scores. Known-group comparisons and responsiveness were assessed using external clinical criteria. Results: A total of 181 patients with thyroid cancer from nine countries (three continents) provided analyzable data. Patients were included if they had differentiated, medullary, or anaplastic thyroid cancer. Mean utility values of both instruments were generally lower compared to general population norms. No floor or ceiling effects were present for the QLU-C10D. The intra-class correlation for EQ-5D-5L and QLU-C10D index values ranged from 0.761 to 0.901 across the measurement timepoints, supporting criterion validity. Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.289 to 0.716 for theoretically corresponding domain pairs. The QLU-C10D detected differences in 9 of 15 known-group comparisons, supporting sensitivity. Clinically important changes were detected by all QLU-C10D country specific value sets, supporting responsiveness. Further, the QLU-C10D had higher statistical efficiency than the EQ-5D-5L in 74.7% of comparisons. Conclusions: The QLU-C10D is a valid PBM for health economic evaluations in thyroid cancer studies. We recommend its use to estimate health utilities in economic evaluations of thyroid cancer therapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症特定健康经济学测量 QLU-C10D 在评估甲状腺癌患者的健康效用方面具有有效性和响应性。
背景:健康经济评估通常依赖于使用基于偏好的测量方法(PBM)对健康效用进行评估。欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织(EORTC)最近开发了癌症专用的 PBM--欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量效用核心 10 维度(EORTC QLU-C10D),现在需要在各种临床人群中进行验证。方法:在一项多中心、跨国前瞻性队列研究中,我们纵向收集了甲状腺癌患者的 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 EQ-5D-5L 数据。我们在 QLQ-C30 数据中应用了七个国家的特定值集,以得出各国的效用值,并使用 EQ-5D-5L 作为参照 PBM。标准有效性通过相关指数得分和布兰-阿尔特曼图进行评估。结构效度则通过相关领域得分进行研究。采用外部临床标准对已知组比较和响应性进行了评估。结果共有来自九个国家(三大洲)的 181 名甲状腺癌患者提供了可分析的数据。分化型、髓样型或无细胞型甲状腺癌患者均被纳入研究范围。与普通人群的标准值相比,两种工具的平均效用值普遍较低。QLU-C10D 没有出现下限或上限效应。在各个测量时间点上,EQ-5D-5L 和 QLU-C10D 指数值的类内相关性从 0.761 到 0.901 不等,支持标准有效性。理论上对应的领域对的斯皮尔曼相关系数为 0.289 至 0.716。在 15 次已知组比较中,QLU-C10D 在 9 次比较中检测到了差异,支持灵敏度。所有 QLU-C10D 国家特定值集都能检测到具有临床意义的变化,支持了响应性。此外,在 74.7% 的比较中,QLU-C10D 的统计效率高于 EQ-5D-5L。结论:QLU-C10D 是一种有效的 PBM,可用于甲状腺癌研究中的健康经济评估。我们建议在甲状腺癌疗法的经济评估中使用它来估算健康效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
期刊最新文献
Examining Why Thyroid Cancer Incidence Is High in Women. Differential Ultrasound Rates Mirror Sex Disparities in Thyroid Cancer. Irwin Klein, MD (1946-2024). Surgical and Pathological Challenges in Thyroidectomy after Thermal Ablation of Thyroid Nodules. Association Between Environmental Air Pollution and Thyroid Cancer and Nodules: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1