Correlation between forceps grasp count and skill proficiency in single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure: A retrospective single-center study

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1111/ases.13403
Yohei Sanmoto, Akio Kawami, Yudai Goto, Takahiro Jimbo, Chikashi Gotoh, Kouji Masumoto
{"title":"Correlation between forceps grasp count and skill proficiency in single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure: A retrospective single-center study","authors":"Yohei Sanmoto,&nbsp;Akio Kawami,&nbsp;Yudai Goto,&nbsp;Takahiro Jimbo,&nbsp;Chikashi Gotoh,&nbsp;Kouji Masumoto","doi":"10.1111/ases.13403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the correlation between forceps grasp count and procedure time in single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure surgeries and the evolution of these metrics with accumulated experience.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively reviewed 741 procedures performed by surgeons between 2015 and 2023. Surgical videos were analyzed to calculate the procedure time, defined as the time required for suturing around the hernial orifice, and the forceps grasp count. Correlations were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Changes in experience were assessed using linear regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Surgeons demonstrated a significantly longer procedure time (585 s vs. 437 s, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) and higher grasp counts (22 times vs. 17 times, <i>p</i> &lt; .001) for surgeries performed on male patients than on female patients. Grasp count was strongly correlated with procedure time (male patients: <i>r</i> = .800; female patients: <i>r</i> = .758, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). With accumulated experience, both procedure time and grasp count decreased, although novice surgeons showed delayed improvement in forceps manipulation compared with improvement in procedure time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Grasp count was strongly correlated with procedure time in single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure. Accumulated experience improved both metrics, with novice surgeons possibly requiring more time to acquire efficient forceps manipulation skills. Efficient forceps manipulation is a valuable metric for evaluating surgical skills.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.13403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between forceps grasp count and procedure time in single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure surgeries and the evolution of these metrics with accumulated experience.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 741 procedures performed by surgeons between 2015 and 2023. Surgical videos were analyzed to calculate the procedure time, defined as the time required for suturing around the hernial orifice, and the forceps grasp count. Correlations were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Changes in experience were assessed using linear regression.

Results

Surgeons demonstrated a significantly longer procedure time (585 s vs. 437 s, p < .001) and higher grasp counts (22 times vs. 17 times, p < .001) for surgeries performed on male patients than on female patients. Grasp count was strongly correlated with procedure time (male patients: r = .800; female patients: r = .758, p < .001). With accumulated experience, both procedure time and grasp count decreased, although novice surgeons showed delayed improvement in forceps manipulation compared with improvement in procedure time.

Conclusion

Grasp count was strongly correlated with procedure time in single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure. Accumulated experience improved both metrics, with novice surgeons possibly requiring more time to acquire efficient forceps manipulation skills. Efficient forceps manipulation is a valuable metric for evaluating surgical skills.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单切口腹腔镜经皮腹膜外缝合术中镊子抓取次数与技术熟练程度的相关性:单中心回顾性研究。
简介:本研究旨在探讨单切口腹腔镜经皮腹膜外腔闭合手术中镊子抓取次数与手术时间之间的相关性,以及这些指标随经验积累而发生的变化:我们回顾性审查了外科医生在 2015 年至 2023 年期间实施的 741 例手术。我们分析了手术视频,以计算手术时间(定义为缝合疝孔周围所需的时间)和镊子抓取次数。相关性采用斯皮尔曼秩相关系数进行评估。使用线性回归评估经验的变化:结果:外科医生的手术时间明显更长(585 秒 vs. 437 秒,p 结论:镊子抓取次数与手术时间密切相关:在单切口腹腔镜经皮腹膜外腔闭合术中,抓取次数与手术时间密切相关。新手外科医生可能需要更多时间掌握高效的镊子操作技能。高效的镊子操作是评估手术技能的重要指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
Staple Formation by Endostapler and Bronchial Wall Thickness in Pulmonary Lobectomy: A Prospective Observational Study Response to Comment on "Intraoperative Verbal Communication in Pediatric Single-Incision Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure: A Comprehensive Analysis and Educational Implications". Management of Median Arcuate Ligament Compression in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Consensus Statements. Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Extended Reality in Thoracic Surgery: Japanese Expert Recommendations From the Anatomy on the Border Expert Consensus Meeting. Robotic Liver Resection With Scope Transition Technique: A Single-Center Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1