Assessing community awareness and participation in health facility governing committees in two districts of Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Archives of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1186/s13690-024-01415-0
Hussein Athuman Kapuya, Stephen Oswald Maluka, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Miguel San Sebastian
{"title":"Assessing community awareness and participation in health facility governing committees in two districts of Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Hussein Athuman Kapuya, Stephen Oswald Maluka, Anna-Karin Hurtig, Miguel San Sebastian","doi":"10.1186/s13690-024-01415-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tanzania has been promoting community participation in health, either directly or through health facility governing committees (HFGCs), as part of its wider, ongoing health system reforms since the 1990s. Although some studies have assessed the functioning of the HFGCs, little is known about community knowledge and involvement in their activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey assessing community awareness and participation in HFGCs was conducted between July and October 2022, involving two rural districts of Tanzania, which were selected based on their performance: Handeni, showing low performance and Mbarali, high performance. A total of 1,184 household heads living in the catchment areas of diverse facilities were involved. Frequencies and percentages were calculated overall and by district. The Chi-squared test was applied to assess statistically significant differences in knowledge, awareness, and participation between the districts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that 85.3% of the participants were unaware of the presence of the HFGCs and 91.7% did not know their roles. Additionally, 87% had neither heard nor seen any announcement about the selection of committee members. Only 14.5% considered that HFGCs were accountable to the community. While 96.7% of the respondents said they had never received any feedback from the HFGCs, only 8.1% reported that HFGCs were collecting views from the community. Regarding participation, 79.9% believed that the community had not been supporting their activities; however, 44.7% believed that the committees were important in improving health service delivery. Feedback and support were more common in Handeni.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level of community awareness of and participation in HFGCs was very low in both districts. The Ministry of Health and the President's Office of Regional Administration and Local Government should implement an action plan to raise community awareness of the role of the HFGCs and their significance in promoting social accountability within the Tanzanian health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"82 1","pages":"194"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-024-01415-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tanzania has been promoting community participation in health, either directly or through health facility governing committees (HFGCs), as part of its wider, ongoing health system reforms since the 1990s. Although some studies have assessed the functioning of the HFGCs, little is known about community knowledge and involvement in their activities.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey assessing community awareness and participation in HFGCs was conducted between July and October 2022, involving two rural districts of Tanzania, which were selected based on their performance: Handeni, showing low performance and Mbarali, high performance. A total of 1,184 household heads living in the catchment areas of diverse facilities were involved. Frequencies and percentages were calculated overall and by district. The Chi-squared test was applied to assess statistically significant differences in knowledge, awareness, and participation between the districts.

Results: The results revealed that 85.3% of the participants were unaware of the presence of the HFGCs and 91.7% did not know their roles. Additionally, 87% had neither heard nor seen any announcement about the selection of committee members. Only 14.5% considered that HFGCs were accountable to the community. While 96.7% of the respondents said they had never received any feedback from the HFGCs, only 8.1% reported that HFGCs were collecting views from the community. Regarding participation, 79.9% believed that the community had not been supporting their activities; however, 44.7% believed that the committees were important in improving health service delivery. Feedback and support were more common in Handeni.

Conclusion: The level of community awareness of and participation in HFGCs was very low in both districts. The Ministry of Health and the President's Office of Regional Administration and Local Government should implement an action plan to raise community awareness of the role of the HFGCs and their significance in promoting social accountability within the Tanzanian health system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估坦桑尼亚两个地区社区对医疗机构管理委员会的认识和参与情况:一项横断面研究。
背景:自 20 世纪 90 年代以来,坦桑尼亚一直在推动社区直接或通过医疗机构管理委员会(HFGCs)参与医疗卫生工作,这也是坦桑尼亚正在进行的更广泛的医疗卫生系统改革的一部分。尽管一些研究对医疗机构管理委员会的运作情况进行了评估,但对社区对其活动的了解和参与情况却知之甚少:方法:2022 年 7 月至 10 月期间,我们在坦桑尼亚的两个农村地区开展了一项横断面调查,评估社区对家庭保健中心的认识和参与情况:汉德尼表现较差,姆巴拉利表现较好。共有 1,184 名居住在不同设施集水区的户主参与其中。计算了总体和各地区的频率和百分比。采用卡方检验来评估各地区在知识、意识和参与度方面的显著差异:结果显示,85.3% 的参与者不知道有家庭保健小组的存在,91.7% 的参与者不知道他们的作用。此外,87%的人既没听说过也没看过任何关于委员会成员遴选的公告。仅有 14.5%的受访者认为家庭和社区指导委员会向社区负责。96.7%的受访者表示从未收到过来自家福会的任何反馈,只有 8.1%的受访者表示家福会正在收集社区的意见。在参与方面,79.9%的受访者认为社区没有支持他们的活动;但是,44.7%的受访者认为委员会对改善医疗服务非常重要。在汉德尼,反馈和支持更为普遍:在这两个地区,社区对家庭和社区保健委员会的认识和参与程度都很低。卫生部和总统地区管理和地方政府办公室应实施一项行动计划,提高社区对家庭和社区保健委员会的作用及其在坦桑尼亚卫生系统内促进社会问责制的意义的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
期刊最新文献
Poppers use, adherence to antiretroviral therapy and risky sexual behaviors among HIV-positive men who have sex with men in Chongqing, China. Predictors of survival rates among breast cancer patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2024. Changes in alcohol consumption among Belgian adults participating in the internet-based one-month-abstinence campaign 'Tournée Minérale'. Health loss and economic burden of asthma in China: a qualitative review based on existing literature. Role of cognitive impairment in predicting the long-term risk of all-cause mortality: a 20-year prospective cohort study in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1