Advancing Diabetic Dental Restorations: A Comparative Analysis of Alveolar Bone Loss in Class II Composite Resin Versus Amalgam Fillings.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.72642
Abdo Mohammed Mohammed Abdulrazzaq
{"title":"Advancing Diabetic Dental Restorations: A Comparative Analysis of Alveolar Bone Loss in Class II Composite Resin Versus Amalgam Fillings.","authors":"Abdo Mohammed Mohammed Abdulrazzaq","doi":"10.7759/cureus.72642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction This study evaluated the impact of Class II composite resin and amalgam restorations on alveolar bone loss in diabetic patients, a population more susceptible to periodontal complications. The main objective was to determine whether the choice of restorative material impacts periodontal health, providing insights to optimize dental care for this high-risk group. Materials and methods This observational, comparative. cross-sectional study included 64 diabetic patients, divided into two groups based on their Class II restorations. Group 1 had 32 patients with composite resin restorations, while Group 2 comprised 32 patients with amalgam restorations. Both groups were matched for age and diabetes duration to ensure comparability. Periodontal health, specifically alveolar bone loss, was assessed through clinical and radiographic evaluations. The study analyzed the impact of the two materials on alveolar bone levels. Results Data from 64 diabetic patients (32 in Group 1 and 32 in Group 2) were statistically analyzed using PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0 (Released 2009; SPSS Inc., Chicago, United States). Three statistical tests, descriptive statistics, two-sample t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), were used. The results showed significant differences between the two groups, with composite resin restorations linked to greater alveolar bone loss. Conclusion The choice of restorative material significantly influences periodontal health in diabetic patients. Composite resin restorations were associated with a higher risk of alveolar bone loss and periodontal disease, emphasizing the need for careful material selection and regular periodontal monitoring in diabetic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction This study evaluated the impact of Class II composite resin and amalgam restorations on alveolar bone loss in diabetic patients, a population more susceptible to periodontal complications. The main objective was to determine whether the choice of restorative material impacts periodontal health, providing insights to optimize dental care for this high-risk group. Materials and methods This observational, comparative. cross-sectional study included 64 diabetic patients, divided into two groups based on their Class II restorations. Group 1 had 32 patients with composite resin restorations, while Group 2 comprised 32 patients with amalgam restorations. Both groups were matched for age and diabetes duration to ensure comparability. Periodontal health, specifically alveolar bone loss, was assessed through clinical and radiographic evaluations. The study analyzed the impact of the two materials on alveolar bone levels. Results Data from 64 diabetic patients (32 in Group 1 and 32 in Group 2) were statistically analyzed using PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0 (Released 2009; SPSS Inc., Chicago, United States). Three statistical tests, descriptive statistics, two-sample t-test, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), were used. The results showed significant differences between the two groups, with composite resin restorations linked to greater alveolar bone loss. Conclusion The choice of restorative material significantly influences periodontal health in diabetic patients. Composite resin restorations were associated with a higher risk of alveolar bone loss and periodontal disease, emphasizing the need for careful material selection and regular periodontal monitoring in diabetic patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进糖尿病牙科修复:二类复合树脂与汞合金填料牙槽骨损失的比较分析。
引言 这项研究评估了二类复合树脂和汞合金修复体对糖尿病患者牙槽骨流失的影响,糖尿病患者是牙周并发症的高发人群。主要目的是确定修复材料的选择是否会影响牙周健康,从而为优化这一高风险人群的牙科护理提供见解。材料和方法 这项观察、比较、横断面研究包括 64 名糖尿病患者,根据他们的二级修复体分为两组。第一组有 32 名复合树脂修复体患者,第二组有 32 名汞合金修复体患者。两组患者的年龄和糖尿病病程相匹配,以确保可比性。牙周健康,特别是牙槽骨损失,通过临床和放射学评估进行评估。研究分析了两种材料对牙槽骨水平的影响。结果 使用 PASW Statistics for Windows 18.0 版(2009 年发布;SPSS Inc.使用了三种统计检验方法,即描述性统计、双样本 t 检验和协方差分析 (ANCOVA)。结果显示,两组之间存在明显差异,复合树脂修复体导致牙槽骨流失更多。结论 修复材料的选择对糖尿病患者的牙周健康有很大影响。复合树脂修复与牙槽骨丧失和牙周病的高风险相关,强调了糖尿病患者需要谨慎选择修复材料并定期进行牙周监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Current Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Detection of Its Complications: A Systematic Review. Assessment of Optimal Treatment Strategies and Their Outcomes in T3N1 Rectal Cancers. Effective Pain Management of Postherpetic Neuralgia Using a Combination of Analgesics and Conservative Measures. Evaluation of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes as Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Exacerbation of Hyperbilirubinemia by Falciparum Malaria in a Patient With Coexisting Gilbert's Syndrome and Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1