A Century of Surgical Quality: Origins, Evolution, and Future Directions.

David B Hoyt, Clifford Y Ko, Frank G Opelka
{"title":"A Century of Surgical Quality: Origins, Evolution, and Future Directions.","authors":"David B Hoyt, Clifford Y Ko, Frank G Opelka","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over a century has passed since Ernst A. Codman's pioneering call for surgeons to take open responsibility for patient care, a concept integral to the emergence and leadership of the American College of Surgeons (ACS). Codman's End Result Idea, originating in the early 20th century, laid the groundwork for professional responsibility and accountability in surgical practice, catalyzing the formation of the ACS. His innovative use of the \"end result\" technique at Massachusetts General Hospital highlighted significant variability in surgical outcomes, spurring debates on specialization and accountability. The ACS, under John Bowman's leadership, aimed to ensure optimal care through defined standards and verification mechanisms. Codman's Bone Sarcoma Registry, initiated in 1920, marked an early attempt at quality assessment and improvement through data collection. Despite facing resistance, Codman's vision laid the foundation for modern quality initiatives in surgical care. ACS programs, spanning trauma care to cancer treatment and beyond, have significantly enhanced patient outcomes while reducing costs. Looking forward, advancing surgical quality requires measuring quality, leveraging trusted data, embracing change management, fostering collaboration, and empowering specialists. The future of surgical care depends on collective efforts to uphold standards that ensure optimal care for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"285-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over a century has passed since Ernst A. Codman's pioneering call for surgeons to take open responsibility for patient care, a concept integral to the emergence and leadership of the American College of Surgeons (ACS). Codman's End Result Idea, originating in the early 20th century, laid the groundwork for professional responsibility and accountability in surgical practice, catalyzing the formation of the ACS. His innovative use of the "end result" technique at Massachusetts General Hospital highlighted significant variability in surgical outcomes, spurring debates on specialization and accountability. The ACS, under John Bowman's leadership, aimed to ensure optimal care through defined standards and verification mechanisms. Codman's Bone Sarcoma Registry, initiated in 1920, marked an early attempt at quality assessment and improvement through data collection. Despite facing resistance, Codman's vision laid the foundation for modern quality initiatives in surgical care. ACS programs, spanning trauma care to cancer treatment and beyond, have significantly enhanced patient outcomes while reducing costs. Looking forward, advancing surgical quality requires measuring quality, leveraging trusted data, embracing change management, fostering collaboration, and empowering specialists. The future of surgical care depends on collective efforts to uphold standards that ensure optimal care for all.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
百年外科质量:起源、演变和未来方向。
自恩斯特-科德曼(Ernst A. Codman)率先呼吁外科医生公开承担患者护理责任以来,一个多世纪过去了,这一理念与美国外科医生学会(ACS)的出现和领导力密不可分。科德曼的 "最终结果理念 "起源于 20 世纪初,它为外科实践中的职业责任和问责制奠定了基础,促进了美国外科学院的成立。他在马萨诸塞州总医院创新性地使用了 "最终结果 "技术,凸显了手术结果的显著差异,引发了关于专业化和问责制的争论。在约翰-鲍曼的领导下,ACS旨在通过明确的标准和验证机制来确保最佳护理。科德曼于 1920 年发起的骨肉瘤登记处标志着通过数据收集进行质量评估和改进的早期尝试。尽管面临重重阻力,但科德曼的愿景为现代外科护理质量计划奠定了基础。ACS 计划横跨创伤护理、癌症治疗等多个领域,在降低成本的同时显著提高了患者的治疗效果。展望未来,提高手术质量需要衡量质量、利用可信数据、接受变革管理、促进合作并赋予专家权力。外科护理的未来有赖于大家共同努力,坚持确保为所有人提供最佳护理的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Complications of Ambulatory Procedures: Prevalence and Hospital Outpatient Department Variation. From Data to Improvement: Social Mechanisms as a Key to Understanding Dashboard Adoption. A Checklist to Improve Acute Stroke Evaluation and Treatment in the Emergency Department. Depression and Distress Screening in Oncology Patients: A Descriptive Analysis. Is Pathogen Molecular Testing Reshaping Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1