Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: conservative management - intraluminal adjuvant therapy, and surveillance.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Current Opinion in Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000001240
Rinat Lasmanovich, Asaf Shvero, Nir Kleinmann
{"title":"Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: conservative management - intraluminal adjuvant therapy, and surveillance.","authors":"Rinat Lasmanovich, Asaf Shvero, Nir Kleinmann","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In recent years, intraluminal therapies have become a valid alternative for low grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients, as overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates were shown to be comparable to those achieved with radical nephroureterectomy for selected cases. Nonetheless, endoscopic treatment has its limitations. As technology progresses and the demand for endoscopic treatments increases, intraluminal chemotherapy and immunotherapy instillations within the upper tract have increasingly become the subject areas of research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The main intraluminal therapies and relevant instillation approaches are reviewed in this study, including recent publications and their main outcomes. The recurrence rates demonstrated in the literature strengthen the notion that patients with UTUC following current intraluminal treatments have a better prognosis than in the past. Updated relevant guidelines regarding surveillance among this population are also reviewed and summarized.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma is clinically challenging. Developments in recent years show promising results in this field and ongoing research with new developments is emerging. Further studies are required to better understand the contribution of intraluminal therapies to the management of this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"68-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001240","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: In recent years, intraluminal therapies have become a valid alternative for low grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients, as overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates were shown to be comparable to those achieved with radical nephroureterectomy for selected cases. Nonetheless, endoscopic treatment has its limitations. As technology progresses and the demand for endoscopic treatments increases, intraluminal chemotherapy and immunotherapy instillations within the upper tract have increasingly become the subject areas of research.

Recent findings: The main intraluminal therapies and relevant instillation approaches are reviewed in this study, including recent publications and their main outcomes. The recurrence rates demonstrated in the literature strengthen the notion that patients with UTUC following current intraluminal treatments have a better prognosis than in the past. Updated relevant guidelines regarding surveillance among this population are also reviewed and summarized.

Summary: The treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma is clinically challenging. Developments in recent years show promising results in this field and ongoing research with new developments is emerging. Further studies are required to better understand the contribution of intraluminal therapies to the management of this disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上尿路尿路上皮癌:保守治疗--腔内辅助治疗和监测。
综述目的:近年来,腔内疗法已成为低级别上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)患者的一种有效替代疗法,因为经证实,在某些病例中,腔内疗法的总生存率和癌症特异性生存率可与根治性肾切除术相媲美。然而,内窥镜治疗也有其局限性。随着技术的进步和对内镜治疗需求的增加,腔内化疗和上消化道免疫疗法的灌注日益成为研究领域的主题:本研究综述了主要的腔内疗法和相关灌注方法,包括近期发表的论文及其主要成果。文献中显示的复发率加强了这样一种观点,即UTUC患者在接受目前的腔内治疗后,预后比过去更好。摘要:上尿路尿路癌的治疗在临床上具有挑战性。近年来的发展表明该领域取得了可喜的成果,并且正在进行的研究也有了新的进展。要更好地了解腔内疗法对治疗这种疾病的贡献,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
期刊最新文献
Medical therapy for male infertility. A narrative review on the performance and outcomes of penile and scrotal surgery in the ambulatory setting. The role of MRI in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an update from the last two years. Prostatectomy and other local treatments for oligometastatic prostate cancer: recent and ongoing trials. The changing landscape of nonobstructive azoospermia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1