Role of Artificial intelligence model in prediction of low back pain using T2 weighted MRI of Lumbar spine.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics F1000Research Pub Date : 2024-10-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.154680.2
Ali Muhaimil, Saikiran Pendem, Niranjana Sampathilla, Priya P S, Kaushik Nayak, Krishnaraj Chadaga, Anushree Goswami, Obhuli Chandran M, Abhijit Shirlal
{"title":"Role of Artificial intelligence model in prediction of low back pain using T2 weighted MRI of Lumbar spine.","authors":"Ali Muhaimil, Saikiran Pendem, Niranjana Sampathilla, Priya P S, Kaushik Nayak, Krishnaraj Chadaga, Anushree Goswami, Obhuli Chandran M, Abhijit Shirlal","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.154680.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP), the primary cause of disability, is the most common musculoskeletal disorder globally and the primary cause of disability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies are inconclusive and less sensitive for identifying and classifying patients with LBP. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the role of artificial intelligence (AI) models in the prediction of LBP using T2 weighted MRI image of the lumbar spine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective case-control study. A total of 200 MRI patients (100 cases and controls each) referred for lumbar spine and whole spine screening were included. The scans were performed using 3.0 Tesla MRI (United Imaging Healthcare). T2 weighted images of the lumbar spine were segmented to extract radiomic features. Machine learning (ML) models, such as random forest, decision tree, logistic regression, K-nearest neighbors, adaboost, and deep learning methods (DL), such as ResNet and GoogleNet, were used, and performance measures were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study showed that Random forest and AdaBoost are the most reliable ML models for predicting LBP. Random forest showed high performance with area under curve (AUC) values from 0.83 to 0.88 across all lumbar vertebrae and L2-L3, L3-L4, and L4-L5 intervertebral discs (IVDs), with AUCs of 0.88 the highest at L5-S1 IVD (0.92). Adaboost demonstrated high performance at the L2-L5 vertebrae with AUC values of 0.82 to 0.90, with the highest AUC (0.97) at the L5-S1 IVD. Among the DL models, GoogleNet outperformed the other models at 30 epochs with an accuracy of 0.85, followed by ResNet 18 (30 epochs) with an accuracy of 0.84.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrated that ML and DL models can effectively predict LBP from MRI T2 weighted image of the lumbar spine. ML and DL models could also enhance the diagnostic accuracy of LBP, potentially leading to better patient management and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"1035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11525099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.154680.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP), the primary cause of disability, is the most common musculoskeletal disorder globally and the primary cause of disability. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies are inconclusive and less sensitive for identifying and classifying patients with LBP. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the role of artificial intelligence (AI) models in the prediction of LBP using T2 weighted MRI image of the lumbar spine.

Methods: This was a prospective case-control study. A total of 200 MRI patients (100 cases and controls each) referred for lumbar spine and whole spine screening were included. The scans were performed using 3.0 Tesla MRI (United Imaging Healthcare). T2 weighted images of the lumbar spine were segmented to extract radiomic features. Machine learning (ML) models, such as random forest, decision tree, logistic regression, K-nearest neighbors, adaboost, and deep learning methods (DL), such as ResNet and GoogleNet, were used, and performance measures were calculated.

Results: Our study showed that Random forest and AdaBoost are the most reliable ML models for predicting LBP. Random forest showed high performance with area under curve (AUC) values from 0.83 to 0.88 across all lumbar vertebrae and L2-L3, L3-L4, and L4-L5 intervertebral discs (IVDs), with AUCs of 0.88 the highest at L5-S1 IVD (0.92). Adaboost demonstrated high performance at the L2-L5 vertebrae with AUC values of 0.82 to 0.90, with the highest AUC (0.97) at the L5-S1 IVD. Among the DL models, GoogleNet outperformed the other models at 30 epochs with an accuracy of 0.85, followed by ResNet 18 (30 epochs) with an accuracy of 0.84.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated that ML and DL models can effectively predict LBP from MRI T2 weighted image of the lumbar spine. ML and DL models could also enhance the diagnostic accuracy of LBP, potentially leading to better patient management and outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能模型在利用腰椎 T2 加权磁共振成像预测腰背痛中的作用。
背景:腰背痛(LBP)是全球最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,也是导致残疾的主要原因。磁共振成像(MRI)研究对腰背痛患者的识别和分类并不确定,敏感度也较低。因此,本研究旨在研究人工智能(AI)模型在使用腰椎T2加权磁共振成像预测枸杞多糖症中的作用:这是一项前瞻性病例对照研究。共纳入了 200 名接受腰椎和整个脊柱筛查的 MRI 患者(病例和对照各 100 名)。扫描使用 3.0 特斯拉核磁共振成像技术(United Imaging Healthcare)进行。对腰椎的 T2 加权图像进行分割以提取放射学特征。使用了随机森林、决策树、逻辑回归、K-近邻、adaboost 等机器学习(ML)模型,以及 ResNet 和 GoogleNet 等深度学习方法(DL),并计算了性能指标:研究表明,随机森林和 AdaBoost 是预测枸杞多糖的最可靠的 ML 模型。随机森林在所有腰椎和 L2-L3、L3-L4 和 L4-L5 椎间盘(IVDs)上都表现出较高的性能,曲线下面积(AUC)值从 0.83 到 0.88 不等,其中 L5-S1 椎间盘(IVDs)的 AUC 值最高,为 0.88(0.92)。Adaboost 在 L2-L5 椎骨处表现出很高的性能,AUC 值为 0.82 至 0.90,其中 L5-S1 IVD 的 AUC 值最高(0.97)。在DL模型中,GoogleNet在30个epochs的准确率为0.85,优于其他模型,其次是ResNet 18(30个epochs),准确率为0.84:研究表明,ML 和 DL 模型能有效地通过腰椎 MRI T2 加权图像预测枸杞痛。ML 和 DL 模型还能提高腰椎病的诊断准确性,从而改善患者的管理和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
期刊最新文献
Household resilience of women migrant worker sellers of Jamu Gendong. Identification of compounds from natural Peruvian sources as potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro mutations by virtual screening and computational simulations. Clust&See3.0 : clustering, module exploration and annotation. Health care workers hospitalized for COVID-19 in Liberia: who were they, and what were their outcomes? Post-pubertal management of undescended testes from the malignancy risk point of view: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1