Integrated Water Management Under Different Water Rights Institutions and Population Patterns: Methodology and Application

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water Resources Research Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1029/2024wr037196
Ahmed A. Gharib, Mazdak Arabi, Christopher Goemans, Dale T. Manning, Alexander Maas
{"title":"Integrated Water Management Under Different Water Rights Institutions and Population Patterns: Methodology and Application","authors":"Ahmed A. Gharib, Mazdak Arabi, Christopher Goemans, Dale T. Manning, Alexander Maas","doi":"10.1029/2024wr037196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While numerous studies have investigated demand management policies as a means of mitigating the impacts of climate change and population growth, little attention has been given to the interaction of spatial population patterns and water institutions that affect water shortages. In this article, we develop a methodology to evaluate how population location under alternative water institutions and climate scenarios impacts water demands, shortages, and derived economic values. We apply this methodology to the South Platte River Basin (SPRB) in Northeastern Colorado under three scenarios with ∼1,800 simulations. Results suggest that while water rights institutions have a negligible impact on total volumetric shortages relative to climate change, they have substantial distributional and economic implications. Results also suggest that continuous population growth in upstream cities yields the lowest water shortages if per capita use decreases with urbanization. However, if we assume that per capita demands do not decrease with population density, an equal distribution of population to upstream and downstream regions yields the lowest water shortage and highest economic value. These findings indicate the need that planning efforts must account for return flows and development patterns throughout a watershed in order to reduce water shortages and promote economic prosperity.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr037196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While numerous studies have investigated demand management policies as a means of mitigating the impacts of climate change and population growth, little attention has been given to the interaction of spatial population patterns and water institutions that affect water shortages. In this article, we develop a methodology to evaluate how population location under alternative water institutions and climate scenarios impacts water demands, shortages, and derived economic values. We apply this methodology to the South Platte River Basin (SPRB) in Northeastern Colorado under three scenarios with ∼1,800 simulations. Results suggest that while water rights institutions have a negligible impact on total volumetric shortages relative to climate change, they have substantial distributional and economic implications. Results also suggest that continuous population growth in upstream cities yields the lowest water shortages if per capita use decreases with urbanization. However, if we assume that per capita demands do not decrease with population density, an equal distribution of population to upstream and downstream regions yields the lowest water shortage and highest economic value. These findings indicate the need that planning efforts must account for return flows and development patterns throughout a watershed in order to reduce water shortages and promote economic prosperity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同水权制度和人口模式下的水资源综合管理:方法与应用
虽然许多研究都将需求管理政策作为减轻气候变化和人口增长影响的一种手段,但很少有人关注影响水资源短缺的人口空间模式和水资源制度之间的相互作用。在本文中,我们开发了一种方法来评估在其他水资源制度和气候情景下人口位置如何影响水资源需求、短缺和衍生经济价值。我们将该方法应用于科罗拉多州东北部的南普拉特河流域(SPRB),在三种情景下进行了 1,800 次模拟。结果表明,虽然相对于气候变化而言,水权制度对总水量短缺的影响微乎其微,但却对分配和经济产生了重大影响。结果还表明,如果人均用水量随着城市化的发展而减少,上游城市人口的持续增长会产生最低的水资源短缺。然而,如果我们假设人均需求量不会随着人口密度的增加而减少,那么人口在上游和下游地区的平均分布会产生最低的缺水量和最高的经济价值。这些发现表明,规划工作必须考虑整个流域的回流和发展模式,以减少水资源短缺,促进经济繁荣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
期刊最新文献
A Three-Stage Partitioning Framework for Modeling Mean Annual Groundwater Evapotranspiration Causal Discovery Analysis Reveals Global Sources of Predictability for Regional Flash Droughts Bridging the Gap Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Climate Vulnerability Assessments: Process Informed Exploratory Scenarios Identify System-Based Water Resource Vulnerabilities Combining a Multi-Lake Model Ensemble and a Multi-Domain CORDEX Climate Data Ensemble for Assessing Climate Change Impacts on Lake Sevan Impact of Forest Dieback on Hydrology and Nitrogen Export Using a New Dynamic Water Quality Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1