Association of Smoking with Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3 to 5: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Health data science Pub Date : 2024-11-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34133/hds.0199
Zhilong Zhang, Feifei Zhang, Xiaomeng Zhang, Lanlan Lu, Luxia Zhang
{"title":"Association of Smoking with Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3 to 5: A Mendelian Randomization Study.","authors":"Zhilong Zhang, Feifei Zhang, Xiaomeng Zhang, Lanlan Lu, Luxia Zhang","doi":"10.34133/hds.0199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Previous studies suggested that smoking behavior (e.g., smoking status) was associated with an elevated risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet whether this association is causal remains uncertain. <b>Methods:</b> We used data for half million participants aged 40 to 69 years from the UK Biobank cohort. In the traditional observational study, we used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate the associations between 2 smoking indices-smoking status and lifetime smoking index and incident CKD stages 3 to 5. Mendelian randomization (MR) approaches were used to estimate a potential causal effect. In one-sample MR, genetic variants associated with lifetime smoking index were used as instrument variables to examine the causal associations with CKD stages 3 to 5, among 344,255 UK Biobank participants with white British ancestry. We further validated our findings by a two-sample MR analysis using information from the Chronic Kidney Disease Genetics Consortium genome-wide association study. <b>Results:</b> In the traditional observational study, both smoking status [hazard ratio (HR): 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22 to 1.30] and lifetime smoking index (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.24) were positively associated with a higher risk of incident CKD. However, both our one-sample and two-sample MR analyses showed no causal association between lifetime smoking index and CKD (all <i>P</i> > 0.05). The genetic instruments were validated by several statistical tests, and all sensitivity analyses showed similar results with the main model. <b>Conclusion:</b> Evidence from our analyses does not suggest a causal effect of smoking behavior on CKD risk. The positive association presented in the traditional observational study is possibly a result of confounding.</p>","PeriodicalId":73207,"journal":{"name":"Health data science","volume":"4 ","pages":"0199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11532587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health data science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/hds.0199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies suggested that smoking behavior (e.g., smoking status) was associated with an elevated risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet whether this association is causal remains uncertain. Methods: We used data for half million participants aged 40 to 69 years from the UK Biobank cohort. In the traditional observational study, we used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate the associations between 2 smoking indices-smoking status and lifetime smoking index and incident CKD stages 3 to 5. Mendelian randomization (MR) approaches were used to estimate a potential causal effect. In one-sample MR, genetic variants associated with lifetime smoking index were used as instrument variables to examine the causal associations with CKD stages 3 to 5, among 344,255 UK Biobank participants with white British ancestry. We further validated our findings by a two-sample MR analysis using information from the Chronic Kidney Disease Genetics Consortium genome-wide association study. Results: In the traditional observational study, both smoking status [hazard ratio (HR): 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22 to 1.30] and lifetime smoking index (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.24) were positively associated with a higher risk of incident CKD. However, both our one-sample and two-sample MR analyses showed no causal association between lifetime smoking index and CKD (all P > 0.05). The genetic instruments were validated by several statistical tests, and all sensitivity analyses showed similar results with the main model. Conclusion: Evidence from our analyses does not suggest a causal effect of smoking behavior on CKD risk. The positive association presented in the traditional observational study is possibly a result of confounding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸烟与慢性肾脏病 3 至 5 期的关系:孟德尔随机研究。
背景:以前的研究表明,吸烟行为(如吸烟状态)与慢性肾脏病(CKD)风险升高有关,但这种关联是否是因果关系仍不确定。研究方法我们使用了英国生物库队列中 50 万名 40 至 69 岁参与者的数据。在传统的观察性研究中,我们使用 Cox 比例危险模型来计算两个吸烟指数--吸烟状态和终生吸烟指数--与 CKD 3 至 5 期事件之间的关系。孟德尔随机化(MR)方法用于估计潜在的因果效应。在单样本 MR 中,我们将与终生吸烟指数相关的基因变异作为工具变量,在 344,255 名英国生物库参与者(英国白人血统)中检验与 CKD 3 至 5 期的因果关系。我们利用慢性肾脏病遗传学联盟全基因组关联研究的信息,通过双样本 MR 分析进一步验证了我们的研究结果。研究结果在传统的观察性研究中,吸烟状况[危险比(HR):1.26,95% 置信区间(CI):1.22 至 1.30]和终生吸烟指数(HR:1.22,95% CI:1.20 至 1.24)均与较高的慢性肾脏病发病风险呈正相关。然而,我们的单样本和双样本 MR 分析表明,终生吸烟指数与 CKD 之间没有因果关系(所有 P > 0.05)。遗传工具已通过多项统计检验得到验证,所有敏感性分析均显示出与主模型相似的结果。结论我们分析的证据并不表明吸烟行为对 CKD 风险有因果效应。传统观察研究中出现的正相关可能是混杂因素造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-Modal CLIP-Informed Protein Editing. The Burden of Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Young Adults in China: A Secondary Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Federated Learning in Healthcare: A Benchmark Comparison of Engineering and Statistical Approaches for Structured Data Analysis. Robust Meta-Model for Predicting the Likelihood of Receiving Blood Transfusion in Non-traumatic Intensive Care Unit Patients. Survival Disparities among Cancer Patients Based on Mobility Patterns: A Population-Based Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1