Sex differences in upper and lower strength and their association with body composition among university students.

Physical activity and nutrition Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-30 DOI:10.20463/pan.2024.0025
Miguel A Pérez, Gabriela P Urrejola-Contreras, Judith Hernández, Pamela Silva, Maximiliano Torres-Banduc
{"title":"Sex differences in upper and lower strength and their association with body composition among university students.","authors":"Miguel A Pérez, Gabriela P Urrejola-Contreras, Judith Hernández, Pamela Silva, Maximiliano Torres-Banduc","doi":"10.20463/pan.2024.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Sex strongly influences physical performance throughout adolescence, and excess fat mass is associated with several health and performance impairments. This study aimed to evaluate whether variations in strength between men and women dependent on lean mass and body fat content.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, quasi-experimental, non-probabilistic study involved 44 university students (22 men and 22 women, aged 19-29). Handgrip strength (HGS) was measured using an adjustable handgrip dynamometer, body composition was assessed using bioimpedance, and countermovement jumps (CMJ) were measured using a force platform. Data were analyzed using ANOVA to compare HGS and CMJ based on body mass, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was applied to examine the relationships between grip strength, body composition, and jump test performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strength is significantly higher in men compared to women, as is countermovement jump. The strength of women corresponded to over 50% of that of men, whereas the quantity of lean mass in women corresponded to 55% of that of men. We found a significant relationship between strength and lean mass.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the idea that both upper- and lower-body strengths are strongly influenced by lean mass, thereby contributing to sex differences. The primary factor in body composition that explains the disparities in HGS and CMJ between sexes is the proportion of fat mass to lean mass. Finally, the sex disparities observed between body composition and strength depend on lean mass content.</p>","PeriodicalId":74444,"journal":{"name":"Physical activity and nutrition","volume":"28 3","pages":"64-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical activity and nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20463/pan.2024.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Sex strongly influences physical performance throughout adolescence, and excess fat mass is associated with several health and performance impairments. This study aimed to evaluate whether variations in strength between men and women dependent on lean mass and body fat content.

Methods: This cross-sectional, quasi-experimental, non-probabilistic study involved 44 university students (22 men and 22 women, aged 19-29). Handgrip strength (HGS) was measured using an adjustable handgrip dynamometer, body composition was assessed using bioimpedance, and countermovement jumps (CMJ) were measured using a force platform. Data were analyzed using ANOVA to compare HGS and CMJ based on body mass, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was applied to examine the relationships between grip strength, body composition, and jump test performance.

Results: Strength is significantly higher in men compared to women, as is countermovement jump. The strength of women corresponded to over 50% of that of men, whereas the quantity of lean mass in women corresponded to 55% of that of men. We found a significant relationship between strength and lean mass.

Conclusion: This study supports the idea that both upper- and lower-body strengths are strongly influenced by lean mass, thereby contributing to sex differences. The primary factor in body composition that explains the disparities in HGS and CMJ between sexes is the proportion of fat mass to lean mass. Finally, the sex disparities observed between body composition and strength depend on lean mass content.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生上下力量的性别差异及其与身体成分的关系。
目的:性别对整个青春期的体能表现有很大影响,而过多的脂肪与多种健康和体能障碍有关。本研究旨在评估男女之间力量的差异是否取决于瘦体重和体脂含量:这项横断面、准实验、非概率研究涉及 44 名大学生(22 男 22 女,19-29 岁)。使用可调式手握测力计测量手握力量(HGS),使用生物阻抗评估身体成分,使用测力平台测量反向运动跳跃(CMJ)。使用方差分析对数据进行分析,以比较基于体重的 HGS 和 CMJ,并使用皮尔逊相关系数研究握力、身体成分和跳跃测试成绩之间的关系:结果:与女性相比,男性的力量明显更高,反向跳跃也是如此。女性的力量相当于男性的 50%以上,而女性的瘦体重相当于男性的 55%。我们发现力量和瘦体重之间有明显的关系:这项研究支持了这样一种观点,即上半身和下半身力量都深受瘦体重的影响,从而导致了性别差异。身体成分中能解释男女之间 HGS 和 CMJ 差异的主要因素是脂肪量与瘦肉量的比例。最后,在身体成分和力量之间观察到的性别差异取决于瘦体重的含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of rapid weight loss in judo athletes: prevalence, magnitude, effects on performance, risks, and recommendations. Effects of fermented oyster extract supplementation on free fatty acid and liver enzymes in older women with obesity. Effects of wearing a KF94 face mask on performance, perceptual parameters, and physiological responses during resistance exercise. Intra-rater and test-retest reliability of videography observation method to check diversion time in Fukuda step test among college going students. Physical activity and nutrient intake levels according to grip strength among single-household elderly in Korea: data from 2014 and 2019 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1