Assessment of Health Disparities and Sexual Orientation Response Choices Used in Two US National Population-Based Health Surveys, 2020‒2021.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of public health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2024.307839
Nicole F Kahn, Carolyn T Halpern, Dana R Burshell, Stephanie M Hernandez, Kerith J Conron
{"title":"Assessment of Health Disparities and Sexual Orientation Response Choices Used in Two US National Population-Based Health Surveys, 2020‒2021.","authors":"Nicole F Kahn, Carolyn T Halpern, Dana R Burshell, Stephanie M Hernandez, Kerith J Conron","doi":"10.2105/AJPH.2024.307839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives.</b> To (1) compare responses to 2 survey questions designed to measure sexual orientation and (2) understand how variation in responses is associated with mental health. <b>Methods.</b> Data were from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) Sexual Orientation/Gender Identity, Socioeconomic Status, and Health Across the Life Course (SOGI-SES) study (2020-2021) in the United States. We used the adjusted Wald test to compare proportions of respondents who were (1) categorized as heterosexual or straight and sexual minorities using the sexual orientation questions designed for the Add Health study and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and (2) diagnosed with depression or anxiety or panic disorder. <b>Results.</b> The Add Health question detected more than twice as many sexual minority respondents as the NHIS question. Those who responded as sexual minorities to the Add Health question but as heterosexual or straight to the NHIS question, primarily \"mostly heterosexuals,\" had mental health outcomes that were more like those who were consistently classified as sexual minorities versus those consistently classified as heterosexual or straight. <b>Conclusions.</b> Current measures of sexual orientation in national-level surveys may underestimate the sexual minority population and sexual orientation‒related health disparities. <b>Public Health Implications.</b> Results illustrate the need for further research to expand measurement of sexual orientation on population-based health surveys. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. 2024;114(12):1375-1383. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307839).</p>","PeriodicalId":7647,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health","volume":"114 12","pages":"1375-1383"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307839","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. To (1) compare responses to 2 survey questions designed to measure sexual orientation and (2) understand how variation in responses is associated with mental health. Methods. Data were from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) Sexual Orientation/Gender Identity, Socioeconomic Status, and Health Across the Life Course (SOGI-SES) study (2020-2021) in the United States. We used the adjusted Wald test to compare proportions of respondents who were (1) categorized as heterosexual or straight and sexual minorities using the sexual orientation questions designed for the Add Health study and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and (2) diagnosed with depression or anxiety or panic disorder. Results. The Add Health question detected more than twice as many sexual minority respondents as the NHIS question. Those who responded as sexual minorities to the Add Health question but as heterosexual or straight to the NHIS question, primarily "mostly heterosexuals," had mental health outcomes that were more like those who were consistently classified as sexual minorities versus those consistently classified as heterosexual or straight. Conclusions. Current measures of sexual orientation in national-level surveys may underestimate the sexual minority population and sexual orientation‒related health disparities. Public Health Implications. Results illustrate the need for further research to expand measurement of sexual orientation on population-based health surveys. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(12):1375-1383. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307839).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 2020-2021 年两次美国全国人口健康调查中使用的健康差异和性取向应对选择。
目的(1) 比较对两个旨在测量性取向的调查问题的回答;(2) 了解回答的差异与心理健康的关系。方法。数据来自美国国家青少年到成人健康纵向研究(Add Health)的性取向/性别认同、社会经济地位和生命全过程健康(SOGI-SES)研究(2020-2021 年)。我们使用调整后的 Wald 检验来比较以下受访者的比例:(1) 使用为 "添加健康 "研究和 "全国健康访谈调查"(NHIS)设计的性取向问题被归类为异性恋或异性恋者和性少数群体的受访者;(2) 被诊断患有抑郁症、焦虑症或恐慌症的受访者。结果。Add Health 问题发现的性少数群体受访者人数是 NHIS 问题的两倍多。那些对 Add Health 问题回答为性少数群体,但对 NHIS 问题回答为异性恋或异性恋者(主要是 "大部分为异性恋者")的人,其心理健康结果更类似于那些一直被归类为性少数群体的人,而不是那些一直被归类为异性恋或异性恋者的人。结论目前国家级调查中对性取向的测量可能低估了性少数人群以及与性取向相关的健康差异。对公共卫生的影响。研究结果表明,有必要进一步开展研究,以扩大基于人口的健康调查中对性取向的测量。(Am J Public Health.2024;114(12):1375-1383. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307839).
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of public health
American journal of public health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1109
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Public Health (AJPH) is dedicated to publishing original work in research, research methods, and program evaluation within the field of public health. The journal's mission is to advance public health research, policy, practice, and education.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Health Disparities and Sexual Orientation Response Choices Used in Two US National Population-Based Health Surveys, 2020‒2021. Bridging the Gap: Aligning Education for Public Health With Emerging Workforce Demands. Mastheads. Subscription Form. Table of Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1