Effects of carbonization on gunshot residue detection in an animal model

IF 0.8 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Forensic Imaging Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1016/j.fri.2024.200612
Charbel El Khoury Moussa , Bruno Payré , Sébastien Aries , Stéphane Grill , Sarah Galland , Lise Pestourie , Fabrice Dedouit , Norbert Telmon , Fréderic Savall , Céline Guilbeau-Frugier
{"title":"Effects of carbonization on gunshot residue detection in an animal model","authors":"Charbel El Khoury Moussa ,&nbsp;Bruno Payré ,&nbsp;Sébastien Aries ,&nbsp;Stéphane Grill ,&nbsp;Sarah Galland ,&nbsp;Lise Pestourie ,&nbsp;Fabrice Dedouit ,&nbsp;Norbert Telmon ,&nbsp;Fréderic Savall ,&nbsp;Céline Guilbeau-Frugier","doi":"10.1016/j.fri.2024.200612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The detection of gunshot residue (GSR) can be useful to determine if the wound has been caused by a firearm and it could help to differentiate the entry wound from the exit one. Carbonization is a good method for altering crime scenes. However, there are few studies in this specific context. The first objective of our study was to examine the persistence of GSR in wounds after carbonization. The second aim was to differentiate entry wounds from exit ones.</div><div>For the experiment, bullets were fired with a 22LR on sheep limbs at contact range.</div><div>The specimens were divided into four groups: two that weren't shot at (fresh and carbonized limbs) and two of shot limbs (one with carbonization and one without). Carbonization was performed in the open air using an accelerant.</div><div>Wounds were analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM–EDX) and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS).</div><div>Lead, Antimony and Barium were observed using SEM-EDX only in the entry wounds, while lead was found in the exit ones. ICP-MS enabled the detection of these elements in the entry and exit wounds but predominantly in the entry ones. After carbonization we observed a huge decrease of GSR. With SEM-EDX most of the particles detected were only consistent with GSR. Anyway, the identification of GSR and the differentiation between entry and exit wounds were still possible with both techniques. Therefore, they are suitable for detecting GSR in carbonized gunshot wounds under the specific conditions of our experiment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":40763,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Imaging","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 200612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666225624000356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The detection of gunshot residue (GSR) can be useful to determine if the wound has been caused by a firearm and it could help to differentiate the entry wound from the exit one. Carbonization is a good method for altering crime scenes. However, there are few studies in this specific context. The first objective of our study was to examine the persistence of GSR in wounds after carbonization. The second aim was to differentiate entry wounds from exit ones.
For the experiment, bullets were fired with a 22LR on sheep limbs at contact range.
The specimens were divided into four groups: two that weren't shot at (fresh and carbonized limbs) and two of shot limbs (one with carbonization and one without). Carbonization was performed in the open air using an accelerant.
Wounds were analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM–EDX) and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS).
Lead, Antimony and Barium were observed using SEM-EDX only in the entry wounds, while lead was found in the exit ones. ICP-MS enabled the detection of these elements in the entry and exit wounds but predominantly in the entry ones. After carbonization we observed a huge decrease of GSR. With SEM-EDX most of the particles detected were only consistent with GSR. Anyway, the identification of GSR and the differentiation between entry and exit wounds were still possible with both techniques. Therefore, they are suitable for detecting GSR in carbonized gunshot wounds under the specific conditions of our experiment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳化对动物模型枪弹残留物检测的影响
检测枪击残留物(GSR)有助于确定伤口是否由枪支造成,也有助于区分入口伤口和出口伤口。碳化是改变犯罪现场的一种好方法。然而,针对这一特定情况的研究却很少。我们研究的第一个目的是检查碳化后伤口中 GSR 的持久性。在实验中,用 22LR 子弹在接触范围内射击绵羊肢体。标本被分为四组:两组未中弹(新鲜肢体和碳化肢体),两组中弹肢体(一组碳化,一组未碳化)。使用扫描电子显微镜与能量色散 X 射线光谱法(SEM-EDX)和电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)对伤口进行了分析。使用扫描电子显微镜与能量色散 X 射线光谱法(SEM-EDX)仅在入口伤口中观察到铅、锑和钡,而在出口伤口中发现了铅。ICP-MS 能够在入口和出口伤口中检测到这些元素,但主要是在入口伤口中。碳化后,我们观察到 GSR 大幅下降。通过 SEM-EDX 检测到的大部分颗粒与 GSR 一致。无论如何,这两种技术仍然可以识别 GSR 并区分入口和出口伤口。因此,在我们实验的特定条件下,这两种技术都适用于检测碳化枪伤中的 GSR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Imaging
Forensic Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
27.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Closed iris, long exposure photography improves three-dimensional photogrammetric bone reconstructions Cranial surgical approaches in the 21st Century Identified Skeletal Collection Unveiling the diagnostic accuracy of PMCT: Detection of pneumonia considering postmortem changes and time intervals Exploring lightweight convolution neural networks for segmenting striation marks from firearm bullet images Age estimation based on sternebral fusion in a sample of Egyptian population using three-dimensional computed tomography scanning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1