Japanese version of the Equity Sensitivity Inventory Adapted for Married Couples

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Family Relations Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1111/fare.13082
Yuki Kanazawa, Taiga Shibayama
{"title":"Japanese version of the Equity Sensitivity Inventory Adapted for Married Couples","authors":"Yuki Kanazawa,&nbsp;Taiga Shibayama","doi":"10.1111/fare.13082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to modify the Japanese version of the Justice Sensitivity Inventory for married couples raising children to help them become more aware of their partner's sensitivity to fairness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In Japan, couples with children tend to have prejudice about the division of roles, perceiving each other based on the fairness of child care, housework, and work.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Our participants comprised married couples who lived together with a child aged between 1 month and 3 years. A Web company commissioned a survey, with 1,200 and 500 participants included in the first and second rounds of testing, respectively, conducted 1 week apart. We examined the correlation between each subscale of the Japanese version of the Equity Sensitivity Inventory Adapted for Married Couples (J-ESIA), the Japanese version of the Quality Marriage Index (J-QMI), the Japanese version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (J-IRI), and the short form of the Japanese Big-Five Scale (S-JBFS). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three factors were identified: ES-Perpetrator, ES-Victim, and ES-Beneficiary. Cronbach's α for each subscale ranged from .95 to .96.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A couple-specific correlation was confirmed for comorbid validity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Couples can recognize each other's sensitivity to fairness and bring about behavioral change in their relationship.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":"73 5","pages":"3232-3249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fare.13082","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.13082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to modify the Japanese version of the Justice Sensitivity Inventory for married couples raising children to help them become more aware of their partner's sensitivity to fairness.

Background

In Japan, couples with children tend to have prejudice about the division of roles, perceiving each other based on the fairness of child care, housework, and work.

Method

Our participants comprised married couples who lived together with a child aged between 1 month and 3 years. A Web company commissioned a survey, with 1,200 and 500 participants included in the first and second rounds of testing, respectively, conducted 1 week apart. We examined the correlation between each subscale of the Japanese version of the Equity Sensitivity Inventory Adapted for Married Couples (J-ESIA), the Japanese version of the Quality Marriage Index (J-QMI), the Japanese version of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (J-IRI), and the short form of the Japanese Big-Five Scale (S-JBFS). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted.

Results

Three factors were identified: ES-Perpetrator, ES-Victim, and ES-Beneficiary. Cronbach's α for each subscale ranged from .95 to .96.

Conclusion

A couple-specific correlation was confirmed for comorbid validity.

Implications

Couples can recognize each other's sensitivity to fairness and bring about behavioral change in their relationship.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适用于已婚夫妇的日文版公平敏感性量表
目的 本研究旨在为已婚育儿夫妇修改日语版的公正敏感度量表,以帮助他们更好地了解伴侣对公正的敏感度。 背景 在日本,有孩子的夫妇往往对角色分工存在偏见,他们会根据照顾孩子、家务劳动和工作的公平性来看待对方。 方法 我们的参与者包括共同生活、孩子年龄在 1 个月到 3 岁之间的已婚夫妇。一家网络公司委托我们进行了一项调查,第一轮和第二轮测试分别有 1200 名和 500 名参与者参加,测试时间相隔一周。我们研究了日语版已婚夫妇公平敏感性量表(J-ESIA)、日语版优质婚姻指数(J-QMI)、日语版人际反应指数(J-IRI)和日语大五量表简表(S-JBFS)各分量表之间的相关性。进行了探索性和确认性因素分析。 结果 确定了三个因子:ES-施暴者、ES-受害者和 ES-受益者。每个子量表的 Cronbach's α 在 0.95 至 0.96 之间。 结论 夫妇特异性相关性已被证实具有合并有效性。 意义 夫妇可以认识到对方对公平的敏感性,并在他们的关系中带来行为上的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Parental childhood adversity and emotional functioning: Associations with child's emotion regulation Socialization of adolescent emotion regulation through interparental conflict: Adolescent versus parent report Family communication patterns and networking behavior: A moderated mediation model A preventive intervention promoting toddlers' self-regulation improves parental resilience in the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1