Rethinking Natural Gas Infrastructure: How Non-Pipe Alternatives are Shaping Utility Planning

Endam Nkeih, Katerina Deliargyris, Andrew Biondi
{"title":"Rethinking Natural Gas Infrastructure: How Non-Pipe Alternatives are Shaping Utility Planning","authors":"Endam Nkeih,&nbsp;Katerina Deliargyris,&nbsp;Andrew Biondi","doi":"10.1002/gas.22435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction efforts accelerate, utility regulators nationwide are rethinking the role of natural gas in reducing GHG emissions over current levels. A key strategy emerging in several states is the mandatory consideration of non-pipe alternatives (NPAs); solutions that avoid the need for new natural gas hook-ups. California, Massachusetts, New York, and Colorado are leading the effort, and other states like Maryland, Hawaii, Oregon, Minnesota, and New Jersey are not far behind. Before gaining approval for traditional new pipeline investments as opposed to pipeline replacement, regulators are requiring utilities to thoroughly analyze the costs and benefits of NPAs. This is compelling natural gas utilities to rethink their business models and find the most effective ways to present NPAs to regulators and customers. With this enhanced scrutiny and regulatory mandates that are increasingly focusing on sustainability, natural gas distribution utilities are at a crossroads. The challenge lies in adapting to these expectations and innovating scalable investments that will meet regulatory demands while driving the transition to a cleaner energy future.</p>","PeriodicalId":100259,"journal":{"name":"Climate and Energy","volume":"41 5","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gas.22435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction efforts accelerate, utility regulators nationwide are rethinking the role of natural gas in reducing GHG emissions over current levels. A key strategy emerging in several states is the mandatory consideration of non-pipe alternatives (NPAs); solutions that avoid the need for new natural gas hook-ups. California, Massachusetts, New York, and Colorado are leading the effort, and other states like Maryland, Hawaii, Oregon, Minnesota, and New Jersey are not far behind. Before gaining approval for traditional new pipeline investments as opposed to pipeline replacement, regulators are requiring utilities to thoroughly analyze the costs and benefits of NPAs. This is compelling natural gas utilities to rethink their business models and find the most effective ways to present NPAs to regulators and customers. With this enhanced scrutiny and regulatory mandates that are increasingly focusing on sustainability, natural gas distribution utilities are at a crossroads. The challenge lies in adapting to these expectations and innovating scalable investments that will meet regulatory demands while driving the transition to a cleaner energy future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反思天然气基础设施:非管道替代方案如何影响公用事业规划
随着温室气体(GHG)减排工作的加快,全国的公用事业监管机构正在重新思考天然气在温室气体减排中的作用。在一些州出现的一项关键战略是强制考虑非管道替代方案(NPA),即无需新安装天然气的解决方案。加利福尼亚州、马萨诸塞州、纽约州和科罗拉多州在这方面处于领先地位,其他州如马里兰州、夏威夷州、俄勒冈州、明尼苏达州和新泽西州也不甘落后。在传统的新管道投资(而非管道更换)获得批准之前,监管机构要求公用事业公司彻底分析 NPA 的成本和效益。这迫使天然气公司重新思考其业务模式,并找到最有效的方法向监管机构和客户介绍 NPA。随着审查的加强以及监管机构对可持续发展的日益重视,天然气配送公司正处于十字路口。面临的挑战在于如何适应这些期望,并创新可扩展的投资,以满足监管要求,同时推动向更清洁能源未来的过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community-Centered Grid Infrastructure Development The Value of International Engagement in Energy Education Assuring Energy Infrastructure Reliability and Resiliency Advanced Metering Infrastructure: Continued Evolution and Opportunities to Deliver Greater Value Can Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage Survive the Voluntary Financing Structure?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1