The international community is failing to protect healthcare in armed conflict

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1136/bmj.q2474
Richard Brennan, Muhammad Sheraz
{"title":"The international community is failing to protect healthcare in armed conflict","authors":"Richard Brennan, Muhammad Sheraz","doi":"10.1136/bmj.q2474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regular attacks on health facilities, workers, and patients in conflicts are a devastating reality Since 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) has documented over 7400 attacks on healthcare in armed conflict across 21 countries and territories.1 WHO defines an attack on healthcare as any act of verbal, physical violence, obstruction, or threat of violence that interferes with the availability, access, and delivery of curative or preventive health services during emergencies. That translates to an average of three attacks a day, every day. The attacks have killed almost 2500 health workers, patients, and bystanders—one a day. To prevent and mitigate attacks on healthcare— one of the most disturbing aspects of today’s conflicts—we need renewed political, legal, diplomatic, and programmatic efforts. Attacks on healthcare are a global problem. While reporting is not exhaustive, most attacks over the past seven years have occurred in the occupied Palestinian territory, Ukraine, Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar, Afghanistan, and Syria.1 Despite clear prohibitions under international law, not one person has been held accountable for any of the over 7400 attacks documented by WHO. Historically, only a handful of cases have led to charges and prosecution. The message is clear—current laws, accountability mechanisms, and diplomatic efforts are proving ineffective at protecting healthcare in conflict.2 Impunity is the rule. And the public health implications are stark—attacks on healthcare severely disrupt access to life …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q2474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regular attacks on health facilities, workers, and patients in conflicts are a devastating reality Since 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) has documented over 7400 attacks on healthcare in armed conflict across 21 countries and territories.1 WHO defines an attack on healthcare as any act of verbal, physical violence, obstruction, or threat of violence that interferes with the availability, access, and delivery of curative or preventive health services during emergencies. That translates to an average of three attacks a day, every day. The attacks have killed almost 2500 health workers, patients, and bystanders—one a day. To prevent and mitigate attacks on healthcare— one of the most disturbing aspects of today’s conflicts—we need renewed political, legal, diplomatic, and programmatic efforts. Attacks on healthcare are a global problem. While reporting is not exhaustive, most attacks over the past seven years have occurred in the occupied Palestinian territory, Ukraine, Democratic Republic of Congo, Myanmar, Afghanistan, and Syria.1 Despite clear prohibitions under international law, not one person has been held accountable for any of the over 7400 attacks documented by WHO. Historically, only a handful of cases have led to charges and prosecution. The message is clear—current laws, accountability mechanisms, and diplomatic efforts are proving ineffective at protecting healthcare in conflict.2 Impunity is the rule. And the public health implications are stark—attacks on healthcare severely disrupt access to life …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际社会未能保护武装冲突中的医疗卫生服务
自 2018 年以来,世界卫生组织(WHO)已记录了 21 个国家和地区的 7400 多起武装冲突中的医疗卫生袭击事件。1 WHO 将医疗卫生袭击定义为在紧急情况下干扰治疗性或预防性医疗卫生服务的提供、获取和交付的任何口头、身体暴力、阻挠或暴力威胁行为。这意味着每天平均发生三起袭击事件。这些袭击已造成近 2500 名医务工作者、患者和旁观者死亡,每天一人死亡。为了预防和减少对医疗卫生服务的袭击--这是当今冲突中最令人不安的方面之一--我们需要在政治、法律、外交和计划方面做出新的努力。对医疗卫生的袭击是一个全球性问题。1 尽管国际法明令禁止,但在世卫组织记录的7400多起袭击事件中,没有一人被追究责任。从历史上看,只有少数案件导致了指控和起诉。信息是明确的--现行法律、问责机制和外交努力在保护冲突中的医疗保健方面证明是无效的。对公共卫生的影响是显而易见的--对医疗保健的攻击严重破坏了人们对生命的获取......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Partha Kar: Leng’s review of physician and anaesthesia associates is welcome—with guarded optimism Unified response is needed to tackle tuberculosis among refugees and migrants Take the lead: additional medical leadership development opportunities and resources Maurice King: physician who proposed a one child policy to combat overpopulation Helen Salisbury: If GPs aren’t formally part of the NHS, what are we?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1