Combined Cuff Repair And superior Capsular Reconstruction reinforcement (CRACR) in patients with massive rotator cuff (re)tears. A Minimum 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.048
Kenneth Cutbush, Freek Hollman, Mohamad Jomaa, Nagmani Singh, Brandon Ziegenfuss, Praveen Vijaysegaran, Kristine Italia, Sarah L Whitehouse, Ridzwan Mohamed Namazie, Ashish Gupta
{"title":"Combined Cuff Repair And superior Capsular Reconstruction reinforcement (CRACR) in patients with massive rotator cuff (re)tears. A Minimum 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up.","authors":"Kenneth Cutbush, Freek Hollman, Mohamad Jomaa, Nagmani Singh, Brandon Ziegenfuss, Praveen Vijaysegaran, Kristine Italia, Sarah L Whitehouse, Ridzwan Mohamed Namazie, Ashish Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to the aging population, the number of symptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears has increased substantially and some are challenging to repair due to poor tendon quality with significant retraction. In order to optimize repair integrity and function, rotator cuff repair reinforcement with a superior capsule reconstruction has been proposed. This study presents the results of a technique combining cuff repair and capsular reconstruction (CRACR) using acellular dermal allograft in patients with massive rotator cuff tears and retears.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2017 to July 2019 50 consecutive patients with previous failed rotator cuff repairs or primary surgery on poor tendon quality defined as massive rotator cuff tear (full thickness rotator cuff tears with 2 or more tendons involved), were treated with the CRACR technique and enrolled prospectively. Contraindications for the CRACR procedure were Hamada stage ≥ 3 cuff tear arthropathy and patient's preference for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Patients were reviewed at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, Constant Murley Scores (CMS), Visual Analogues Scores (VAS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), QuickDASH (QD)). Postoperative MRI scans were requested at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively to assess repair integrity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age at surgery was 58.0 years (SD 8.1, range 41-79). Of the 50 patients, 14 patients (28.0%) had previous failed rotator cuff repair. From the 36 primary cases, 28 (77.8%) had massive rotator cuff tears and one (2.8%) a perioperative irreparable tear, while 28 (77.8%) patients had a subscapularis tear. At 2 years of follow-up all scores improved significantly (VAS 6.3 to 1.5; ASES 34.0 to 79.0; CMS 30.9 to 68.0; OSS 23.3 to 40.1; QD 56.2 to 20.3; all p<0.001). MRI scans were conducted at a mean of 14.4 months (SD 7.0, range 3-26) after surgery showing 6 isolated SCR failures and 5 isolated rotator cuff retears.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the short term the rotator cuff repair and superior capsular reconstruction reinforcement (CRACR) technique is a valid option for patients with massive rotator cuff tears and retears with a high chance of a postoperative retear due to poor tendon quality. Clinical results and repair integrity is promising. Longer term follow-up is ongoing to establish the efficacy of this procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Due to the aging population, the number of symptomatic degenerative rotator cuff tears has increased substantially and some are challenging to repair due to poor tendon quality with significant retraction. In order to optimize repair integrity and function, rotator cuff repair reinforcement with a superior capsule reconstruction has been proposed. This study presents the results of a technique combining cuff repair and capsular reconstruction (CRACR) using acellular dermal allograft in patients with massive rotator cuff tears and retears.

Methods: From December 2017 to July 2019 50 consecutive patients with previous failed rotator cuff repairs or primary surgery on poor tendon quality defined as massive rotator cuff tear (full thickness rotator cuff tears with 2 or more tendons involved), were treated with the CRACR technique and enrolled prospectively. Contraindications for the CRACR procedure were Hamada stage ≥ 3 cuff tear arthropathy and patient's preference for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Patients were reviewed at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, Constant Murley Scores (CMS), Visual Analogues Scores (VAS), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), QuickDASH (QD)). Postoperative MRI scans were requested at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively to assess repair integrity.

Results: Mean age at surgery was 58.0 years (SD 8.1, range 41-79). Of the 50 patients, 14 patients (28.0%) had previous failed rotator cuff repair. From the 36 primary cases, 28 (77.8%) had massive rotator cuff tears and one (2.8%) a perioperative irreparable tear, while 28 (77.8%) patients had a subscapularis tear. At 2 years of follow-up all scores improved significantly (VAS 6.3 to 1.5; ASES 34.0 to 79.0; CMS 30.9 to 68.0; OSS 23.3 to 40.1; QD 56.2 to 20.3; all p<0.001). MRI scans were conducted at a mean of 14.4 months (SD 7.0, range 3-26) after surgery showing 6 isolated SCR failures and 5 isolated rotator cuff retears.

Conclusion: In the short term the rotator cuff repair and superior capsular reconstruction reinforcement (CRACR) technique is a valid option for patients with massive rotator cuff tears and retears with a high chance of a postoperative retear due to poor tendon quality. Clinical results and repair integrity is promising. Longer term follow-up is ongoing to establish the efficacy of this procedure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大面积肩袖(再)撕裂患者的联合肩袖修复和上囊重建加固术(CRACR)。至少两年的临床和放射学随访。
背景:由于人口老龄化,有症状的退行性肩袖撕裂数量大幅增加,其中一些撕裂由于肌腱质量差和明显回缩而难以修复。为了优化修复的完整性和功能,有人提出了用上端囊重建加固肩袖修复的方法。本研究介绍了在大面积肩袖撕裂和再撕裂患者中使用无细胞真皮同种异体移植的肩袖修复和囊重建(CRACR)相结合技术的结果:从 2017 年 12 月到 2019 年 7 月,50 名曾接受过失败肩袖修复或肌腱质量差的初治手术的连续患者接受了 CRACR 技术治疗,这些患者被定义为大面积肩袖撕裂(累及 2 条或更多肌腱的全厚度肩袖撕裂),并进行了前瞻性登记。CRACR手术的禁忌症为Hamada分期≥3的肩袖撕裂关节病,以及患者对反向全肩关节置换术的偏好。患者在 3、6、12 和 24 个月时接受复查(美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评分、Constant Murley 评分(CMS)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、牛津肩关节评分(OSS)、QuickDASH(QD))。术后6周、3个月、6个月、12个月和24个月分别进行核磁共振扫描,以评估修复的完整性:手术时的平均年龄为 58.0 岁(SD 8.1,范围 41-79)。在50名患者中,14名患者(28.0%)曾有过肩袖修复失败的经历。在36例初诊病例中,28例(77.8%)肩袖大面积撕裂,1例(2.8%)围手术期撕裂无法修复,28例(77.8%)肩胛下肌撕裂。随访两年后,所有评分均有明显改善(VAS 6.3 分至 1.5 分;ASES 34.0 分至 79.0 分;CMS 30.9 分至 68.0 分;OSS 23.3 分至 40.1 分;QD 56.2 分至 20.3 分;所有 p 均为 0):在短期内,肩袖修复和上关节囊重建加固(CRACR)技术是大面积肩袖撕裂和再撕裂患者的有效选择,由于肌腱质量差,术后再撕裂的几率很高。临床效果和修复完整性令人满意。目前正在进行长期随访,以确定该手术的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
After primary shoulder arthroplasty appropriate vancomycin antibiotic prophylaxis does not lead to increased infectious complications when compared to cefazolin. Lateralization of the humerus in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: can preoperative planning software predict postoperative lateralization and does lateralization influence outcomes? Pathological formation of subcoracoid bursa effusion on magnetic resonance imaging studies. Pain Relief Survivorship: A Comparison of Exactech Equinoxe Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis. Tyrolean Iceman's arrow injury to the shoulder: New insights into extent and survival time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1