Efficacy of dexmedetomidine epidural anesthesia combined with nano-silver polyurethane dressing in gynecological surgery and its influence on hemodynamics, inflammatory response and postoperative recovery.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-10-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/PKPP5795
Yong Fang, Fuhe Zhou, Yongjian Chai
{"title":"Efficacy of dexmedetomidine epidural anesthesia combined with nano-silver polyurethane dressing in gynecological surgery and its influence on hemodynamics, inflammatory response and postoperative recovery.","authors":"Yong Fang, Fuhe Zhou, Yongjian Chai","doi":"10.62347/PKPP5795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine epidural anesthesia combined with nano-silver polyurethane dressing in gynecological surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed data of 80 patients who underwent epidural anesthesia at Jinan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from January 2018 to May 2022. The patients treated with propofol and routine postoperative wound treatment were assigned into a control group, while the patients treated with dexmedetomidine and nano-silver polyurethane dressing were classified into an observation group. The baseline data, anesthesia effect, intraoperative basic indexes, hemodynamics indexes, postoperative recovery indexes, recovery quality, inflammatory response and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observation group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of excellent and good outcomes (97.5%) compared to the control group (85.0%) (P < 0.05). The anesthesia recovery time of the observation group was notably longer than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The Ramsay score and levels of mean arterial pressure in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, while the heart rate level was significantly lower than that in the control group (all P < 0.05). The wound healing time, dressing change times and visual analogue scale (VAS) score in the observation group were obviously lower than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the 40-items quality of recovery score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (both P < 0.05). The serum IL-6, CRP and TNF-α levels in the observation group were lower than that in the control group (all P < 0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group (7.5%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (25.0%) (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In gynecological surgeries utilizing epidural anesthesia, dexmedetomidine minimally impacts hemodynamics and provides good anesthesia and sedation with a low incidence of adverse drug reactions. Nano-silver polyurethane dressing accelerates wound healing, reduces the dressing changes, alleviates the inflammatory response, and reduces the occurrence of wound infection, thereby enhancing postoperative recovery quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/PKPP5795","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine epidural anesthesia combined with nano-silver polyurethane dressing in gynecological surgery.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data of 80 patients who underwent epidural anesthesia at Jinan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital from January 2018 to May 2022. The patients treated with propofol and routine postoperative wound treatment were assigned into a control group, while the patients treated with dexmedetomidine and nano-silver polyurethane dressing were classified into an observation group. The baseline data, anesthesia effect, intraoperative basic indexes, hemodynamics indexes, postoperative recovery indexes, recovery quality, inflammatory response and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results: The observation group demonstrated a significantly higher rate of excellent and good outcomes (97.5%) compared to the control group (85.0%) (P < 0.05). The anesthesia recovery time of the observation group was notably longer than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The Ramsay score and levels of mean arterial pressure in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, while the heart rate level was significantly lower than that in the control group (all P < 0.05). The wound healing time, dressing change times and visual analogue scale (VAS) score in the observation group were obviously lower than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). The Pittsburgh sleep quality index score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the 40-items quality of recovery score in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (both P < 0.05). The serum IL-6, CRP and TNF-α levels in the observation group were lower than that in the control group (all P < 0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group (7.5%) was significantly lower than that in the control group (25.0%) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: In gynecological surgeries utilizing epidural anesthesia, dexmedetomidine minimally impacts hemodynamics and provides good anesthesia and sedation with a low incidence of adverse drug reactions. Nano-silver polyurethane dressing accelerates wound healing, reduces the dressing changes, alleviates the inflammatory response, and reduces the occurrence of wound infection, thereby enhancing postoperative recovery quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右美托咪定硬膜外麻醉联合纳米银聚氨酯敷料在妇科手术中的疗效及其对血液动力学、炎症反应和术后恢复的影响。
目的评价右美托咪定硬膜外麻醉联合纳米银聚氨酯敷料在妇科手术中的应用效果:该回顾性研究分析了2018年1月至2022年5月在济南市妇幼保健院接受硬膜外麻醉的80例患者数据。将使用异丙酚和术后常规伤口处理的患者分为对照组,将使用右美托咪定和纳米银聚氨酯敷料的患者分为观察组。比较两组患者的基线数据、麻醉效果、术中基本指标、血液动力学指标、术后恢复指标、恢复质量、炎症反应和不良反应:观察组的优和良率(97.5%)明显高于对照组(85.0%)(P < 0.05)。观察组的麻醉恢复时间明显长于对照组(P < 0.05)。观察组的 Ramsay 评分和平均动脉压水平均高于对照组,而心率水平则明显低于对照组(均 P < 0.05)。观察组的伤口愈合时间、换药次数和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分明显低于对照组(均 P < 0.05)。观察组的匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评分低于对照组,观察组的 40 项恢复质量评分高于对照组(均 P < 0.05)。观察组的血清IL-6、CRP和TNF-α水平均低于对照组(均P<0.05)。观察组不良反应总发生率(7.5%)明显低于对照组(25.0%)(P < 0.05):结论:在使用硬膜外麻醉的妇科手术中,右美托咪定对血流动力学的影响最小,并能提供良好的麻醉和镇静效果,且药物不良反应发生率较低。纳米银聚氨酯敷料可加速伤口愈合,减少换药次数,减轻炎症反应,减少伤口感染的发生,从而提高术后恢复质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
The antimicrobial effect of Curcuma longa and Allium sativum decoction in rats explains its utility in wound care. Assessment of body composition-related imaging parameters indicative of sarcopenia in Chinese patients with Crohn's disease: correlation with disease severity and biologic efficacy. Role of coagulation indices in assessinghypertensive disorders in pregnancy and predicting delivery outcomes. Assessment of frailty status in patients with acute cerebral infarction and their relationship with serum markers. Serum bisphenol S levels are associated with decreased ovarian reserve function: a single-center study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1