Measuring Outcomes Relevant to the Décolletage From the Patient Perspective: Development and Validation of the BODY-Q Décolletage Scale.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Aesthetic Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1093/asj/sjae229
Anne F Klassen, Charlene Rae, Andrea L Pusic, Manraj Kaur
{"title":"Measuring Outcomes Relevant to the Décolletage From the Patient Perspective: Development and Validation of the BODY-Q Décolletage Scale.","authors":"Anne F Klassen, Charlene Rae, Andrea L Pusic, Manraj Kaur","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A range of cosmetic treatments to improve skin quality of the décolletage are available. To measure outcomes from the patient perspective, a rigorously developed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) is needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and validate the BODY-Q Décolletage scale.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Appearance-related codes from BODY-Q concept elicitation interviews were re-examined and 13 items drafted and refined through qualitative interviews with patients and clinicians. The scale was tested in an online international sample of women aged ≥25 years who had previously received a treatment for the décolletage, or in the past 12 months had received a cosmetic treatment at a plastic surgery or dermatology clinic. Data were analysed with both Rasch measurement theory and classical test theory. Construct validity involved testing 20 hypotheses. Convergent validity tests included correlations between the décolletage scale and other BODY-Q scales and the SKIN-Q.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews conducted with 15 patients and 5 clinicians led to a 16-item scale with items that covered scenarios (mirror, photographs, low neckline, lay on side, breasts together, arms crossed, get up, up close), comparisons (with other people), age concerns (youthful, age), qualitative concerns (attractive, healthy), skin tone (even-colored), and texture (smooth, texture). The field test included 334 participants. An item with poor fit to the Rasch model was dropped. Data for the remaining 15 items fit the Rasch model (χ2 = 76.72, df = 60, P = .07). All items had ordered thresholds and good item fit. All reliability statistics were >0.93. A total of 19 of 20 predefined hypotheses (95%) were met, providing evidence of construct validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BODY-Q Décolletage scale is available to incorporate the perspective of patients into clinical care and clinical trials of minimally invasive treatments to improve skin quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"313-320"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A range of cosmetic treatments to improve skin quality of the décolletage are available. To measure outcomes from the patient perspective, a rigorously developed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) is needed.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and validate the BODY-Q Décolletage scale.

Methods: Appearance-related codes from BODY-Q concept elicitation interviews were re-examined and 13 items drafted and refined through qualitative interviews with patients and clinicians. The scale was tested in an online international sample of women aged ≥25 years who had previously received a treatment for the décolletage, or in the past 12 months had received a cosmetic treatment at a plastic surgery or dermatology clinic. Data were analysed with both Rasch measurement theory and classical test theory. Construct validity involved testing 20 hypotheses. Convergent validity tests included correlations between the décolletage scale and other BODY-Q scales and the SKIN-Q.

Results: Interviews conducted with 15 patients and 5 clinicians led to a 16-item scale with items that covered scenarios (mirror, photographs, low neckline, lay on side, breasts together, arms crossed, get up, up close), comparisons (with other people), age concerns (youthful, age), qualitative concerns (attractive, healthy), skin tone (even-colored), and texture (smooth, texture). The field test included 334 participants. An item with poor fit to the Rasch model was dropped. Data for the remaining 15 items fit the Rasch model (χ2 = 76.72, df = 60, P = .07). All items had ordered thresholds and good item fit. All reliability statistics were >0.93. A total of 19 of 20 predefined hypotheses (95%) were met, providing evidence of construct validity.

Conclusions: The BODY-Q Décolletage scale is available to incorporate the perspective of patients into clinical care and clinical trials of minimally invasive treatments to improve skin quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从患者角度衡量与胸部下垂有关的结果:BODY-Q 十褶量表的开发与验证。
背景:目前有一系列改善肩部皮肤质量的美容疗法。为了从患者的角度衡量治疗效果,需要一个严格制定的患者报告结果衡量标准:开发并验证 BODY-Q 十肩部量表:方法:重新审查 BODY-Q 概念激发访谈中与外貌相关的代码,并通过患者和临床医生汇报访谈起草和完善了 13 个项目。该量表在一个在线国际样本中进行了测试,样本年龄大于 25 岁,曾接受过法令纹治疗,或在过去 12 个月中在整形外科或皮肤科诊所接受过美容治疗。采用拉施测量理论和经典测试理论对数据进行了分析:通过对 15 名患者和 5 名临床医生进行访谈,得出了一个包含 16 个项目的量表,其中包括场景(镜子、照片、低领口、侧卧、双乳并拢、双臂交叉、起身、近距离)、比较(其他人)、年龄(年轻、年龄)、质量(有吸引力、健康)、颜色(均匀色)和质地(光滑、质地)。有 334 人参加了实地测试。一个与 Rasch 模型拟合度较低的项目被删除。其余 15 个项目的数据均符合 Rasch 模型(Chi-square=76.72,df=60,p=0.07)。所有项目都具有有序阈值和良好的项目拟合度。所有信度统计均大于 0.93。在 20 个预先设定的假设中,共有 19 个(95%)得到了满足,这提供了构建效度的证据:法令纹量表可用于将患者的观点纳入微创治疗的临床护理和临床试验中,以改善皮肤质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
期刊最新文献
Arterioembolic Characteristics of Differentially Diluted CaHA-CMC Gels Within an Artificial Macrovascular Perfusion Model. The Occurrence of Health Symptoms in General Practice Before and After the Explantation of Cosmetic Breast Implants. Correction to: Breast Pocket Lavage With Clindamycin Solution for Silicone Removal After Implant Rupture. Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) in 252 Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons: Prevalences, ACE Clustering, and Effects on Adult Health and Behaviors, Including Self-Defined Depression, Work Addiction, and Burnout. IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Upper Facial Lines: Results From Two Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1