{"title":"Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization (MFU-V) Effectiveness and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mojgan Amiri, Guardmond Ajasllari, Adea Llane, Gabriela Casabona, Tatjana Pavicic, Julia Sevi, Julieta Spada, Vasanop Vachiramon, Rossana Vasconcelos, Siew Tuck Wah, Taulant Muka, Sabrina Guillen Fabi","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is an advanced, non-invasive cosmetic procedure widely used in skin lifting and tightening. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the aesthetic effectiveness, patients' satisfaction, skin quality, and safety profile of MFU-V treatment. A comprehensive search of 5 bibliographic databases up to 2023 was conducted. Pooled effect estimates using random effects models and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Out of 4,019 references, 42 studies were included. Meta-analysis showed 89% of patients (95% CI: 81- 94%; I2: 63%, n=411) demonstrated some degree of global aesthetic improvement, as assessed by investigators. Similarly, 84% of patients (95% CI: 73- 91%; I2: 64%, n=312) reported improvement following treatment. Satisfaction of any level was reported by 84% of patients (95% CI: 61- 94%; I²: 52%, n=326), and 62% (95% CI: 37- 82%; I²: 3%, n=172) when 'neutral' as a response was provided for the patients. Skin quality (e.g., wrinkles, texture) also improved. Patients reported a pooled mean pain score of 4.85 (95% CI: 4.35, 5.35; I2: 97%, n=785), indicating moderate pain. Common adverse events included erythema, edema, swelling, bruising, and tenderness, all of which were generally mild to moderate in severity. Overall, our analysis demonstrated a notable increase in global aesthetic improvement and patients' satisfaction following MFU-V treatment, accompanied by moderate pain and a generally favorable safety profile. However, the potential misclassification of neutral responses as positive could result in an overestimation of the treatment's efficacy. These findings highlight the need for well-designed trials to further explore MFU-V's clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae228","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is an advanced, non-invasive cosmetic procedure widely used in skin lifting and tightening. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the aesthetic effectiveness, patients' satisfaction, skin quality, and safety profile of MFU-V treatment. A comprehensive search of 5 bibliographic databases up to 2023 was conducted. Pooled effect estimates using random effects models and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Out of 4,019 references, 42 studies were included. Meta-analysis showed 89% of patients (95% CI: 81- 94%; I2: 63%, n=411) demonstrated some degree of global aesthetic improvement, as assessed by investigators. Similarly, 84% of patients (95% CI: 73- 91%; I2: 64%, n=312) reported improvement following treatment. Satisfaction of any level was reported by 84% of patients (95% CI: 61- 94%; I²: 52%, n=326), and 62% (95% CI: 37- 82%; I²: 3%, n=172) when 'neutral' as a response was provided for the patients. Skin quality (e.g., wrinkles, texture) also improved. Patients reported a pooled mean pain score of 4.85 (95% CI: 4.35, 5.35; I2: 97%, n=785), indicating moderate pain. Common adverse events included erythema, edema, swelling, bruising, and tenderness, all of which were generally mild to moderate in severity. Overall, our analysis demonstrated a notable increase in global aesthetic improvement and patients' satisfaction following MFU-V treatment, accompanied by moderate pain and a generally favorable safety profile. However, the potential misclassification of neutral responses as positive could result in an overestimation of the treatment's efficacy. These findings highlight the need for well-designed trials to further explore MFU-V's clinical applications.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.