Evaluation of patient satisfaction and maximum biting force of three differently constructed bars on two implants retaining mandibular overdenture - one year follow-up (a randomized controlled clinical trial).

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-05092-x
Amr Mohamed Ismail Badr, Mona Nabawy, Gehan Fekry Mohammed, Shaimaa Ahmed Radwan
{"title":"Evaluation of patient satisfaction and maximum biting force of three differently constructed bars on two implants retaining mandibular overdenture - one year follow-up (a randomized controlled clinical trial).","authors":"Amr Mohamed Ismail Badr, Mona Nabawy, Gehan Fekry Mohammed, Shaimaa Ahmed Radwan","doi":"10.1186/s12903-024-05092-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different bar construction techniques will affect the bar passive fitness, which may induce stresses or strain on the implant and/or tightening screw and sequentially may affect the biting force and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>This clinical investigation assessed patient satisfaction and maximum biting force (MBF) using three differently constructed (conventional casting, milling, and 3D printing CAD/CAM techniques) cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) bar-retained implants mandibular overdentures over a one-year period of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty edentulous patients seeking for two implants bar-retained mandibular overdentures were randomly assigned into three groups as the following: Group I: 10 patients received a Co-Cr conventional casting bar, Group II: 10 patients received a Co-Cr CAD/CAM milled bar, and Group III: 10 patients received a Co-Cr CAD/CAM 3D-printed bar. All the bar groups were connected to two implants in the canine area bilaterally. Within the first two weeks following implant placement, patients received the definitive prosthesis. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by using the (OHIP-EDENT-19) questionnaire form after 6, and 12 months. Additionally, the maximum biting force was tested at after delivery, 3, 6, and 12 months for each group. The results were collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was recorded on ClinicalTrials.gov retrospectively registered (ID: NCT06401187) on 30/04/2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After one year follow up, regrading patient satisfaction the three groups showed no statistically significant difference. Although, the functional limitation domain was in favor of the milled bar. Regarding the maximum biting force, no statistically significant difference was found among three groups. However, at 12 mouths follow-up the milled bar showed statistically value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, the conventional, milled and 3D printed bar overdentures groups can be used as a satisfactory treatment modality for edentulous mandible in terms of patient satisfaction and maximum biting force.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"1360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11549803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05092-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different bar construction techniques will affect the bar passive fitness, which may induce stresses or strain on the implant and/or tightening screw and sequentially may affect the biting force and patient satisfaction.

Aim of the study: This clinical investigation assessed patient satisfaction and maximum biting force (MBF) using three differently constructed (conventional casting, milling, and 3D printing CAD/CAM techniques) cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) bar-retained implants mandibular overdentures over a one-year period of follow-up.

Materials and methods: Thirty edentulous patients seeking for two implants bar-retained mandibular overdentures were randomly assigned into three groups as the following: Group I: 10 patients received a Co-Cr conventional casting bar, Group II: 10 patients received a Co-Cr CAD/CAM milled bar, and Group III: 10 patients received a Co-Cr CAD/CAM 3D-printed bar. All the bar groups were connected to two implants in the canine area bilaterally. Within the first two weeks following implant placement, patients received the definitive prosthesis. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by using the (OHIP-EDENT-19) questionnaire form after 6, and 12 months. Additionally, the maximum biting force was tested at after delivery, 3, 6, and 12 months for each group. The results were collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed.

Trial registration: This study was recorded on ClinicalTrials.gov retrospectively registered (ID: NCT06401187) on 30/04/2024.

Results: After one year follow up, regrading patient satisfaction the three groups showed no statistically significant difference. Although, the functional limitation domain was in favor of the milled bar. Regarding the maximum biting force, no statistically significant difference was found among three groups. However, at 12 mouths follow-up the milled bar showed statistically value.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the conventional, milled and 3D printed bar overdentures groups can be used as a satisfactory treatment modality for edentulous mandible in terms of patient satisfaction and maximum biting force.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估两种种植体固定下颌覆盖义齿上三种不同结构的杆的患者满意度和最大咬合力--一年随访(随机对照临床试验)。
背景:不同的杆部构造技术会影响杆部的被动适应性,从而可能对种植体和/或紧固螺钉产生应力或应变,并进而影响咬合力和患者满意度:这项临床研究评估了使用三种不同结构(传统铸造、铣削和三维打印 CAD/CAM 技术)的钴铬(Co-Cr)杆固位种植体下颌覆盖义齿在一年随访期内的患者满意度和最大咬合力(MBF):将 30 名寻求双种植体条形固位下颌覆盖义齿的无牙颌患者随机分为以下三组:第一组:10 名患者使用 Co-Cr 传统铸造杆,第二组:10 名患者使用 Co-Cr CAD/CAM 铣削杆,第三组:10 名患者使用 Co-Cr CAD/CAM 3D 打印杆。所有种植体组都与双侧犬齿区的两个种植体相连接。在种植体植入后的两周内,患者接受了最终修复体。6 个月和 12 个月后,使用(OHIP-EDENT-19)问卷对患者的满意度进行评估。此外,还对每组患者的最大咬合力进行了测试,测试时间分别为术后 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月。对结果进行收集、制表和统计分析:本研究于 2024 年 4 月 30 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上进行了回顾性注册(ID:NCT06401187):随访一年后,三组患者的满意度在统计学上无显著差异。不过,在功能限制方面,磨牙棒更胜一筹。在最大咬合力方面,三组之间没有发现明显的统计学差异。然而,在 12 张嘴的随访中,磨牙棒显示出了统计学价值:在本研究的局限性范围内,就患者满意度和最大咬合力而言,传统、磨制和 3D 打印杆状覆盖义齿组可以作为一种令人满意的下颌无牙颌治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of changes caused by Rapid Maxillary Expansion in mandibular bone and temporomandibular joint trabecular structure using fractal analysis. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of non-surgical therapy with and without ozone gel application in controlled type 2 diabetic patients with periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. The initial implementation of the transverse bone transport technique in the post-radiation region of the mandible. A pre-clinical in vivo study. Evaluating practices toward dental health among primary school children in Rwanda. Sleep disorders as independent predictors of taste dysfunction risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1