Improving screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment for unhealthy alcohol use in diverse, low-resourced primary care clinics.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11870-8
Melinda M Davis, Jennifer Coury, Victoria Sanchez, Erin S Kenzie, Jean Hiebert Larson, Chrystal Barnes, James L McCormack, Robert Durr, Tiffany Weekley, Alissa Robbins, Maya Singh, Brigit A Hatch
{"title":"Improving screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment for unhealthy alcohol use in diverse, low-resourced primary care clinics.","authors":"Melinda M Davis, Jennifer Coury, Victoria Sanchez, Erin S Kenzie, Jean Hiebert Larson, Chrystal Barnes, James L McCormack, Robert Durr, Tiffany Weekley, Alissa Robbins, Maya Singh, Brigit A Hatch","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11870-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementation of screening brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) and medication-assisted treatment for alcohol use disorder (MAUD) remains low in primary care. ANTECEDENT (Partnerships to Enhance Alcohol Screening, Treatment, and Intervention) was a practice-facilitator led implementation study to increase SBIRT and MAUD use in diverse primary care clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2019 - April 2023, we conducted a convergent parallel mixed methods evaluation. Participants were small and medium-sized primary care clinics in the Northwestern U.S. Clinics received foundational support (i.e., baseline/exit assessment, access to SBIRT Oregon website) and the option for supplemental implementation support (e.g., practice facilitation, expert consultation) over the 15-month intervention to improve SBIRT and MAUD. Qualitative and quantitative data regarding clinic characteristics, implementation strategies, and SBIRT/MAUD outcomes were collected through practice facilitator interviews, periodic reflections and clinic contact logs, interviews, pre-post surveys, and electronic health record (EHR) queries. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and the Wilcoxon sign-ranked test. Qualitative analysis took an immersion crystallization approach. Data were reviewed in a matrix to evaluate intervention adoption, implementation, and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited 75 unique clinics; 66 participated and 48 (73%) completed the study. Eight participating clinics chose to receive foundational support only (12%) while 58 chose to engage in supplemental support (88%) activities. Clinics that received supplemental support and completed the intervention (n = 42) engaged in practice facilitation (Mean: 293 min, range: 75-550 min); data review (38%), HIT support (31%), expert consultation (19%), and peer-to-peer learning (5%). Pre- and post-intervention assessments showed significant improvement in self-reported SBIRT process outcomes. Performance data improved among the subset of completing clinics able to produce data (n = 17). Clinics described positive experiences with ANTECEDENT support and highlighted remaining barriers to SBIRT and MAUD implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participating clinics engaged in a diverse range of supportive activities. A flexible approach using practice facilitation and implementation support could be helpful for low-resourced primary care clinics in improving SBIRT and MAUD for unhealthy alcohol use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11870-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Implementation of screening brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) and medication-assisted treatment for alcohol use disorder (MAUD) remains low in primary care. ANTECEDENT (Partnerships to Enhance Alcohol Screening, Treatment, and Intervention) was a practice-facilitator led implementation study to increase SBIRT and MAUD use in diverse primary care clinics.

Methods: From November 2019 - April 2023, we conducted a convergent parallel mixed methods evaluation. Participants were small and medium-sized primary care clinics in the Northwestern U.S. Clinics received foundational support (i.e., baseline/exit assessment, access to SBIRT Oregon website) and the option for supplemental implementation support (e.g., practice facilitation, expert consultation) over the 15-month intervention to improve SBIRT and MAUD. Qualitative and quantitative data regarding clinic characteristics, implementation strategies, and SBIRT/MAUD outcomes were collected through practice facilitator interviews, periodic reflections and clinic contact logs, interviews, pre-post surveys, and electronic health record (EHR) queries. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and the Wilcoxon sign-ranked test. Qualitative analysis took an immersion crystallization approach. Data were reviewed in a matrix to evaluate intervention adoption, implementation, and effectiveness.

Results: We recruited 75 unique clinics; 66 participated and 48 (73%) completed the study. Eight participating clinics chose to receive foundational support only (12%) while 58 chose to engage in supplemental support (88%) activities. Clinics that received supplemental support and completed the intervention (n = 42) engaged in practice facilitation (Mean: 293 min, range: 75-550 min); data review (38%), HIT support (31%), expert consultation (19%), and peer-to-peer learning (5%). Pre- and post-intervention assessments showed significant improvement in self-reported SBIRT process outcomes. Performance data improved among the subset of completing clinics able to produce data (n = 17). Clinics described positive experiences with ANTECEDENT support and highlighted remaining barriers to SBIRT and MAUD implementation.

Conclusions: Participating clinics engaged in a diverse range of supportive activities. A flexible approach using practice facilitation and implementation support could be helpful for low-resourced primary care clinics in improving SBIRT and MAUD for unhealthy alcohol use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在多样化、资源匮乏的初级保健诊所中,改进对不健康饮酒的筛查、简单干预和转诊治疗。
背景:在初级保健中,针对酒精使用障碍(MAUD)的筛查、简单干预和转介治疗(SBIRT)及药物辅助治疗的实施率仍然很低。ANTECEDENT(加强酒精筛查、治疗和干预的合作伙伴关系)是一项由实践促进者主导的实施研究,旨在增加不同初级保健诊所中 SBIRT 和 MAUD 的使用:方法:2019 年 11 月至 2023 年 4 月,我们开展了一项收敛平行混合方法评估。在为期 15 个月的干预过程中,诊所接受了基础支持(即基线/退出评估、访问俄勒冈州 SBIRT 网站),并可选择补充实施支持(如实践促进、专家咨询),以改善 SBIRT 和 MAUD。有关诊所特点、实施策略和 SBIRT/MAUD 结果的定性和定量数据是通过实践促进者访谈、定期反思和诊所联系日志、访谈、事后调查和电子健康记录 (EHR) 查询收集的。定量分析包括描述性统计、逻辑回归和 Wilcoxon 符号排序检验。定性分析采用浸入式结晶方法。通过矩阵对数据进行审查,以评估干预措施的采用、实施和效果:我们招募了 75 家诊所,其中 66 家参与了研究,48 家(73%)完成了研究。8家参与诊所选择只接受基础支持(12%),58家诊所选择参与补充支持活动(88%)。接受补充支持并完成干预的诊所(n = 42)参与了实践促进(平均:293 分钟,范围:75-550 分钟)、数据审查(38%)、HIT 支持(31%)、专家咨询(19%)和同行学习(5%)。干预前和干预后的评估显示,自我报告的 SBIRT 过程结果有了显著改善。在能够提供数据的部分完成诊所(17 家)中,绩效数据有所改善。诊所介绍了 ANTECEDENT 支持的积极经验,并强调了 SBIRT 和 MAUD 实施过程中仍然存在的障碍:参与的诊所开展了多种多样的支持活动。利用实践促进和实施支持的灵活方法有助于资源匮乏的初级保健诊所改善针对不健康饮酒的 SBIRT 和 MAUD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the experiences of resident doctors in child and adolescent psychiatry with virtual reality-based simulation training: a qualitative study. Distribution and predictors of haemophilia-related costs in the United Kingdom: analysis of the CHESS I and CHESS II burden of illness studies. Negotiating care in organizational borderlands: a grounded theory of inter-organizational collaboration in coordination of care. Equity and efficiency of health resource allocation in Sichuan Province, China. How to assess doctor managers' managerial attitude: results from an e-Delphi process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1