ICU follow-up services and their impact on post-intensive care syndrome: a scoping review protocol.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089824
Rui-Xue Zhang, Yu Xu, Yongming Tian, Lin He, Yuan Chu
{"title":"ICU follow-up services and their impact on post-intensive care syndrome: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Rui-Xue Zhang, Yu Xu, Yongming Tian, Lin He, Yuan Chu","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) seriously affects the quality of life of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors, their ability to return to work and society and the quality of life of their families, increasing overall care costs and healthcare expenditures. ICU follow-up services have important potential to improve PICS. However, the best clinical practice model of ICU follow-up service has not been fully defined and its benefits for ICU survivors are not clear. This review will synthesise and map the current types of follow-up services for ICU survivors and summarise the impact of follow-up services on PICS.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This scoping review will be conducted by applying the five-stage protocol proposed by Arksey and O'Malley in an updated version of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Eight academic databases including the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO Academic, CINAHL, PsycInfo and SinoMed (China Biology Medicine) will be systematically searched from inception to the present. Peer-reviewed literature and grey literature will be included. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies will be included. Studies published in English or Chinese will be included. There will be no time restriction. Two reviewers will screen and select the articles independently and if there is any disagreement, the two reviewers will discuss or invite a third reviewer to make decisions together. Descriptive analysis will be used to conduct an overview of the literature. The results will be presented in a descriptive format in response to the review questions accompanied by the necessary tables or charts.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review because data could be obtained by reviewing published primary study results and do not involve human participants. Findings should be disseminated at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) seriously affects the quality of life of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors, their ability to return to work and society and the quality of life of their families, increasing overall care costs and healthcare expenditures. ICU follow-up services have important potential to improve PICS. However, the best clinical practice model of ICU follow-up service has not been fully defined and its benefits for ICU survivors are not clear. This review will synthesise and map the current types of follow-up services for ICU survivors and summarise the impact of follow-up services on PICS.

Methods and analysis: This scoping review will be conducted by applying the five-stage protocol proposed by Arksey and O'Malley in an updated version of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Eight academic databases including the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO Academic, CINAHL, PsycInfo and SinoMed (China Biology Medicine) will be systematically searched from inception to the present. Peer-reviewed literature and grey literature will be included. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies will be included. Studies published in English or Chinese will be included. There will be no time restriction. Two reviewers will screen and select the articles independently and if there is any disagreement, the two reviewers will discuss or invite a third reviewer to make decisions together. Descriptive analysis will be used to conduct an overview of the literature. The results will be presented in a descriptive format in response to the review questions accompanied by the necessary tables or charts.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review because data could be obtained by reviewing published primary study results and do not involve human participants. Findings should be disseminated at scientific meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护室后续服务及其对重症监护后综合征的影响:范围界定审查协议。
导言:重症监护后综合征(PICS)严重影响重症监护室(ICU)幸存者的生活质量、重返工作岗位和社会的能力及其家人的生活质量,增加了整体护理成本和医疗支出。ICU 随访服务在改善 PICS 方面具有重要潜力。然而,ICU 随访服务的最佳临床实践模式尚未完全确定,其对 ICU 幸存者的益处也不明确。本综述将综合并描绘目前为 ICU 幸存者提供的随访服务类型,并总结随访服务对 PICS 的影响:本次范围界定综述将采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 在 Joanna Briggs 研究所更新版中提出的五阶段方案。我们将系统检索从开始到现在的八个学术数据库,包括 Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Embase、EBSCO Academic、CINAHL、PsycInfo 和 SinoMed(中国生物医学)。同行评议过的文献和灰色文献都将包括在内。将包括定性、定量和混合方法研究。将包括以英文或中文发表的研究。没有时间限制。两位审稿人将独立筛选文章,如有分歧,两位审稿人将进行讨论或邀请第三位审稿人共同做出决定。描述性分析将用于文献综述。研究结果将以描述性的形式呈现,并附有必要的表格或图表:本范围界定综述无需伦理审批,因为数据可通过审查已发表的主要研究结果获得,且不涉及人类参 与者。研究结果应在科学会议上传播,并在同行评审期刊上发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Consensus definition of a radiologically healed fistula on magnetic resonance imaging in perianal Crohn's disease: an international Delphi study. An uncertain future: perspectives of emerging adults with inflammatory bowel disease-a qualitative semistructured interview study in eastern China. Behavioural economics to improve and motivate vaccination in primary care using nudges through the electronic health record: rationale and design of the BE IMMUNE randomised clinical trial. Economic effects of priority setting in healthcare: a scoping review of current evidence. Effects of low-dose aspirin in bipolar disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the A-Bipolar RCT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1