Association Between an Enhanced Clinical Pharmacy Service and Patient Experience in Hospitalized Adults: A Cohort Study.

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Hospital Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI:10.1177/00185787241293385
Joscelin Givens, Ryan Dull
{"title":"Association Between an Enhanced Clinical Pharmacy Service and Patient Experience in Hospitalized Adults: A Cohort Study.","authors":"Joscelin Givens, Ryan Dull","doi":"10.1177/00185787241293385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose.</b> To determine if implementation of an enhanced clinical pharmacy service (ECPS) at a community hospital could improve patient experience as measured by medication-related Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores. <b>Methods.</b> A cohort study of 260 patients at a community hospital was conducted. Patients in the intervention group received additional pharmacy services from the standard of care (SOC) group, including daily medication counseling, pharmacist-driven medication administration, discharge medication reconciliation and education, consistent offers to enroll in a bedside medication delivery program (BMDP), and a telephone call following discharge. The primary outcome of patient experience was assessed through patients' responses to a care transitions HCAHPS survey question regarding understanding of the purpose of taking medications following discharge. <b>Results.</b> Among patients in the ECPS cohort, 75.8% had a top-box response to the care transitions HCAHPS question, compared to 63.3% of patients in the SOC cohort (OR = 1.81; 95% CI [0.61-5.37]). Top-box responses increased for all assessed HCAHPS questions but were not statistically significant. The HCAHPS survey response rate was 29.3% in the SOC cohort and 29.9% in the ECPS cohort. <b>Conclusion.</b> Following an ECPS intervention, patient experience as determined by HCAHPS scores increased, but the results did not reach statistical significance. Further, larger studies are needed on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"00185787241293385"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787241293385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. To determine if implementation of an enhanced clinical pharmacy service (ECPS) at a community hospital could improve patient experience as measured by medication-related Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores. Methods. A cohort study of 260 patients at a community hospital was conducted. Patients in the intervention group received additional pharmacy services from the standard of care (SOC) group, including daily medication counseling, pharmacist-driven medication administration, discharge medication reconciliation and education, consistent offers to enroll in a bedside medication delivery program (BMDP), and a telephone call following discharge. The primary outcome of patient experience was assessed through patients' responses to a care transitions HCAHPS survey question regarding understanding of the purpose of taking medications following discharge. Results. Among patients in the ECPS cohort, 75.8% had a top-box response to the care transitions HCAHPS question, compared to 63.3% of patients in the SOC cohort (OR = 1.81; 95% CI [0.61-5.37]). Top-box responses increased for all assessed HCAHPS questions but were not statistically significant. The HCAHPS survey response rate was 29.3% in the SOC cohort and 29.9% in the ECPS cohort. Conclusion. Following an ECPS intervention, patient experience as determined by HCAHPS scores increased, but the results did not reach statistical significance. Further, larger studies are needed on this topic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强化临床药学服务与住院成人患者体验之间的关系:队列研究
目的确定在社区医院实施增强型临床药学服务(ECPS)是否能改善患者的就医体验,该体验可通过与用药相关的《医院消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统的评估》(HCAHPS)评分来衡量。研究方法。对一家社区医院的 260 名患者进行了一项队列研究。干预组患者在标准护理(SOC)组的基础上接受了额外的药学服务,包括日常用药咨询、药剂师主导的用药管理、出院用药核对和教育、持续提供床旁药物递送计划(BMDP)以及出院后的电话回访。患者体验的主要结果是通过患者对护理转换 HCAHPS 调查中关于出院后服药目的理解的问题的回答进行评估。结果。在ECPS队列的患者中,75.8%的患者对护理过渡HCAHPS问题的回答为 "top-box",而在SOC队列的患者中,这一比例为63.3%(OR = 1.81; 95% CI [0.61-5.37])。所有评估过的 HCAHPS 问题的顶格回答率均有所上升,但无统计学意义。SOC队列的HCAHPS调查回复率为29.3%,ECPS队列的回复率为29.9%。结论。实施 ECPS 干预后,根据 HCAHPS 评分确定的患者体验有所改善,但结果未达到统计学意义。还需要对这一主题进行更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
期刊最新文献
Rhizobium radiobacter Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis - A Case Report and Literature Analysis. Enoxaparin Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Dosing in Critically Ill Underweight Patients. Axatilimab. A Cost Analysis of Opioid/Acetaminophen Therapy Versus a Multidrug, Opioid-Free Multimodal Postoperative Pain Control Regimen. Ensuring the Safety of Locally Sourced Alcohols for Hand Sanitizer Production During the SARS-CoV-2 Crisis: A Comprehensive Impurity Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1