Surgical management of symptomatic recurrent Rathke’s cleft cysts: A systematic review and individual-participant data meta-analysis

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110917
Yilong Zheng , Joel Qi Xuan Foo , Xinni Xu , Vincent Diong Weng Nga
{"title":"Surgical management of symptomatic recurrent Rathke’s cleft cysts: A systematic review and individual-participant data meta-analysis","authors":"Yilong Zheng ,&nbsp;Joel Qi Xuan Foo ,&nbsp;Xinni Xu ,&nbsp;Vincent Diong Weng Nga","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The optimal management of symptomatic recurrent Rathke’s cleft cysts (RCCs) is unclear. Here, we compared the outcomes of various surgical approaches for symptomatic recurrent RCCs. PubMed and Embase were systematically reviewed for studies that reported individual-participant data on outcomes after surgical treatment for symptomatic recurrent RCCs presenting with headache and/or visual field defect. The primary outcome was symptomatic recurrence, and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the number of recurrences, duration since initial surgery, previous treatment, and symptoms of recurrence. Of the 713 studies screened, 14 studies (30 recurrences in 24 patients) were included in the <em>meta</em>-analysis. Cyst wall resection was the most common treatment (n = 17, 56.7 %), followed by drainage with intrasellar stent insertion (n = 7, 23.3 %) and resection with intracystic bleomycin (n = 6, 20.0 %). Most of the cases were first recurrences (56.7 %, n = 17). The mean (SD) duration between the initial treatment and onset of symptomatic recurrence was 3.0 (3.6) years. Over a median [IQR] follow-up period of 1.2 [0.4, 2.5] years, patients who underwent cyst wall resection had a significantly higher incidence of symptomatic recurrence at 58.8 %, compared to a 0 % symptomatic recurrence rate in patients treated with drainage and intrasellar stent insertion or resection with intracystic bleomycin (p = 0.014). Patients who underwent cyst wall resection also had the highest risk of symptomatic recurrence on subgroup analysis, though this was statistically significant only among patients who underwent cyst wall resection as their preceding treatment (p = 0.021). There were no significant differences in postoperative complication rates between the treatment arms. In conclusion, for patients with symptomatic recurrent RCCs presenting with headache and/or visual field defects, drainage with intrasellar stent insertion and intracystic bleomycin may be superior to cyst wall resection alone. This approach may reduce the risk of another symptomatic recurrence within one year.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 110917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586824004569","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal management of symptomatic recurrent Rathke’s cleft cysts (RCCs) is unclear. Here, we compared the outcomes of various surgical approaches for symptomatic recurrent RCCs. PubMed and Embase were systematically reviewed for studies that reported individual-participant data on outcomes after surgical treatment for symptomatic recurrent RCCs presenting with headache and/or visual field defect. The primary outcome was symptomatic recurrence, and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the number of recurrences, duration since initial surgery, previous treatment, and symptoms of recurrence. Of the 713 studies screened, 14 studies (30 recurrences in 24 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Cyst wall resection was the most common treatment (n = 17, 56.7 %), followed by drainage with intrasellar stent insertion (n = 7, 23.3 %) and resection with intracystic bleomycin (n = 6, 20.0 %). Most of the cases were first recurrences (56.7 %, n = 17). The mean (SD) duration between the initial treatment and onset of symptomatic recurrence was 3.0 (3.6) years. Over a median [IQR] follow-up period of 1.2 [0.4, 2.5] years, patients who underwent cyst wall resection had a significantly higher incidence of symptomatic recurrence at 58.8 %, compared to a 0 % symptomatic recurrence rate in patients treated with drainage and intrasellar stent insertion or resection with intracystic bleomycin (p = 0.014). Patients who underwent cyst wall resection also had the highest risk of symptomatic recurrence on subgroup analysis, though this was statistically significant only among patients who underwent cyst wall resection as their preceding treatment (p = 0.021). There were no significant differences in postoperative complication rates between the treatment arms. In conclusion, for patients with symptomatic recurrent RCCs presenting with headache and/or visual field defects, drainage with intrasellar stent insertion and intracystic bleomycin may be superior to cyst wall resection alone. This approach may reduce the risk of another symptomatic recurrence within one year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无症状复发性拉斯克氏裂囊肿的手术治疗:系统综述和个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
症状性复发性拉氏裂隙囊肿(RCC)的最佳治疗方法尚不明确。在此,我们比较了各种手术方法对无症状复发性 RCC 的治疗效果。我们对PubMed和Embase进行了系统性检索,以查找那些报道了对出现头痛和/或视野缺损的症状性复发性RCC进行手术治疗后的个人参与数据的研究。主要结果是症状性复发,次要结果是术后并发症。根据复发次数、首次手术后的持续时间、既往治疗情况和复发症状进行了分组分析。在筛选出的 713 项研究中,有 14 项研究(24 名患者中有 30 例复发)被纳入荟萃分析。囊壁切除术是最常见的治疗方法(17 例,占 56.7%),其次是引流加鞘内支架植入术(7 例,占 23.3%)和囊内博来霉素切除术(6 例,占 20.0%)。大多数病例为首次复发(56.7%,n = 17)。从初次治疗到出现症状性复发的平均(标度)时间为 3.0 (3.6) 年。在中位数[IQR]为1.2 [0.4,2.5]年的随访期间,接受囊壁切除术的患者症状复发率为58.8%,明显高于接受引流术和囊内支架植入术或囊内博莱霉素切除术的患者(P = 0.014)。在亚组分析中,接受囊壁切除术的患者症状性复发的风险也最高,但只有在接受囊壁切除术作为前一种治疗方法的患者中才有统计学意义(p = 0.021)。各治疗组的术后并发症发生率无明显差异。总之,对于出现头痛和/或视野缺损的无症状复发性RCC患者,通过插入星腔内支架和囊内博莱霉素进行引流可能优于单纯的囊壁切除术。这种方法可降低一年内再次出现症状性复发的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
期刊最新文献
White matter correlates of gait and balance dysfunction in essential tremor patients. Hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke: Accuracy and improvement of existing predictive models in a rural population of the Midwest Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of primary spinal cord glioblastomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis CT perfusion derived relative cerebral blood volume < 42 % is negatively associated with poor functional outcomes at discharge in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke Customized GPT model largely increases surgery decision accuracy for pharmaco-resistant epilepsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1