The Risk Assessment Before Dose Tapering Among Methadone Maintenance Treatment Participants: Derivation and Validation of a Nomogram.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of psychoactive drugs Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1080/02791072.2024.2424285
Chijie Wang, Qian Lu, Boyu Li, Xijia Tang, Chaonan Fan, Li Ling
{"title":"The Risk Assessment Before Dose Tapering Among Methadone Maintenance Treatment Participants: Derivation and Validation of a Nomogram.","authors":"Chijie Wang, Qian Lu, Boyu Li, Xijia Tang, Chaonan Fan, Li Ling","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2024.2424285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) participants experienced a tapering phase. The benefit of tapering is based on a balance between meeting the desire to reduce methadone dose and reduction in relapse. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to assess relapse risk after dose tapering. We developed and internally validated a nomogram for risk assessment before dose tapering in 432 participants with dose tapering in the non-Guangzhou region of Guangdong, China, and externally validated it in 117 participants with dose tapering in Guangzhou. Cox regression analysis showed that the taper start week (<i>HR</i> = 0.14, [0.08-0.22]) was an independent risk predictor of the relapse risk after tapering. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.76 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.73-0.79) in the training cohort, 0.76 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.72-0.80) in the testing cohort, and 0.84 (95%<i>CI</i>: 0.80-0.88) in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram had better discriminative ability than other predictors. The nomogram was developed to assess the risk of relapse for MMT participants who volunteer a tapering phase and may help participants better make decisions about whether and how to reduce the dose to minimize the harm of relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2024.2424285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) participants experienced a tapering phase. The benefit of tapering is based on a balance between meeting the desire to reduce methadone dose and reduction in relapse. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to assess relapse risk after dose tapering. We developed and internally validated a nomogram for risk assessment before dose tapering in 432 participants with dose tapering in the non-Guangzhou region of Guangdong, China, and externally validated it in 117 participants with dose tapering in Guangzhou. Cox regression analysis showed that the taper start week (HR = 0.14, [0.08-0.22]) was an independent risk predictor of the relapse risk after tapering. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.76 (95%CI: 0.73-0.79) in the training cohort, 0.76 (95%CI: 0.72-0.80) in the testing cohort, and 0.84 (95%CI: 0.80-0.88) in the validation cohort. Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram had better discriminative ability than other predictors. The nomogram was developed to assess the risk of relapse for MMT participants who volunteer a tapering phase and may help participants better make decisions about whether and how to reduce the dose to minimize the harm of relapse.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美沙酮维持治疗参与者剂量递减前的风险评估:提名图的推导与验证。
许多美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)参与者都经历过减量阶段。减量的益处在于满足减少美沙酮剂量的愿望与减少复发之间的平衡。我们的目标是开发并验证一个提名图,用于评估剂量减量后的复发风险。我们在中国广东非广州地区的 432 名减量参与者中开发并在内部验证了用于减量前风险评估的提名图,并在广州地区的 117 名减量参与者中进行了外部验证。Cox回归分析表明,减量开始周(HR = 0.14,[0.08-0.22])是减量后复发风险的独立风险预测因子。在训练队列中,提名图的 C 指数为 0.76(95%CI:0.73-0.79),在测试队列中为 0.76(95%CI:0.72-0.80),在验证队列中为 0.84(95%CI:0.80-0.88)。决策曲线分析表明,与其他预测因子相比,提名图具有更好的判别能力。该提名图是为评估自愿进入减量阶段的 MMT 参与者的复发风险而开发的,它可以帮助参与者更好地决定是否以及如何减少剂量,从而将复发的危害降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Ayahuasca Use in Naturalistic Settings and Mental Health and Wellbeing Outcomes: Analysis of a Large Global Dataset. Factors Associated with Psychosis in 2098 Methamphetamine Users Admitted to 104 Outpatient Counseling Centers in 80 Cities in Turkey. Maintenance Intramuscular Ketamine-Assisted Psychotherapy, a Retrospective Chart Review of Efficacy, Adverse Events, and Dropouts from a Community Practice. Highs and Lows: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Impact of Adult Use Legalization on Medical Cannabis Patients. 24-Hour Induction of Transdermal Buprenorphine to Buprenorphine Extended-Release.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1