Balancing survival and suffering: factors influencing parental decision making after periviable consultation.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Perinatology Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1038/s41372-024-02166-0
Eric A Raynal, Isabella K Pallotto, Jennifer M Brady, DonnaMaria E Cortezzo, Ellen A Lipstein
{"title":"Balancing survival and suffering: factors influencing parental decision making after periviable consultation.","authors":"Eric A Raynal, Isabella K Pallotto, Jennifer M Brady, DonnaMaria E Cortezzo, Ellen A Lipstein","doi":"10.1038/s41372-024-02166-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to identify factors birthing parents consider related to potential resuscitation of a periviable infant.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Birthing parents who received a prenatal consult from a newborn intensive care unit provider between 22.0 and 24.6 weeks gestational age were eligible to participate in a semi-structured interview focused on their periviable decision making. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic content analysis.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Qualitative analysis shows that birthing parents attribute their decision to a balance between vitality and suffering, with the balance point influenced by various elements. While parents described the choice they made, none reported that the information they received during the prenatal consult had a significant impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the minimal impact that information given during a periviable consult has on parental decision making. Information from this study can be used to develop an improved model of perinatal consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02166-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify factors birthing parents consider related to potential resuscitation of a periviable infant.

Study design: Birthing parents who received a prenatal consult from a newborn intensive care unit provider between 22.0 and 24.6 weeks gestational age were eligible to participate in a semi-structured interview focused on their periviable decision making. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic content analysis.

Result: Qualitative analysis shows that birthing parents attribute their decision to a balance between vitality and suffering, with the balance point influenced by various elements. While parents described the choice they made, none reported that the information they received during the prenatal consult had a significant impact.

Conclusion: This study highlights the minimal impact that information given during a periviable consult has on parental decision making. Information from this study can be used to develop an improved model of perinatal consultation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡生存与痛苦:影响父母在围产期会诊后做出决定的因素。
研究目的本研究旨在确定分娩父母考虑的与围产期婴儿可能的复苏有关的因素:研究设计:孕龄在 22.0 到 24.6 周之间、接受过新生儿重症监护室产前咨询的分娩父母均有资格参加半结构式访谈,访谈的重点是他们对围产期决策的看法。访谈记录采用主题内容分析法进行编码和分析:定性分析显示,分娩父母将他们的决定归因于生命力和痛苦之间的平衡,而平衡点受到各种因素的影响。虽然父母们描述了他们所做的选择,但没有人表示产前咨询中获得的信息对他们产生了重大影响:本研究强调了围产期咨询所提供的信息对父母决策的影响微乎其微。这项研究提供的信息可用于开发一种更好的围产期咨询模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
期刊最新文献
Audio-diary reflections after community focus groups to address local racial inequities in the neonatal intensive care unit. Integrating parent voices into research at the extremes of prematurity: what are we doing and where should we go? Prenatal homelessness, food insecurity, and unemployment and adverse infant outcomes in a California cohort, 2007-2020. Duration of hemolysis among infants with hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Birth outcomes of individuals who have experienced incarceration during pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1