Quantifying Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Engagement in the Evolution of ICD-10 Codes.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006304
Rachel Donaldson, Taylor G Hallman, Umer Qureshi, Hannah Soltani, Christian Arcelona, Kristof S Gutowski, Anitesh Bajaj, Arun K Gosain
{"title":"Quantifying Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Engagement in the Evolution of ICD-10 Codes.","authors":"Rachel Donaldson, Taylor G Hallman, Umer Qureshi, Hannah Soltani, Christian Arcelona, Kristof S Gutowski, Anitesh Bajaj, Arun K Gosain","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code specificity is important for detailed diagnostic documentation. Insufficient coding granularity in plastic surgery may hinder accurate clinical documentation, impacting education, research, and patient care. This study examines ICD-10 code modification efforts by plastic surgeons and plastic surgery organizations within the last decade, subsequently detailing the formal proposal process and highlighting potential areas where coding modifications may be explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all modification proposals presented to the ICD Coordination and Maintenance Committee from March 2013 to March 2023 was conducted. Plastic surgery-related proposals were identified and evaluated for successful implementation. These results were compared to those of other specialties using Fisher exact tests and 2-tailed <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 472 unique proposals were identified and reviewed. Surgeons and/or surgical organizations contributed to 111 (23.5%) novel proposals, 41 (36.9%) of which were initiated by surgeons. Nine surgical specialties and 14 supporting organizations were represented. The success rate for all surgical-related proposals was 85.6%, with an average time to implementation of 24.7 months. Only 2 (1.8%) of all surgical-related proposals pertained to plastic surgery, both of which were successfully implemented.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though a few plastic surgeons have taken advantage of the ICD code revision process within the last decade, the high overall success rate for surgical-related proposals suggests that this seems to be a feasible method by which plastic surgeons and plastic surgery organizations can bring about useful coding changes that meaningfully impact clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"12 11","pages":"e6304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code specificity is important for detailed diagnostic documentation. Insufficient coding granularity in plastic surgery may hinder accurate clinical documentation, impacting education, research, and patient care. This study examines ICD-10 code modification efforts by plastic surgeons and plastic surgery organizations within the last decade, subsequently detailing the formal proposal process and highlighting potential areas where coding modifications may be explored.

Methods: A retrospective review of all modification proposals presented to the ICD Coordination and Maintenance Committee from March 2013 to March 2023 was conducted. Plastic surgery-related proposals were identified and evaluated for successful implementation. These results were compared to those of other specialties using Fisher exact tests and 2-tailed t tests.

Results: A total of 472 unique proposals were identified and reviewed. Surgeons and/or surgical organizations contributed to 111 (23.5%) novel proposals, 41 (36.9%) of which were initiated by surgeons. Nine surgical specialties and 14 supporting organizations were represented. The success rate for all surgical-related proposals was 85.6%, with an average time to implementation of 24.7 months. Only 2 (1.8%) of all surgical-related proposals pertained to plastic surgery, both of which were successfully implemented.

Conclusions: Though a few plastic surgeons have taken advantage of the ICD code revision process within the last decade, the high overall success rate for surgical-related proposals suggests that this seems to be a feasible method by which plastic surgeons and plastic surgery organizations can bring about useful coding changes that meaningfully impact clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 ICD-10 编码的演变过程中量化整形与修复手术的参与情况。
背景:国际疾病分类》(ICD)-10 代码的特异性对于详细的诊断记录非常重要。整形外科编码粒度不足可能会妨碍准确的临床记录,影响教育、研究和患者护理。本研究考察了整形外科医生和整形外科组织在过去十年中对 ICD-10 代码所做的修改努力,随后详细介绍了正式的提案过程,并强调了可能进行编码修改的潜在领域:方法:我们对 2013 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间提交给 ICD 协调与维护委员会的所有修改提案进行了回顾性审查。确定了整形外科相关提案,并对其成功实施进行了评估。使用费舍尔精确检验和双尾 t 检验将这些结果与其他专科的结果进行比较:结果:共确定并审查了 472 项独特的提案。外科医生和/或外科组织为 111 项(23.5%)新提案做出了贡献,其中 41 项(36.9%)由外科医生发起。有 9 个外科专科和 14 个支持机构参与其中。所有外科相关提案的成功率为 85.6%,平均实施时间为 24.7 个月。在所有与外科相关的提案中,只有 2 项(1.8%)与整形外科有关,这两项提案均成功实施:尽管在过去十年中只有少数整形外科医生利用了 ICD 代码修订程序,但手术相关提案的总体成功率很高,这表明这似乎是一种可行的方法,整形外科医生和整形外科组织可以通过这种方法带来有用的编码变化,从而对临床实践产生有意义的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
期刊最新文献
A Regional Analysis of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives in Plastic Surgery Residency Programs. Critical Assessment of Fellowship Director Gender and Ethnic Diversity across the Five Major Plastic Surgery Fellowships. Diversity in the US Academic Microsurgery Pathway. Dr. Sylvester J. Carter: First Black American Hand Surgeon and Early Pioneer in Hand Surgery. Real-world Use of AlloDerm Acellular Dermal Matrix in Head and Neck Procedures in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1