Is There a Difference Between Modular Versus Monoblock Femoral Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.123
Alisina Shahi MD, PhD , Hari Bezwada MD , Daniel Kendoff MD , Fouad Sadek MD , Margarita Veloso Duran MD , Heinz Winkler MD , Weijun Wang MD , Xiaogang Zhang MD
{"title":"Is There a Difference Between Modular Versus Monoblock Femoral Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?","authors":"Alisina Shahi MD, PhD , Hari Bezwada MD , Daniel Kendoff MD , Fouad Sadek MD , Margarita Veloso Duran MD , Heinz Winkler MD , Weijun Wang MD , Xiaogang Zhang MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages S171-S172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088354032401163X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
翻修全髋关节置换术中使用的模块式股骨柄与整体式股骨柄有区别吗?
回复/建议 文献资料显示,在翻修全髋关节置换术(rTHA)中,模块化股骨柄和整体式股骨柄之间存在明显差异,各自具有独特的优势和局限性。模块化股骨柄具有术中灵活性,可精确恢复股骨长度和偏移量。但是,模块化柄也会出现连接疲劳、腐蚀和植入物断裂等并发症,而且成本也比整体式柄高得多。相比之下,整体式股骨柄具有更高的机械稳定性,并且没有模块化连接并发症的风险,但其植入技术更具挑战性。模块化和整体式股骨柄设计在翻修型 THA 中均表现良好,在长期(3-5 年)临床疗效或下沉率方面无明显差异。模块化和整体式股骨柄的选择应根据患者的个体需求和具体临床情况而定。证据等级:中度。代表投票:92.7%同意,5.7%不同意,1.7%弃权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Previous Pelvic Osteotomy: A Systematic Review. Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Are Patients Still Better Off Than If Primary Arthroplasty Had Not Been Performed? Serum C-Reactive Protein to Hemoglobin Ratio: Novel Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Distinctive Polyethylene Damage in Rotating Platform Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Retrieval Study in Patients Revised with Clinical Instability. Does Stem Design Affect the Incidence of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Secondary Analysis of the HEALTH Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1