Effectiveness of a needle-free local anesthetic technique compared to the traditional syringe technique for the restoration of young permanent molars: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-03 DOI:10.22514/jocpd.2024.131
Nassreen H Albar, Prabhadevi C Maganur, Areej Ali Hasan Alsaeedi, Basmah Hakam Ali Mahdi, Shroog Ali Almasoudi, Suman Panda, Ahad Hasan M Gharawi, Hind Taher Modrba, Reem Hassan Kelani, Lamis Yahya Muthaffar, Mohammed B Hakami, Satish Vishwanathaiah
{"title":"Effectiveness of a needle-free local anesthetic technique compared to the traditional syringe technique for the restoration of young permanent molars: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Nassreen H Albar, Prabhadevi C Maganur, Areej Ali Hasan Alsaeedi, Basmah Hakam Ali Mahdi, Shroog Ali Almasoudi, Suman Panda, Ahad Hasan M Gharawi, Hind Taher Modrba, Reem Hassan Kelani, Lamis Yahya Muthaffar, Mohammed B Hakami, Satish Vishwanathaiah","doi":"10.22514/jocpd.2024.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The sensation of pain can elevate anxiety levels, establishing a cyclical pattern that may result in the avoidance or premature termination of dental procedures. Previous endeavors employing various methods and products have produced varied outcomes. Jet injection systems, employing high pressure and velocity to deliver anesthesia without needles, offer a non-invasive option for local anesthesia administration. To assess and measure pain perception levels in a pediatric population during the restoration of young permanent teeth, comparing a needle-free injection system with the traditional dental needle method. Sixty participants with young permanent first molars requiring indirect pulp capping were enrolled, all under the care of a single operator. A simple randomization method was employed, utilizing sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes to allocate participants into two intervention groups: Group 1 and Group 2. Group 1 received traditional needle syringe anesthesia, while Group 2 received the needle-less injection system, Injex (INJEX Pharma AG, Germany). Following topical anesthesia application, local anesthesia was administered, and indirect pulp capping was performed. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC), Wong-Baker Scale, Time of local anesthesia (LA) Administration, Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (FBRS), and Pulse rate were evaluated and recorded at various intervals. The needle-less injection system required approximately 26.2 seconds for anesthesia administration, significantly less time than the traditional syringe (<i>p</i> < 0.001). FBRS score analysis revealed no significant differences between groups at all intervals. FLACC score analysis during anesthesia administration indicated lower scores in the needle-free injection group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Evaluation of Wong Baker Scale (WBS) scores showed higher values in the traditional syringe needle group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Using the Injex system presents a promising alternative for dental anesthesia administration, enhancing patient comfort and alleviating fear associated with traditional injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":50235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"48 6","pages":"107-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2024.131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sensation of pain can elevate anxiety levels, establishing a cyclical pattern that may result in the avoidance or premature termination of dental procedures. Previous endeavors employing various methods and products have produced varied outcomes. Jet injection systems, employing high pressure and velocity to deliver anesthesia without needles, offer a non-invasive option for local anesthesia administration. To assess and measure pain perception levels in a pediatric population during the restoration of young permanent teeth, comparing a needle-free injection system with the traditional dental needle method. Sixty participants with young permanent first molars requiring indirect pulp capping were enrolled, all under the care of a single operator. A simple randomization method was employed, utilizing sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes to allocate participants into two intervention groups: Group 1 and Group 2. Group 1 received traditional needle syringe anesthesia, while Group 2 received the needle-less injection system, Injex (INJEX Pharma AG, Germany). Following topical anesthesia application, local anesthesia was administered, and indirect pulp capping was performed. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC), Wong-Baker Scale, Time of local anesthesia (LA) Administration, Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (FBRS), and Pulse rate were evaluated and recorded at various intervals. The needle-less injection system required approximately 26.2 seconds for anesthesia administration, significantly less time than the traditional syringe (p < 0.001). FBRS score analysis revealed no significant differences between groups at all intervals. FLACC score analysis during anesthesia administration indicated lower scores in the needle-free injection group (p < 0.001). Evaluation of Wong Baker Scale (WBS) scores showed higher values in the traditional syringe needle group (p < 0.05). Using the Injex system presents a promising alternative for dental anesthesia administration, enhancing patient comfort and alleviating fear associated with traditional injections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻恒磨牙修复中无针局部麻醉技术与传统注射器技术的效果对比:单盲随机临床试验。
疼痛感会使焦虑水平升高,形成一种循环模式,可能导致避免或提前终止牙科治疗程序。以往采用各种方法和产品的尝试产生了不同的结果。喷射注射系统利用高压和高速来提供麻醉,无需针头,为局部麻醉提供了一种非侵入性的选择。通过比较无针注射系统和传统的牙科用针方法,评估和测量儿童在修复年轻恒牙时的痛觉水平。共招募了 60 名需要进行间接牙髓盖髓术的年轻第一恒磨牙患者,所有患者均由一名操作员负责。我们采用了一种简单的随机方法,利用按顺序编号的不透明密封信封将参与者分配到两个干预组:第一组接受传统的针头注射麻醉,第二组接受无针注射系统 Injex(德国 INJEX 制药公司)。局部麻醉后,进行局部麻醉,并进行间接牙髓覆盖。在不同的时间间隔评估和记录面部、腿部、活动、哭泣、安慰量表(FLACC)、黄-贝克量表、局部麻醉(LA)给药时间、弗兰克尔行为量表(FBRS)和脉搏。无针注射系统的麻醉给药时间约为 26.2 秒,明显少于传统注射器(p < 0.001)。FBRS 评分分析表明,各组在所有时间间隔内均无明显差异。麻醉过程中的 FLACC 评分分析表明,无针注射组的评分较低(p < 0.001)。对黄氏贝克量表(WBS)评分的评估显示,传统注射针组的评分较高(P < 0.05)。使用 Injex 系统为牙科麻醉管理提供了一种很有前景的替代方法,可提高患者的舒适度并减轻与传统注射相关的恐惧感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The purpose of The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry is to provide clinically relevant information to enable the practicing dentist to have access to the state of the art in pediatric dentistry. From prevention, to information, to the management of different problems encountered in children''s related medical and dental problems, this peer-reviewed journal keeps you abreast of the latest news and developments related to pediatric dentistry.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of stress amongst different hierarchies of paediatric dental providers. Clinical effectiveness and parental acceptance of silver diamine fluoride in preschool children: a non-randomized trial. Clinical indications for the diagnosis and treatment of functional posterior crossbite in pediatric population: a narrative review with clinical description. Co-Mask R-CNN: collaborative learning-based method for tooth instance segmentation. Criteria for early diagnosis of congenitally missing second premolars based on the calcification grades of other permanent posterior teeth: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1