Intravenous Dextrose for the Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Systematic Review.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1159/000541471
Lily F Roberts, Libby G Lord, Caroline A Crowther, Jane E Harding, Luling Lin
{"title":"Intravenous Dextrose for the Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Lily F Roberts, Libby G Lord, Caroline A Crowther, Jane E Harding, Luling Lin","doi":"10.1159/000541471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypoglycaemic neonates are usually admitted to neonatal intensive care for intravenous (IV) dextrose infusion if increased feeding and dextrose gel fail to restore normoglycaemia. However, the effectiveness of this intervention is uncertain. This review aimed to assess the evidence for the risks and benefits of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases and three clinical trial registries were searched from inception to October 5, 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised studies of interventions, cohort studies, and before and after studies were considered for inclusion without language or publication date restrictions. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool or Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Meta-analysis was planned but not carried out due to insufficient data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 6 studies (two RCTs and four cohort), 711 participants were included. Evidence from one cohort study suggests IV dextrose treatment may not be associated with neurodevelopmental impairment at ≥18 months of age (no effect numbers, p > 0.2; very low certainty evidence; 60 infants). Evidence from one RCT suggests IV dextrose treatment may reduce the likelihood of repeated hypoglycaemia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.20, 2.18], p = 0.5; low certainty evidence; 80 infants) compared to treatment with oral sucrose bolus. However, the risk of a hyperglycaemic episode may be increased (RR: 2.33 [95% CI: 0.65, 8.39], p = 0.19; 80 infants).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More evidence is needed to clarify the benefits and risks of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hypoglycaemic neonates are usually admitted to neonatal intensive care for intravenous (IV) dextrose infusion if increased feeding and dextrose gel fail to restore normoglycaemia. However, the effectiveness of this intervention is uncertain. This review aimed to assess the evidence for the risks and benefits of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.

Methods: Four databases and three clinical trial registries were searched from inception to October 5, 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised studies of interventions, cohort studies, and before and after studies were considered for inclusion without language or publication date restrictions. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool or Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Meta-analysis was planned but not carried out due to insufficient data.

Results: Across 6 studies (two RCTs and four cohort), 711 participants were included. Evidence from one cohort study suggests IV dextrose treatment may not be associated with neurodevelopmental impairment at ≥18 months of age (no effect numbers, p > 0.2; very low certainty evidence; 60 infants). Evidence from one RCT suggests IV dextrose treatment may reduce the likelihood of repeated hypoglycaemia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.20, 2.18], p = 0.5; low certainty evidence; 80 infants) compared to treatment with oral sucrose bolus. However, the risk of a hyperglycaemic episode may be increased (RR: 2.33 [95% CI: 0.65, 8.39], p = 0.19; 80 infants).

Conclusion: More evidence is needed to clarify the benefits and risks of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射葡萄糖治疗新生儿低血糖症:系统回顾。
简介:如果增加喂养和使用葡萄糖凝胶仍不能恢复正常血糖,低血糖新生儿通常会被送入新生儿重症监护室,接受静脉注射葡萄糖。然而,这种干预措施的效果尚不确定。本综述旨在评估静脉注射葡萄糖治疗新生儿低血糖症的风险和益处的证据:方法:检索了从开始到 2023 年 10 月 5 日的四个数据库和三个临床试验登记处。随机对照试验 (RCT)、非随机干预研究、队列研究和前后研究均被考虑纳入,无语言或出版日期限制。偏倚风险采用 Cochrane 的 "偏倚风险 2 "工具或 "干预措施非随机研究中的偏倚风险 "工具进行评估。证据的确定性采用建议分级评估、制定和评价方法进行评估。计划进行 Meta 分析,但因数据不足而未进行:6 项研究(2 项 RCT 和 4 项队列研究)共纳入了 711 名参与者。一项队列研究的证据表明,静脉注射葡萄糖治疗可能与≥18个月大时的神经发育障碍无关(无效应数,P>0.2;极低确定性证据;60名婴儿)。一项 RCT 的证据表明,静脉注射葡萄糖治疗可降低反复发生低血糖症的可能性(风险比 [RR]:0.67 [95% CI]):0.67 [95% CI: 0.20, 2.18], p = 0.5;低确证度证据;80 名婴儿)。然而,高血糖发作的风险可能会增加(RR:2.33 [95% CI:0.65, 8.39],p = 0.19;80 名婴儿):需要更多证据来明确静脉注射葡萄糖治疗新生儿低血糖症的益处和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Care of Preterm and Term Newborns with Respiratory Conditions: A Systematic Synthesis of Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Intravenous Dextrose for the Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Systematic Review. Post-Asphyxial Aftercare and Management of Neonates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Evidence Synthesis. Immediate Care for Common Conditions in Term and Preterm Neonates: The Evidence. Prevention and Treatment of Neonatal Infections in Facility and Community Settings of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Descriptive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1