Perinatal Care Provider Perspectives on Integrating Clinical Research Into the Clinical Infrastructure.

Yanqiao Li, Kylea L Liese, Lacey Pezley, Arissara Sawatpanich, Gloria Elam, Katherine Erbe, Lisa Tussing-Humphreys, Mary Dawn Koenig
{"title":"Perinatal Care Provider Perspectives on Integrating Clinical Research Into the Clinical Infrastructure.","authors":"Yanqiao Li, Kylea L Liese, Lacey Pezley, Arissara Sawatpanich, Gloria Elam, Katherine Erbe, Lisa Tussing-Humphreys, Mary Dawn Koenig","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study explored perinatal health care providers' perspectives on the recruitment of pregnant participants and integrating clinical research into their practice, with a particular emphasis on the complexities introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From May to September 2021, semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 perinatal health care providers from an urban US health center. The interview transcripts were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework, a rigorous method for analyzing qualitative data by identifying, coding, and reporting themes. This approach allowed us to systematically code the data and identify key themes related to recruitment strategies and integration of clinical trials during prenatal care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to integrating clinical trials into the perinatal infrastructure included pandemic-related restrictions, heavy workloads, time constraints, ineffective communication and coordination, and maintaining the relevance of the research among providers. Facilitators included the use of communication tools, collaboration with multidisciplinary teams and stakeholders, creation of detailed study information for clinic staff, and fostering commitment to supporting research among providers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The perspectives of perinatal health care providers uncover barriers and facilitators regarding the recruitment of pregnant individuals for clinical trials and shed light on the unprecedented challenges of research in this population during the COVID-19 pandemic and lessons learned postpandemic. This information can support the development of evidence-based solutions and strategies to improve the recruitment of pregnant individuals, as well as enhance clinical research integration into infrastructure in perinatal health clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study explored perinatal health care providers' perspectives on the recruitment of pregnant participants and integrating clinical research into their practice, with a particular emphasis on the complexities introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: From May to September 2021, semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 perinatal health care providers from an urban US health center. The interview transcripts were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework, a rigorous method for analyzing qualitative data by identifying, coding, and reporting themes. This approach allowed us to systematically code the data and identify key themes related to recruitment strategies and integration of clinical trials during prenatal care.

Results: Barriers to integrating clinical trials into the perinatal infrastructure included pandemic-related restrictions, heavy workloads, time constraints, ineffective communication and coordination, and maintaining the relevance of the research among providers. Facilitators included the use of communication tools, collaboration with multidisciplinary teams and stakeholders, creation of detailed study information for clinic staff, and fostering commitment to supporting research among providers.

Discussion: The perspectives of perinatal health care providers uncover barriers and facilitators regarding the recruitment of pregnant individuals for clinical trials and shed light on the unprecedented challenges of research in this population during the COVID-19 pandemic and lessons learned postpandemic. This information can support the development of evidence-based solutions and strategies to improve the recruitment of pregnant individuals, as well as enhance clinical research integration into infrastructure in perinatal health clinics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期护理人员对将临床研究纳入临床基础设施的看法。
导言:本研究探讨了围产期医疗服务提供者对招募孕妇参与者和将临床研究融入其实践的看法,尤其强调了COVID-19大流行所带来的复杂性:方法:2021 年 5 月至 9 月,我们对来自美国城市医疗中心的 10 名围产期医疗服务提供者进行了半结构式访谈。访谈记录采用布劳恩和克拉克的主题分析框架进行分析,这是一种通过识别、编码和报告主题来分析定性数据的严格方法。通过这种方法,我们对数据进行了系统的编码,并确定了与产前护理期间临床试验的招募策略和整合相关的关键主题:将临床试验纳入围产期基础设施的障碍包括:与大流行病相关的限制、繁重的工作量、时间限制、无效的沟通和协调,以及在医疗服务提供者中保持研究的相关性。促进因素包括使用沟通工具、与多学科团队和利益相关者合作、为诊所员工提供详细的研究信息以及促进医疗服务提供者对支持研究的承诺:围产期医疗服务提供者的观点揭示了招募孕妇参与临床试验的障碍和促进因素,并揭示了在 COVID-19 大流行期间对这一人群进行研究所面临的前所未有的挑战以及在大流行后所吸取的经验教训。这些信息有助于制定以证据为基础的解决方案和战略,以改善孕妇的招募工作,并加强临床研究与围产期保健诊所基础设施的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alcohol Use in Pregnancy. Congenital Cytomegalovirus (CMV). Prenatal And Postpartum Care Experiences Among Black Birthing People In The United States: An Integrative Review. Systematic Reviews to Inform Practice, November/December 2024. Perinatal Care Provider Perspectives on Integrating Clinical Research Into the Clinical Infrastructure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1