Diagnostic value of circulating IL-6 in adult sepsis: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Minerva anestesiologica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18100-X
Kao Gan, Yun Chen, Lanting Tao, Jiqiang Li
{"title":"Diagnostic value of circulating IL-6 in adult sepsis: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Kao Gan, Yun Chen, Lanting Tao, Jiqiang Li","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18100-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, numerous studies have been published on the diagnostic performance of circulating IL-6 levels in adult sepsis, but the conclusions are not consistent. This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the accuracy of circulating IL-6 in the diagnosis of adult sepsis.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Literature on the diagnostic value of circulating IL-6 in adult sepsis published on CNKI, Wanfang Data, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to December 2023. QUADAS-2 scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature. Stata 15.0 statistical software was used for data processing. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were calculated. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was drawn, with the area under the curve (AUC) calculated.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 31 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the combined sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, and NLR of circulating IL-6 for the diagnosis of adult sepsis were 0.74 (95%CI: 0.69-0.78), 0.73 (95%CI: 0.68-0.78), 7.71 (95%CI: 5.66-10.52), 2.77 (95%CI: 2.29-3.35), 0.36 (95%CI: 0.30-0.43), respectively. The AUC was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.76-0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Circulating IL-6 has a good diagnostic value in adult sepsis, with moderate sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, IL-6 can provide a basis for the diagnosis of adult sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":"90 11","pages":"1041-1050"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18100-X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, numerous studies have been published on the diagnostic performance of circulating IL-6 levels in adult sepsis, but the conclusions are not consistent. This meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the accuracy of circulating IL-6 in the diagnosis of adult sepsis.

Evidence acquisition: Literature on the diagnostic value of circulating IL-6 in adult sepsis published on CNKI, Wanfang Data, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to December 2023. QUADAS-2 scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature. Stata 15.0 statistical software was used for data processing. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were calculated. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was drawn, with the area under the curve (AUC) calculated.

Evidence synthesis: A total of 31 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the combined sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, and NLR of circulating IL-6 for the diagnosis of adult sepsis were 0.74 (95%CI: 0.69-0.78), 0.73 (95%CI: 0.68-0.78), 7.71 (95%CI: 5.66-10.52), 2.77 (95%CI: 2.29-3.35), 0.36 (95%CI: 0.30-0.43), respectively. The AUC was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.76-0.83).

Conclusions: Circulating IL-6 has a good diagnostic value in adult sepsis, with moderate sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, IL-6 can provide a basis for the diagnosis of adult sepsis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环 IL-6 在成人败血症中的诊断价值:一项荟萃分析。
导言:近年来,关于循环IL-6水平在成人败血症中的诊断性能的研究层出不穷,但结论并不一致。本荟萃分析旨在系统评估循环 IL-6 在成人败血症诊断中的准确性:检索了截至 2023 年 12 月在 CNKI、万方数据、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 上发表的有关循环 IL-6 在成人败血症中诊断价值的文献。采用QUADAS-2量表评估纳入文献的质量。数据处理采用Stata 15.0统计软件。计算了汇总的敏感性、特异性、诊断几率比(DOR)、阳性似然比(PLR)和阴性似然比(NLR)。绘制了接收者操作特征曲线(SROC),并计算了曲线下面积(AUC):本次荟萃分析共纳入了 31 篇文章。荟萃分析结果显示,循环 IL-6 对成人败血症诊断的综合敏感性、特异性、DOR、PLR 和 NLR 分别为 0.74(95%CI:0.69-0.78)、0.73(95%CI:0.68-0.78)、7.71(95%CI:5.66-10.52)、2.77(95%CI:2.29-3.35)、0.36(95%CI:0.30-0.43)。AUC为0.80(95%CI:0.76-0.83):循环 IL-6 对成人败血症具有良好的诊断价值,敏感性和特异性适中。因此,IL-6 可为成人败血症的诊断提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the organ function as the primary intention of clinical reasoning applied to the critically ill patient. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block versus serratus plane block in modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Renal resistive index assessment by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is associated with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. Ultrasonography versus conventional palpation for epidural analgesia in pediatrics undergoing midabdominal urological operations: a randomized clinical trial. Comparison of remimazolam and propofol on postoperative subjective quality of recovery in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1