Dosimetric effects of the leaf positioning error of the halcyon(2.0) dual-layer multileaf collimator (MLC) on the rectal cancer radiotherapy

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Medical Dosimetry Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.meddos.2024.10.004
Jiajun Zheng MSc , Yatian Liu MD , Jianfeng Wu MD , Li Sun MSc , Dan Zong MD , Xia He MD
{"title":"Dosimetric effects of the leaf positioning error of the halcyon(2.0) dual-layer multileaf collimator (MLC) on the rectal cancer radiotherapy","authors":"Jiajun Zheng MSc ,&nbsp;Yatian Liu MD ,&nbsp;Jianfeng Wu MD ,&nbsp;Li Sun MSc ,&nbsp;Dan Zong MD ,&nbsp;Xia He MD","doi":"10.1016/j.meddos.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To study dosimetric effects of leaf positioning errors (LPEs) of the Halcyon(2.0) dual-layer MLC on the long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT) with 45∼50.4 Gy in 25∼28 fractions for rectal cancer. Nine Halcyon(2.0)-based LCCRT plans of rectal cancer were retrospectively involved. Four types of LPEs were introduced: (1) Uniformly distributed dual-layer random LPEs (Dual-R); (2) Proximal-layer systemic LPEs (P-S); (3) Distal-layer systemic LPEs (D-S); (4) Dual-layer systemic LPEs (Dual-S). The sensitivities of D<sub>98%</sub>, D<sub>2%</sub> and the Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD) of PTV to various LPEs were investigated as well as varying ranges of EUDs of OARs. The sensitivities of D<sub>98%</sub> and EUD of PTV to Dual-R was -0.65%/mm and -0.38%/mm; the sensitivities of both indices to the P-S and D-S were similar to each other, ranging from 1.92%/mm to 2.87%/mm; both indices were more sensitive to the Dual-S and values were 4.97%/mm and 3.84%/mm respectively. The EUD changes of the bladder, and left and right femoral heads were from -13.23% to 14.82%. Single-side systemic LPEs lower than 0.7 mm are acceptable for Halcyon(2.0)-based LCCRT, while dual-layer systemic LPEs lower than 0.4 mm are acceptable, considering relative changes of 2% for D<sub>98%</sub> of PTV as threshold.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49837,"journal":{"name":"Medical Dosimetry","volume":"50 2","pages":"Pages 120-127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394724000554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To study dosimetric effects of leaf positioning errors (LPEs) of the Halcyon(2.0) dual-layer MLC on the long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT) with 45∼50.4 Gy in 25∼28 fractions for rectal cancer. Nine Halcyon(2.0)-based LCCRT plans of rectal cancer were retrospectively involved. Four types of LPEs were introduced: (1) Uniformly distributed dual-layer random LPEs (Dual-R); (2) Proximal-layer systemic LPEs (P-S); (3) Distal-layer systemic LPEs (D-S); (4) Dual-layer systemic LPEs (Dual-S). The sensitivities of D98%, D2% and the Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD) of PTV to various LPEs were investigated as well as varying ranges of EUDs of OARs. The sensitivities of D98% and EUD of PTV to Dual-R was -0.65%/mm and -0.38%/mm; the sensitivities of both indices to the P-S and D-S were similar to each other, ranging from 1.92%/mm to 2.87%/mm; both indices were more sensitive to the Dual-S and values were 4.97%/mm and 3.84%/mm respectively. The EUD changes of the bladder, and left and right femoral heads were from -13.23% to 14.82%. Single-side systemic LPEs lower than 0.7 mm are acceptable for Halcyon(2.0)-based LCCRT, while dual-layer systemic LPEs lower than 0.4 mm are acceptable, considering relative changes of 2% for D98% of PTV as threshold.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
halcyon(2.0)双层多叶准直器(MLC)的叶片定位误差对直肠癌放射治疗的剂量学影响。
研究Halcyon(2.0)双层MLC的叶片定位误差(LPE)对直肠癌长程化放疗(LCCRT)(45∼50.4 Gy,25∼28分次)的剂量学影响。回顾性研究了九种基于Halcyon(2.0)的直肠癌LCCRT方案。引入了四种LPE:(1)均匀分布的双层随机LPE(Dual-R);(2)近端层系统LPE(P-S);(3)远端层系统LPE(D-S);(4)双层系统LPE(Dual-S)。研究了 D98%、D2% 和 PTV 的等效均匀剂量(EUD)对各种 LPE 的敏感性,以及 OAR 的不同等效均匀剂量范围。PTV 的 D98% 和 EUD 对 Dual-R 的敏感度分别为-0.65%/mm 和-0.38%/mm;两个指数对 P-S 和 D-S 的敏感度相近,范围在 1.92%/mm 至 2.87%/mm 之间;两个指数对 Dual-S 的敏感度更高,数值分别为 4.97%/mm 和 3.84%/mm。膀胱、左右股骨头的EUD变化率为-13.23%至14.82%。基于 Halcyon(2.0)LCCRT 的单侧全身 LPE 低于 0.7 mm 是可以接受的,而双层全身 LPE 低于 0.4 mm 也是可以接受的,将 PTV D98% 的相对变化 2% 作为阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Dosimetry
Medical Dosimetry 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Medical Dosimetry, the official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, is the key source of information on new developments for the medical dosimetrist. Practical and comprehensive in coverage, the journal features original contributions and review articles by medical dosimetrists, oncologists, physicists, and radiation therapy technologists on clinical applications and techniques of external beam, interstitial, intracavitary and intraluminal irradiation in cancer management. Articles dealing primarily with physics will be reviewed by a specially appointed team of experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Impact of variable RBE in prostate cancer IMPT planning on normal tissue complications. A phantom geometry approach to develop a RapidPlan knowledge-based planning model. Preliminary comparison of scalp-sparing effects between 3DCRT and VMAT in pediatric and AYA craniospinal irradiation across photon energies: A phantom-based study. Total body irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy: a single-scan phantom study. Response to "Critical appraisal of 'plan comparison of left-sided breast postmastectomy radiotherapy: Halcyon IMRT and VMAT plan versus TrueBeam IMRT plan'".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1