Our Experience of 500 Chemo Port Placements with Cephalic Vein Cut Down Technique-A Saviour for Cancer Treatment.

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1007/s13193-024-02000-1
Vijay Kumar, Raxith Sringeri
{"title":"Our Experience of 500 Chemo Port Placements with Cephalic Vein Cut Down Technique-A Saviour for Cancer Treatment.","authors":"Vijay Kumar, Raxith Sringeri","doi":"10.1007/s13193-024-02000-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implantable chemoport is a very useful device for long-term venous access for infusion of chemotherapeutic drugs and other agents. Niederhuber et al. (Surgery 92:706-712, 1982) reported on the first use of the totally implantable central venous port system (TICVPS) in 1982. Five hundred patients undergoing surgical implantation of chemoports in Bharath Cancer Hospital, Mysore, India, between September 2020 and June 2022 were included in this prospective observational cohort study. Five hundred chemoport implantations were available for analysis. The cephalic vein cut down technique was attempted in 500 patients and successful in 410 patients (82.2%). There were no intraoperative complications. Venous access device systems are nowadays widely used in cancer patients to facilitate frequent perfusions of chemotherapy (Vescia et al. in Ann Oncol 19(1):9-15, 2008). The placement of totally implanted venous access devices started 30 years ago. Since then, different techniques were established to reduce complications and to make the implantation safe and comfortable for patients (Teichgraber et al. in Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32(5):975-979, 2009). The cephalic vein cutdown approach for CICVAD placement appears to be a safe and better alternative to the percutaneous subclavian vein approach in cancer patients. Cephalic vein cut down approach is LESS with More benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":46707,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"15 4","pages":"784-788"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11564418/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-024-02000-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implantable chemoport is a very useful device for long-term venous access for infusion of chemotherapeutic drugs and other agents. Niederhuber et al. (Surgery 92:706-712, 1982) reported on the first use of the totally implantable central venous port system (TICVPS) in 1982. Five hundred patients undergoing surgical implantation of chemoports in Bharath Cancer Hospital, Mysore, India, between September 2020 and June 2022 were included in this prospective observational cohort study. Five hundred chemoport implantations were available for analysis. The cephalic vein cut down technique was attempted in 500 patients and successful in 410 patients (82.2%). There were no intraoperative complications. Venous access device systems are nowadays widely used in cancer patients to facilitate frequent perfusions of chemotherapy (Vescia et al. in Ann Oncol 19(1):9-15, 2008). The placement of totally implanted venous access devices started 30 years ago. Since then, different techniques were established to reduce complications and to make the implantation safe and comfortable for patients (Teichgraber et al. in Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32(5):975-979, 2009). The cephalic vein cutdown approach for CICVAD placement appears to be a safe and better alternative to the percutaneous subclavian vein approach in cancer patients. Cephalic vein cut down approach is LESS with More benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头静脉切开技术--癌症治疗的救星,我们的 500 例化疗端口置入经验
植入式化学端口是一种非常有用的长期静脉通路设备,可用于输注化疗药物和其他药物。Niederhuber 等人(《外科手术学》92:706-712,1982 年)于 1982 年首次报道了完全植入式中心静脉端口系统(TICVPS)的使用情况。这项前瞻性观察队列研究纳入了 2020 年 9 月至 2022 年 6 月期间在印度迈索尔巴拉特癌症医院接受化学端口手术植入的 500 名患者。共有 500 例化学导管植入术可供分析。500 名患者尝试了头静脉切开技术,410 名患者(82.2%)获得成功。术中未出现并发症。如今,静脉通路装置系统已广泛应用于癌症患者,以促进化疗的频繁灌注(Vescia 等人,发表于 Ann Oncol 19(1):9-15,2008 年)。完全植入式静脉通路装置的安置始于 30 年前。从那时起,为了减少并发症并使患者在植入过程中感到安全舒适,人们开始采用不同的技术(Teichgraber 等,发表于 Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32(5):975-979,2009 年)。在癌症患者中,头静脉切开法植入 CICVAD 似乎是经皮锁骨下静脉法的安全和更好的替代方法。头静脉切开法的优点更多,成本更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to encourage and promote clinical and research activities pertaining to Surgical Oncology. It also aims to bring in the concept of multidisciplinary team approach in management of various cancers. The Journal would publish original article, point of technique, review article, case report, letter to editor, profiles of eminent teachers, surgeons and instititions - a short (up to 500 words) of the Cancer Institutions, departments, and oncologist, who founded new departments.
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Bioinformatic Analysis Identifies a Tumor Suppressor Landscape of the MEG3 lncRNA in Breast Cancer. A Short Course of Preoperative Denosumab Injection Followed by Surgery in High-Risk Giant Cell Tumors of the Extremities: A Retrospective Study. Adamantinoma: A SEER-based Epidemiological Analysis. Analyzing Androgen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer: Insights into Histopathological Parameters and Hormone Receptor Status Among Indian Women. Association of Breast Cancer Subtypes and Clinicopathological Factors with Axillary Lymph Node Positivity Amongst Women with Breast Cancer in Rajasthan: An Observational Analytical Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1